Cargando…
“What if” should precede “whether” and “how” in the social conversation around human germline gene editing
Given the potential large ethical and societal implications of human germline gene editing (HGGE) the urgent need for public and stakeholder engagement (PSE) has been repeatedly expressed. In this short communication, we aim to provide directions for broad and inclusive PSE by emphasizing the import...
Autores principales: | Houtman, Diewertje, Geuverink, Wendy, Helmrich, Isabel Rosalie Arianne Retel, Vijlbrief, Boy, Cornel, Martina, Riedijk, Sam |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37326787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00652-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Changes in opinions about human germline gene editing as a result of the Dutch DNA-dialogue project
por: Houtman, Diewertje, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Experts in science communication: A shift from neutral encyclopedia to equal participant in dialogue
por: Houtman, Diewertje, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Discrepancy between disability and reported well-being after traumatic brain injury
por: Retel Helmrich, Isabel Rosalie Arianne, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Human germline gene editing. Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)
por: de Wert, Guido, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The molecular jury: deciding whether immature thymocytes should live or die
Publicado: (1996)