Cargando…

Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol

Background: Living evidence (LE) refers to the methodological processes that permit new research findings to be continually incorporated into evidence synthesis. This approach is of great value in the resolution of relevant and rapidly changing clinical questions. To date, the methods to carry out t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auladell-Rispau, Ariadna, Bendersky, Josefina, Santafe, Angie, Buchanan, Cecilia, Rigau Comas, David, Verdugo, Francisca, Ávila, Camila, Alonso, Pablo, Urrutia, Gerard, Rada, Gabriel, Rojas-Reyes, María Ximena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645196
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14044.2
_version_ 1785094313433104384
author Auladell-Rispau, Ariadna
Bendersky, Josefina
Santafe, Angie
Buchanan, Cecilia
Rigau Comas, David
Verdugo, Francisca
Ávila, Camila
Alonso, Pablo
Urrutia, Gerard
Rada, Gabriel
Rojas-Reyes, María Ximena
author_facet Auladell-Rispau, Ariadna
Bendersky, Josefina
Santafe, Angie
Buchanan, Cecilia
Rigau Comas, David
Verdugo, Francisca
Ávila, Camila
Alonso, Pablo
Urrutia, Gerard
Rada, Gabriel
Rojas-Reyes, María Ximena
author_sort Auladell-Rispau, Ariadna
collection PubMed
description Background: Living evidence (LE) refers to the methodological processes that permit new research findings to be continually incorporated into evidence synthesis. This approach is of great value in the resolution of relevant and rapidly changing clinical questions. To date, the methods to carry out this type of synthesis are not completely defined, and great variability is observed in the approaches used by different groups of authors. Objective: To identify, evaluate and summarise the current methods used for living evidence synthesis Methods: We will conduct a methodological study based on a systematic literature search to identify any type of evidence synthesis such as systematic reviews, network metanalyses and overviews that used “living evidence synthesis” as part of their methods. The search will be conducted in Medline (via PubMed) and Epistemonikos databases. Additionally, we will search websites of the organisations publishing any living evidence synthesis retrieved in the two databases, in order to identify unpublished subsequent reports. Two reviewers will independently assess each article against the selection criteria, extract data on methods and procedures, and assess the methodological quality of each publication. Data will be analysed descriptively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10446035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104460352023-08-29 Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol Auladell-Rispau, Ariadna Bendersky, Josefina Santafe, Angie Buchanan, Cecilia Rigau Comas, David Verdugo, Francisca Ávila, Camila Alonso, Pablo Urrutia, Gerard Rada, Gabriel Rojas-Reyes, María Ximena Open Res Eur Study Protocol Background: Living evidence (LE) refers to the methodological processes that permit new research findings to be continually incorporated into evidence synthesis. This approach is of great value in the resolution of relevant and rapidly changing clinical questions. To date, the methods to carry out this type of synthesis are not completely defined, and great variability is observed in the approaches used by different groups of authors. Objective: To identify, evaluate and summarise the current methods used for living evidence synthesis Methods: We will conduct a methodological study based on a systematic literature search to identify any type of evidence synthesis such as systematic reviews, network metanalyses and overviews that used “living evidence synthesis” as part of their methods. The search will be conducted in Medline (via PubMed) and Epistemonikos databases. Additionally, we will search websites of the organisations publishing any living evidence synthesis retrieved in the two databases, in order to identify unpublished subsequent reports. Two reviewers will independently assess each article against the selection criteria, extract data on methods and procedures, and assess the methodological quality of each publication. Data will be analysed descriptively. F1000 Research Limited 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10446035/ /pubmed/37645196 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14044.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Auladell-Rispau A et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Auladell-Rispau, Ariadna
Bendersky, Josefina
Santafe, Angie
Buchanan, Cecilia
Rigau Comas, David
Verdugo, Francisca
Ávila, Camila
Alonso, Pablo
Urrutia, Gerard
Rada, Gabriel
Rojas-Reyes, María Ximena
Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol
title Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol
title_full Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol
title_fullStr Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol
title_short Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol
title_sort methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37645196
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14044.2
work_keys_str_mv AT auladellrispauariadna methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT benderskyjosefina methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT santafeangie methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT buchanancecilia methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT rigaucomasdavid methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT verdugofrancisca methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT avilacamila methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT alonsopablo methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT urrutiagerard methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT radagabriel methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol
AT rojasreyesmariaximena methodologicalapproachesfordevelopingandreportinglivingevidencesynthesisastudyprotocol