Cargando…

Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing

Capsule retention is one of the major complications of capsule endoscopy, which range from 2.1 to 8.2% depending on the indication. Over the last few years, reported rates of retention have fallen due to better patient selection due to the recognition of risk factors for capsule retention as well as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Hara, Fintan, Walker, Caroline, McNamara, Deirdre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1046155
_version_ 1785094108441739264
author O'Hara, Fintan
Walker, Caroline
McNamara, Deirdre
author_facet O'Hara, Fintan
Walker, Caroline
McNamara, Deirdre
author_sort O'Hara, Fintan
collection PubMed
description Capsule retention is one of the major complications of capsule endoscopy, which range from 2.1 to 8.2% depending on the indication. Over the last few years, reported rates of retention have fallen due to better patient selection due to the recognition of risk factors for capsule retention as well as the introduction of the patency capsule. The patency capsule is a dissolvable capsule with the same dimensions as the functional capsule. It breaks down in the GI tract after approximately 30 h, reducing the risk of symptomatic retention. Failure to pass this patency capsule out of the small bowel results in the patient being excluded from capsule endoscopy. We performed a retrospective analysis of the patency capsules performed in our unit over a 12-month period. A total of 166 (14.7%) of 1,127 patients referred for capsule endoscopy were deemed to require patency assessment (45.8% men, mean age 48 years). Of those who passed the patency assessment and underwent capsule endoscopy, no capsule retention was seen. Indication for patency assessment was found to be appropriate in 87.0% (n = 147). Overall, the failure rate at the patency assessment was 43.1%. The patency capsule remains an imperfect but useful tool in examining functional patency of the GI tract prior to capsule endoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10445123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104451232023-08-24 Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing O'Hara, Fintan Walker, Caroline McNamara, Deirdre Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Capsule retention is one of the major complications of capsule endoscopy, which range from 2.1 to 8.2% depending on the indication. Over the last few years, reported rates of retention have fallen due to better patient selection due to the recognition of risk factors for capsule retention as well as the introduction of the patency capsule. The patency capsule is a dissolvable capsule with the same dimensions as the functional capsule. It breaks down in the GI tract after approximately 30 h, reducing the risk of symptomatic retention. Failure to pass this patency capsule out of the small bowel results in the patient being excluded from capsule endoscopy. We performed a retrospective analysis of the patency capsules performed in our unit over a 12-month period. A total of 166 (14.7%) of 1,127 patients referred for capsule endoscopy were deemed to require patency assessment (45.8% men, mean age 48 years). Of those who passed the patency assessment and underwent capsule endoscopy, no capsule retention was seen. Indication for patency assessment was found to be appropriate in 87.0% (n = 147). Overall, the failure rate at the patency assessment was 43.1%. The patency capsule remains an imperfect but useful tool in examining functional patency of the GI tract prior to capsule endoscopy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10445123/ /pubmed/37621464 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1046155 Text en Copyright © 2023 O'Hara, Walker and McNamara. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
O'Hara, Fintan
Walker, Caroline
McNamara, Deirdre
Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing
title Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing
title_full Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing
title_fullStr Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing
title_full_unstemmed Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing
title_short Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing
title_sort patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? a retrospective look at patency testing
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1046155
work_keys_str_mv AT oharafintan patencytestingimprovescapsuleretentionratesbutatwhatcostaretrospectivelookatpatencytesting
AT walkercaroline patencytestingimprovescapsuleretentionratesbutatwhatcostaretrospectivelookatpatencytesting
AT mcnamaradeirdre patencytestingimprovescapsuleretentionratesbutatwhatcostaretrospectivelookatpatencytesting