Urinary Bladder Diverticulum: A Single-Center Experience in the Management of Refractory Lower Urinary Symptoms Using a Robotic Platform

Introduction Urinary bladder diverticulum (UBD) is commonly seen in urological practice and, in most cases, does not need treatment specifically directed towards it. However, it can give rise to symptoms that are not distinct from this finding. This makes the evaluation and management of this complex patient group challenging. We present our experience with robotic bladder diverticulectomy (RBD) for acquired bladder diverticulum to assess the outcomes and safety of this procedure when patient symptoms have failed to respond to either medical or surgical treatment directed at other associated contributing factors. Methods We retrospectively collected data on all patients who underwent RBD for persistent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, between 2016 and 2021, including baseline characteristics, urodynamic findings, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and a six-month follow-up. Patients who were diagnosed with cancer in the diverticulum, associated pathology that may contribute to their symptoms, or who had concomitant procedures at the time of RBD were excluded from this study. Results We had six patients who underwent RBD; the median age and body mass index (BMI) were 63.8 years (range 48-73) and 27.1 kg/m(2 )(range 24-32), respectively. The most common presenting symptoms were refractory LUTS and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). The urodynamic evaluation revealed varying findings like bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), poor compliance, and equivocal readings in these patients. All patients reported incomplete bladder emptying and double voiding, with half practicing clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC). Diverticulum size averaged 9.4 cm (range 8.5-12). The median operative time and blood loss were 166 mins (range 150-180) and 75 mls (range 50-100), respectively. The average length of stay was 1.6 days (range 1-3). Three patients developed UTIs within a month after surgery, requiring a course of oral antibiotics. Post-void residual (PVR) measured an average of 32.6 mls (range 0-161) postoperatively compared to a preoperative average of 249 mls (range 125-400), showing a two-tailed p-value of 0.016. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score for these patients showed an average of 27.83 (range 24-31) preoperatively compared to the postoperative average of eight (range 7-12), showing a two-tailed p-value of 0.0001. Final histology showed no malignancy, and all patients reported symptom improvement, with none requiring CISC after surgery. Conclusion RBD is a safe and effective procedure in carefully selected patients with refractory LUTS and UTIs showing good postoperative and functional outcomes. The presence of a large diverticulum can have a complex effect on bladder dynamics. In the era of robotic surgery and enhanced recovery, discussion about diverticulectomy should be encouraged after proper evaluation and counseling for patients who have failed to improve with other measures of treatment for their symptoms.