Cargando…

Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens

Background : Prioritisation of research activities for infectious disease pathogens is usually undertaken through the identification of important research and knowledge gaps. Research prioritisation is an essential element of both effective responses to disease outbreaks and adequate preparedness. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antonio, Emilia, Chepkirui, Dorothy, Levanita, Shanthi, Ibrahim, Susan Khader, Foster, Isabel, Harriss, Eli, Sigfrid, Louise, Norton, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645485
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15335.1
_version_ 1785094276683661312
author Antonio, Emilia
Chepkirui, Dorothy
Levanita, Shanthi
Ibrahim, Susan Khader
Foster, Isabel
Harriss, Eli
Sigfrid, Louise
Norton, Alice
author_facet Antonio, Emilia
Chepkirui, Dorothy
Levanita, Shanthi
Ibrahim, Susan Khader
Foster, Isabel
Harriss, Eli
Sigfrid, Louise
Norton, Alice
author_sort Antonio, Emilia
collection PubMed
description Background : Prioritisation of research activities for infectious disease pathogens is usually undertaken through the identification of important research and knowledge gaps. Research prioritisation is an essential element of both effective responses to disease outbreaks and adequate preparedness. There is however currently no published mapping of activities on and evidence from research prioritisation for high consequence pathogens. The objectives of this review are to map all published research prioritisation exercises on high-consequence pathogens; provide an overview of methodologies employed for prioritising research for these pathogens; describe monitoring and evaluation processes for research areas prioritised; and identify any standards and guidance for effectively undertaking research prioritisation activities for high consequence pathogens. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute guidance of scoping review conduct will be used. The search will be undertaken using the key terms of “research prioritisation”, “response”, “control”, and related terms, and a list of high-consequence pathogens derived from WHO (2020), EMERGE (2019), Europe CDC (2022) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2021). We will search WHO Global Index Medicus; Ovid Medline; Ovid Embase; Ovid Global Health; and Scopus. Backward citations review of the included full text documents will also be conducted. Google Scholar and Overton will be searched for grey literature. Two independent reviewers will screen the retrieved documents using Rayyan and extract data in a data extraction template in Microsoft Excel 2021. Screening results will be presented using the PRISMA-ScR template with narrative synthesis undertaken for the extracted data. Conclusion: This review will map existing research priorities for high consequence pathogens. Further, it will provide an understanding of methodologies used for prioritisation, processes for monitoring and evaluation of progress made against research agendas, and evidence on standards that could be recommended for effective prioritisation of research for high consequence pathogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10445874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104458742023-08-29 Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens Antonio, Emilia Chepkirui, Dorothy Levanita, Shanthi Ibrahim, Susan Khader Foster, Isabel Harriss, Eli Sigfrid, Louise Norton, Alice Open Res Eur Study Protocol Background : Prioritisation of research activities for infectious disease pathogens is usually undertaken through the identification of important research and knowledge gaps. Research prioritisation is an essential element of both effective responses to disease outbreaks and adequate preparedness. There is however currently no published mapping of activities on and evidence from research prioritisation for high consequence pathogens. The objectives of this review are to map all published research prioritisation exercises on high-consequence pathogens; provide an overview of methodologies employed for prioritising research for these pathogens; describe monitoring and evaluation processes for research areas prioritised; and identify any standards and guidance for effectively undertaking research prioritisation activities for high consequence pathogens. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute guidance of scoping review conduct will be used. The search will be undertaken using the key terms of “research prioritisation”, “response”, “control”, and related terms, and a list of high-consequence pathogens derived from WHO (2020), EMERGE (2019), Europe CDC (2022) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2021). We will search WHO Global Index Medicus; Ovid Medline; Ovid Embase; Ovid Global Health; and Scopus. Backward citations review of the included full text documents will also be conducted. Google Scholar and Overton will be searched for grey literature. Two independent reviewers will screen the retrieved documents using Rayyan and extract data in a data extraction template in Microsoft Excel 2021. Screening results will be presented using the PRISMA-ScR template with narrative synthesis undertaken for the extracted data. Conclusion: This review will map existing research priorities for high consequence pathogens. Further, it will provide an understanding of methodologies used for prioritisation, processes for monitoring and evaluation of progress made against research agendas, and evidence on standards that could be recommended for effective prioritisation of research for high consequence pathogens. F1000 Research Limited 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10445874/ /pubmed/37645485 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15335.1 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Antonio E et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Antonio, Emilia
Chepkirui, Dorothy
Levanita, Shanthi
Ibrahim, Susan Khader
Foster, Isabel
Harriss, Eli
Sigfrid, Louise
Norton, Alice
Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens
title Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens
title_full Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens
title_fullStr Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens
title_short Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens
title_sort scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645485
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15335.1
work_keys_str_mv AT antonioemilia scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens
AT chepkiruidorothy scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens
AT levanitashanthi scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens
AT ibrahimsusankhader scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens
AT fosterisabel scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens
AT harrisseli scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens
AT sigfridlouise scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens
AT nortonalice scopingreviewprotocolonresearchprioritisationforpreparednessandresponsetooutbreaksofhighconsequencepathogens