Cargando…

A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic face masks grew in importance as their use by the general population was recommended by health officials in order to minimize the risk of infection and prevent further spread of the virus. To ensure health protection of medical pers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lifka, Sebastian, Ponomarev, Ivan, Weth, Agnes, Baumgartner, David, Lamprecht, Bernd, Baumgartner, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645117
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13087.3
_version_ 1785094261378646016
author Lifka, Sebastian
Ponomarev, Ivan
Weth, Agnes
Baumgartner, David
Lamprecht, Bernd
Baumgartner, Werner
author_facet Lifka, Sebastian
Ponomarev, Ivan
Weth, Agnes
Baumgartner, David
Lamprecht, Bernd
Baumgartner, Werner
author_sort Lifka, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic face masks grew in importance as their use by the general population was recommended by health officials in order to minimize the risk of infection and prevent further spread of the virus. To ensure health protection of medical personnel and other system relevant staff, it is of considerable interest to quickly test if a certain lot of filtering facepiece masks meets the requirements or if the penetration changes under different conditions. As certified penetrometers are rather expensive and were difficult to obtain during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe two quite simple and cheap methods to quickly test the filter penetration based on an electronic cigarette. Methods: The first method uses a precision scale, the second method uses a light scattering detector to measure the filter penetration. To make sure these two methods yield reliable results, both were tested with freshly cut filter samples covering the range of approx. 2 % to 60 % filter penetration and compared to the results of a certified penetrometer. Results: The comparison of the two methods with the certified penetrometer showed a good correlation and therefore allow a quick and rather reliable estimation of the penetration. Conclusions: Several examples about the use of faulty masks and the resulting health risks show that simple, fast, cheap and broadly available methods for filter characterization might be useful in these days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10445814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104458142023-08-29 A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette. Lifka, Sebastian Ponomarev, Ivan Weth, Agnes Baumgartner, David Lamprecht, Bernd Baumgartner, Werner Open Res Eur Research Article Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic face masks grew in importance as their use by the general population was recommended by health officials in order to minimize the risk of infection and prevent further spread of the virus. To ensure health protection of medical personnel and other system relevant staff, it is of considerable interest to quickly test if a certain lot of filtering facepiece masks meets the requirements or if the penetration changes under different conditions. As certified penetrometers are rather expensive and were difficult to obtain during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe two quite simple and cheap methods to quickly test the filter penetration based on an electronic cigarette. Methods: The first method uses a precision scale, the second method uses a light scattering detector to measure the filter penetration. To make sure these two methods yield reliable results, both were tested with freshly cut filter samples covering the range of approx. 2 % to 60 % filter penetration and compared to the results of a certified penetrometer. Results: The comparison of the two methods with the certified penetrometer showed a good correlation and therefore allow a quick and rather reliable estimation of the penetration. Conclusions: Several examples about the use of faulty masks and the resulting health risks show that simple, fast, cheap and broadly available methods for filter characterization might be useful in these days. F1000 Research Limited 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10445814/ /pubmed/37645117 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13087.3 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Lifka S et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lifka, Sebastian
Ponomarev, Ivan
Weth, Agnes
Baumgartner, David
Lamprecht, Bernd
Baumgartner, Werner
A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
title A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
title_full A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
title_fullStr A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
title_full_unstemmed A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
title_short A simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
title_sort simple and cheap aerosol penetrometer for filter testing using an electronic cigarette.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645117
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13087.3
work_keys_str_mv AT lifkasebastian asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT ponomarevivan asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT wethagnes asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT baumgartnerdavid asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT lamprechtbernd asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT baumgartnerwerner asimpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT lifkasebastian simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT ponomarevivan simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT wethagnes simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT baumgartnerdavid simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT lamprechtbernd simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette
AT baumgartnerwerner simpleandcheapaerosolpenetrometerforfiltertestingusinganelectroniccigarette