Cargando…

Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesise the effectiveness and acceptability of decision aids for critically ill patients and family members in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Yuling, Zhou, Qi, Tao, Yuexian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075239
_version_ 1785094154135535616
author Lei, Yuling
Zhou, Qi
Tao, Yuexian
author_facet Lei, Yuling
Zhou, Qi
Tao, Yuexian
author_sort Lei, Yuling
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesise the effectiveness and acceptability of decision aids for critically ill patients and family members in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant studies on the application of decision aids in the ICU, without publication date restriction, through March 2023. The methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley was used to guide the scoping review. RESULTS: Fourteen papers were ultimately included in this review. However, only nine decision aids were available, and it is noteworthy that many of these studies focused on the iterative development and testing of individual decision aids. Among the included studies, 92% (n=13) were developed in North America, with a primary focus on goals of care and life-sustaining treatments. The summary of the effect of decision aid application revealed that the most common indicators were the level of knowledge and code status, and some promising signals disappeared in randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of treatment decisions in the ICU exceeds the current capabilities of existing decision aids. There is a clear gap in decision aids that are tailored to different cultural contexts, highlighting the need to expand the scope of their application. In addition, rigorous quality control is very important for randomised controlled trial, and indicators for assessing the effectiveness of decision aids need to be further clarified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10445349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104453492023-08-24 Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review Lei, Yuling Zhou, Qi Tao, Yuexian BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesise the effectiveness and acceptability of decision aids for critically ill patients and family members in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant studies on the application of decision aids in the ICU, without publication date restriction, through March 2023. The methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley was used to guide the scoping review. RESULTS: Fourteen papers were ultimately included in this review. However, only nine decision aids were available, and it is noteworthy that many of these studies focused on the iterative development and testing of individual decision aids. Among the included studies, 92% (n=13) were developed in North America, with a primary focus on goals of care and life-sustaining treatments. The summary of the effect of decision aid application revealed that the most common indicators were the level of knowledge and code status, and some promising signals disappeared in randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of treatment decisions in the ICU exceeds the current capabilities of existing decision aids. There is a clear gap in decision aids that are tailored to different cultural contexts, highlighting the need to expand the scope of their application. In addition, rigorous quality control is very important for randomised controlled trial, and indicators for assessing the effectiveness of decision aids need to be further clarified. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10445349/ /pubmed/37607783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075239 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Lei, Yuling
Zhou, Qi
Tao, Yuexian
Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review
title Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review
title_full Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review
title_fullStr Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review
title_short Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review
title_sort decision aids in the icu: a scoping review
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075239
work_keys_str_mv AT leiyuling decisionaidsintheicuascopingreview
AT zhouqi decisionaidsintheicuascopingreview
AT taoyuexian decisionaidsintheicuascopingreview