Cargando…

Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population

This article relates to breeding programs that seek to manage genetic diversity. The method maximizes a multicomponent objective function, applicable across breeding scenarios. However, this paper focuses on breeding decisions following immigration of 10 unrelated individuals into a highly inbred si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinghorn, Brian, Kinghorn, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37119054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esad027
_version_ 1785094187723522048
author Kinghorn, Brian
Kinghorn, Alexander
author_facet Kinghorn, Brian
Kinghorn, Alexander
author_sort Kinghorn, Brian
collection PubMed
description This article relates to breeding programs that seek to manage genetic diversity. The method maximizes a multicomponent objective function, applicable across breeding scenarios. However, this paper focuses on breeding decisions following immigration of 10 unrelated individuals into a highly inbred simulated population (F ≈ 0.34). We use Optimal Contribution Selection to maximize retention of genetic diversity. However, some treatments add Coancestry Assortative Mating (CAM). This helps to avoid early dilution of immigrant genetic material, maximizing its ability to contribute to genetic diversity in the longer term. After 20 generations, this resulted in considerably increased genetic diversity, with mean coancestries 59% of what random pairing gave. To manage progeny inbreeding, common practice is to reject matings above an upper limit. As a suboptimal rules-based approach, this resulted in 26% decreased genetic diversity and 8% increased inbreeding in the long term, compared with random pairing. In contrast, including mean progeny inbreeding as a continuous variable in the overall objective function decreased final inbreeding by 37% compared with random pairing. Adding some emphasis on selection for a single trait resulted in a similar pattern of effects on coancestry and inbreeding, with 12% higher trait response under CAM. Results indicate the properties of alternative methods, but we encourage users to do their own investigations of particular scenarios, such as including inbreeding depression. Practical implementation of these methods is discussed: they have been widely adopted in domestic animal breeding and are highly flexible to accommodate a wide range of technical and logistical objectives and constraints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10445517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104455172023-08-24 Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population Kinghorn, Brian Kinghorn, Alexander J Hered Original Article This article relates to breeding programs that seek to manage genetic diversity. The method maximizes a multicomponent objective function, applicable across breeding scenarios. However, this paper focuses on breeding decisions following immigration of 10 unrelated individuals into a highly inbred simulated population (F ≈ 0.34). We use Optimal Contribution Selection to maximize retention of genetic diversity. However, some treatments add Coancestry Assortative Mating (CAM). This helps to avoid early dilution of immigrant genetic material, maximizing its ability to contribute to genetic diversity in the longer term. After 20 generations, this resulted in considerably increased genetic diversity, with mean coancestries 59% of what random pairing gave. To manage progeny inbreeding, common practice is to reject matings above an upper limit. As a suboptimal rules-based approach, this resulted in 26% decreased genetic diversity and 8% increased inbreeding in the long term, compared with random pairing. In contrast, including mean progeny inbreeding as a continuous variable in the overall objective function decreased final inbreeding by 37% compared with random pairing. Adding some emphasis on selection for a single trait resulted in a similar pattern of effects on coancestry and inbreeding, with 12% higher trait response under CAM. Results indicate the properties of alternative methods, but we encourage users to do their own investigations of particular scenarios, such as including inbreeding depression. Practical implementation of these methods is discussed: they have been widely adopted in domestic animal breeding and are highly flexible to accommodate a wide range of technical and logistical objectives and constraints. Oxford University Press 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10445517/ /pubmed/37119054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esad027 Text en © The American Genetic Association. 2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kinghorn, Brian
Kinghorn, Alexander
Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population
title Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population
title_full Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population
title_fullStr Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population
title_full_unstemmed Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population
title_short Management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population
title_sort management of diversity and inbreeding when importing new stock into an inbred population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37119054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esad027
work_keys_str_mv AT kinghornbrian managementofdiversityandinbreedingwhenimportingnewstockintoaninbredpopulation
AT kinghornalexander managementofdiversityandinbreedingwhenimportingnewstockintoaninbredpopulation