Cargando…

Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During complete denture fabrication making Interocclusal records plays an integral role to obtain the condylar guidance value. The study was conducted to compare the protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials-Quick setting plaster and L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, C. Dhinesh, Selvaraj, Sunantha, Mohan, Jayashree, Raju, Ramesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417019
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_70_22
_version_ 1785094234151321600
author Kumar, C. Dhinesh
Selvaraj, Sunantha
Mohan, Jayashree
Raju, Ramesh
author_facet Kumar, C. Dhinesh
Selvaraj, Sunantha
Mohan, Jayashree
Raju, Ramesh
author_sort Kumar, C. Dhinesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During complete denture fabrication making Interocclusal records plays an integral role to obtain the condylar guidance value. The study was conducted to compare the protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials-Quick setting plaster and Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) in semi adjustable articulator for completely edentulous patients. METHODOLOGY: Maxillary and Mandibular casts of the completely edentulous patients were mounted in Hanau®Wide Vue articulator. The Quick setting plaster and Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) was used as interocclusal recording materials to program the protrusive condylar guidance angles in the articulators. RESULTS: The protrusive condylar guidance values registered in the articulator for the different interocclusal records were tabulated and statistically analyzed.. The mean protrusive condylar guidance values registered in the articulator was compared with two parameters obtained from the radiographic tracings -- the protrusive condylar path angle obtained with Quick setting plaster and Luxabite with the inclination of articular eminence to the Frankfort horizontal plane. CONCLUSION: From the study it was concluded that the Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) material demonstrated better reproducibility of protrusive condylar guidance registration.than the Quick setting plaster.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10445705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104457052023-08-24 Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients Kumar, C. Dhinesh Selvaraj, Sunantha Mohan, Jayashree Raju, Ramesh Ann Afr Med Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During complete denture fabrication making Interocclusal records plays an integral role to obtain the condylar guidance value. The study was conducted to compare the protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials-Quick setting plaster and Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) in semi adjustable articulator for completely edentulous patients. METHODOLOGY: Maxillary and Mandibular casts of the completely edentulous patients were mounted in Hanau®Wide Vue articulator. The Quick setting plaster and Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) was used as interocclusal recording materials to program the protrusive condylar guidance angles in the articulators. RESULTS: The protrusive condylar guidance values registered in the articulator for the different interocclusal records were tabulated and statistically analyzed.. The mean protrusive condylar guidance values registered in the articulator was compared with two parameters obtained from the radiographic tracings -- the protrusive condylar path angle obtained with Quick setting plaster and Luxabite with the inclination of articular eminence to the Frankfort horizontal plane. CONCLUSION: From the study it was concluded that the Luxabite®(bisacrylic composite) material demonstrated better reproducibility of protrusive condylar guidance registration.than the Quick setting plaster. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10445705/ /pubmed/37417019 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_70_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Annals of African Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, C. Dhinesh
Selvaraj, Sunantha
Mohan, Jayashree
Raju, Ramesh
Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients
title Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients
title_full Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients
title_short Comparison of Accuracy of Protrusive Condylar Guidance Registration by Two Interocclusal Recording Materials in Edentulous Patients
title_sort comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417019
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_70_22
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarcdhinesh comparisonofaccuracyofprotrusivecondylarguidanceregistrationbytwointerocclusalrecordingmaterialsinedentulouspatients
AT selvarajsunantha comparisonofaccuracyofprotrusivecondylarguidanceregistrationbytwointerocclusalrecordingmaterialsinedentulouspatients
AT mohanjayashree comparisonofaccuracyofprotrusivecondylarguidanceregistrationbytwointerocclusalrecordingmaterialsinedentulouspatients
AT rajuramesh comparisonofaccuracyofprotrusivecondylarguidanceregistrationbytwointerocclusalrecordingmaterialsinedentulouspatients