Cargando…

Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a devastating disease with a 50% 1-year mortality rate. In recent years, medical authorities across the globe advised stricter criteria for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with high risk of IE undergoing dental procedures. Whether such recommendations ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lean, Sue S H, Jou, Eric, Ho, Jamie Sin Ying, Jou, Ernest G L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077026
_version_ 1785094155132731392
author Lean, Sue S H
Jou, Eric
Ho, Jamie Sin Ying
Jou, Ernest G L
author_facet Lean, Sue S H
Jou, Eric
Ho, Jamie Sin Ying
Jou, Ernest G L
author_sort Lean, Sue S H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a devastating disease with a 50% 1-year mortality rate. In recent years, medical authorities across the globe advised stricter criteria for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with high risk of IE undergoing dental procedures. Whether such recommendations may increase the risk of IE in at-risk patients must be investigated. DESIGN: Prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 23 May 2022, together with an updated search on 5 August 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All primary studies reporting IE within 3 months of dental procedures in adults >18 years of age were included, while conference abstracts, reviews, case reports and case series involving fewer than 10 cases were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: All studies were assessed by two reviewers independently, and any discrepancies were further resolved through a third researcher. RESULTS: Of the 3771 articles screened, 38 observational studies fit the inclusion criteria and were included in the study for subsequent analysis. Overall, 11% (95% CI 0.08 to 0.16, I(2)=100%) of IE are associated with recent dental procedures. Streptococcus viridans accounted for 69% (95% CI 0.46 to 0.85) of IE in patients who had undergone recent dental procedures, compared with only 21% (95% CI 0.17 to 0.26) in controls (p=0.003). None of the high-risk patients developed IE across all studies where 100% of the patients were treated with prophylactic antibiotics, and IE patients are 12% more likely to have undergone recent dental manipulation compared with matched controls (95% CI 1.00 to 1.26, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a lack of randomised control trials due to logistic difficulties in the literature on this topic, antibiotic prophylaxis are likely of benefit in reducing the incidence of IE in high-risk patients after dental procedures. Further well-designed high-quality case-control studies are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022326664.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10445353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104453532023-08-24 Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lean, Sue S H Jou, Eric Ho, Jamie Sin Ying Jou, Ernest G L BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a devastating disease with a 50% 1-year mortality rate. In recent years, medical authorities across the globe advised stricter criteria for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with high risk of IE undergoing dental procedures. Whether such recommendations may increase the risk of IE in at-risk patients must be investigated. DESIGN: Prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 23 May 2022, together with an updated search on 5 August 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All primary studies reporting IE within 3 months of dental procedures in adults >18 years of age were included, while conference abstracts, reviews, case reports and case series involving fewer than 10 cases were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: All studies were assessed by two reviewers independently, and any discrepancies were further resolved through a third researcher. RESULTS: Of the 3771 articles screened, 38 observational studies fit the inclusion criteria and were included in the study for subsequent analysis. Overall, 11% (95% CI 0.08 to 0.16, I(2)=100%) of IE are associated with recent dental procedures. Streptococcus viridans accounted for 69% (95% CI 0.46 to 0.85) of IE in patients who had undergone recent dental procedures, compared with only 21% (95% CI 0.17 to 0.26) in controls (p=0.003). None of the high-risk patients developed IE across all studies where 100% of the patients were treated with prophylactic antibiotics, and IE patients are 12% more likely to have undergone recent dental manipulation compared with matched controls (95% CI 1.00 to 1.26, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a lack of randomised control trials due to logistic difficulties in the literature on this topic, antibiotic prophylaxis are likely of benefit in reducing the incidence of IE in high-risk patients after dental procedures. Further well-designed high-quality case-control studies are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022326664. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10445353/ /pubmed/37607797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077026 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Lean, Sue S H
Jou, Eric
Ho, Jamie Sin Ying
Jou, Ernest G L
Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prophylactic antibiotic use for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37607797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077026
work_keys_str_mv AT leansuesh prophylacticantibioticuseforinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT joueric prophylacticantibioticuseforinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hojamiesinying prophylacticantibioticuseforinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jouernestgl prophylacticantibioticuseforinfectiveendocarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis