Cargando…
A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic face masks grew in importance as their use by the general population was recommended by health officials in order to minimize the risk of infection and prevent further spread of the virus. To ensure health protection of medical pers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645117 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13087.3 |
_version_ | 1785094261378646016 |
---|---|
author | Lifka, Sebastian Ponomarev, Ivan Weth, Agnes Baumgartner, David Lamprecht, Bernd Baumgartner, Werner |
author_facet | Lifka, Sebastian Ponomarev, Ivan Weth, Agnes Baumgartner, David Lamprecht, Bernd Baumgartner, Werner |
author_sort | Lifka, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic face masks grew in importance as their use by the general population was recommended by health officials in order to minimize the risk of infection and prevent further spread of the virus. To ensure health protection of medical personnel and other system relevant staff, it is of considerable interest to quickly test if a certain lot of filtering facepiece masks meets the requirements or if the penetration changes under different conditions. As certified penetrometers are rather expensive and were difficult to obtain during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe two quite simple and cheap methods to quickly test the filter penetration based on an electronic cigarette. Methods: The first method uses a precision scale, the second method uses a light scattering detector to measure the filter penetration. To make sure these two methods yield reliable results, both were tested with freshly cut filter samples covering the range of approx. 2 % to 60 % filter penetration and compared to the results of a certified penetrometer. Results: The comparison of the two methods with the certified penetrometer showed a good correlation and therefore allow a quick and rather reliable estimation of the penetration. Conclusions: Several examples about the use of faulty masks and the resulting health risks show that simple, fast, cheap and broadly available methods for filter characterization might be useful in these days. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10445814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104458142023-08-29 A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. Lifka, Sebastian Ponomarev, Ivan Weth, Agnes Baumgartner, David Lamprecht, Bernd Baumgartner, Werner Open Res Eur Research Article Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic face masks grew in importance as their use by the general population was recommended by health officials in order to minimize the risk of infection and prevent further spread of the virus. To ensure health protection of medical personnel and other system relevant staff, it is of considerable interest to quickly test if a certain lot of filtering facepiece masks meets the requirements or if the penetration changes under different conditions. As certified penetrometers are rather expensive and were difficult to obtain during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe two quite simple and cheap methods to quickly test the filter penetration based on an electronic cigarette. Methods: The first method uses a precision scale, the second method uses a light scattering detector to measure the filter penetration. To make sure these two methods yield reliable results, both were tested with freshly cut filter samples covering the range of approx. 2 % to 60 % filter penetration and compared to the results of a certified penetrometer. Results: The comparison of the two methods with the certified penetrometer showed a good correlation and therefore allow a quick and rather reliable estimation of the penetration. Conclusions: Several examples about the use of faulty masks and the resulting health risks show that simple, fast, cheap and broadly available methods for filter characterization might be useful in these days. F1000 Research Limited 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10445814/ /pubmed/37645117 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13087.3 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Lifka S et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lifka, Sebastian Ponomarev, Ivan Weth, Agnes Baumgartner, David Lamprecht, Bernd Baumgartner, Werner A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. |
title | A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. |
title_full | A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. |
title_fullStr | A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. |
title_full_unstemmed | A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. |
title_short | A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. |
title_sort | simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645117 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13087.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lifkasebastian asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT ponomarevivan asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT wethagnes asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT baumgartnerdavid asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT lamprechtbernd asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT baumgartnerwerner asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT lifkasebastian simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT ponomarevivan simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT wethagnes simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT baumgartnerdavid simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT lamprechtbernd simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette AT baumgartnerwerner simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette |