Cargando…
Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals
The European Commission-funded RRING (Responsible Research and Innovation Networked Globally) Horizon 2020 project aimed to deliver activities that promoted a global understanding of Socially Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). A necessary first step in this process was to understand how rese...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645483 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15688.1 |
_version_ | 1785094286478409728 |
---|---|
author | Foulds, Chris Khalid, Rihab Jensen, Eric A. Sule, Obehi Lorenz, Lars |
author_facet | Foulds, Chris Khalid, Rihab Jensen, Eric A. Sule, Obehi Lorenz, Lars |
author_sort | Foulds, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | The European Commission-funded RRING (Responsible Research and Innovation Networked Globally) Horizon 2020 project aimed to deliver activities that promoted a global understanding of Socially Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). A necessary first step in this process was to understand how researchers (working across Global North and Global South contexts) implicitly understand and operationalise ideas relating to social responsibility within their day-to-day work. Here, we describe an empirical dataset that was gathered as part of the RRING project to investigate this topic. This Data Note explains the design and implementation of 113 structured qualitative interviews with a geographically diverse set of researchers (across 17 countries) focusing on their perspectives and experiences. Sample selection was aimed at maximising diversity. As well as spanning all five UNESCO world regions, these interview participants were drawn from a range of research fields (including energy; waste management; ICT/digital; bioeconomy) and institutional contexts (including research performing organisations; research funding organisations; industry and business; civil society organisations; policy bodies). This Data Note also indicates how and why a qualitative content analysis was implemented with this interview dataset, resulting in category counts available with the anonymised interview transcripts for public access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10445911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104459112023-08-29 Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals Foulds, Chris Khalid, Rihab Jensen, Eric A. Sule, Obehi Lorenz, Lars Open Res Eur Data Note The European Commission-funded RRING (Responsible Research and Innovation Networked Globally) Horizon 2020 project aimed to deliver activities that promoted a global understanding of Socially Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). A necessary first step in this process was to understand how researchers (working across Global North and Global South contexts) implicitly understand and operationalise ideas relating to social responsibility within their day-to-day work. Here, we describe an empirical dataset that was gathered as part of the RRING project to investigate this topic. This Data Note explains the design and implementation of 113 structured qualitative interviews with a geographically diverse set of researchers (across 17 countries) focusing on their perspectives and experiences. Sample selection was aimed at maximising diversity. As well as spanning all five UNESCO world regions, these interview participants were drawn from a range of research fields (including energy; waste management; ICT/digital; bioeconomy) and institutional contexts (including research performing organisations; research funding organisations; industry and business; civil society organisations; policy bodies). This Data Note also indicates how and why a qualitative content analysis was implemented with this interview dataset, resulting in category counts available with the anonymised interview transcripts for public access. F1000 Research Limited 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10445911/ /pubmed/37645483 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15688.1 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Foulds C et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Data Note Foulds, Chris Khalid, Rihab Jensen, Eric A. Sule, Obehi Lorenz, Lars Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals |
title | Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals |
title_full | Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals |
title_fullStr | Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals |
title_short | Social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: Interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals |
title_sort | social responsibility in research and innovation practice and policy across global regions, institutional types, and fields: interview data and qualitative content analysis outputs revealing the perspectives and experiences of professionals |
topic | Data Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645483 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15688.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fouldschris socialresponsibilityinresearchandinnovationpracticeandpolicyacrossglobalregionsinstitutionaltypesandfieldsinterviewdataandqualitativecontentanalysisoutputsrevealingtheperspectivesandexperiencesofprofessionals AT khalidrihab socialresponsibilityinresearchandinnovationpracticeandpolicyacrossglobalregionsinstitutionaltypesandfieldsinterviewdataandqualitativecontentanalysisoutputsrevealingtheperspectivesandexperiencesofprofessionals AT jensenerica socialresponsibilityinresearchandinnovationpracticeandpolicyacrossglobalregionsinstitutionaltypesandfieldsinterviewdataandqualitativecontentanalysisoutputsrevealingtheperspectivesandexperiencesofprofessionals AT suleobehi socialresponsibilityinresearchandinnovationpracticeandpolicyacrossglobalregionsinstitutionaltypesandfieldsinterviewdataandqualitativecontentanalysisoutputsrevealingtheperspectivesandexperiencesofprofessionals AT lorenzlars socialresponsibilityinresearchandinnovationpracticeandpolicyacrossglobalregionsinstitutionaltypesandfieldsinterviewdataandqualitativecontentanalysisoutputsrevealingtheperspectivesandexperiencesofprofessionals |