Cargando…
Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
Adoption of electronic identification ear tags (EID) and DNA testing by commercial range sheep producers in the Western United States has been low, despite the availability of these technologies for over a decade. Jointly, these technologies offer an approach to provide individual animal performance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37611008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290281 |
_version_ | 1785094344891432960 |
---|---|
author | Finzel, Julie A. Brown, Austin R. Busch, Roselle C. Doran, Morgan P. Harper, John M. Macon, Daniel K. Ozeran, Rebecca K. Stegemiller, Morgan R. Isaacs, Karissa Van Eenennaam, Alison |
author_facet | Finzel, Julie A. Brown, Austin R. Busch, Roselle C. Doran, Morgan P. Harper, John M. Macon, Daniel K. Ozeran, Rebecca K. Stegemiller, Morgan R. Isaacs, Karissa Van Eenennaam, Alison |
author_sort | Finzel, Julie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adoption of electronic identification ear tags (EID) and DNA testing by commercial range sheep producers in the Western United States has been low, despite the availability of these technologies for over a decade. Jointly, these technologies offer an approach to provide individual animal performance data to improve flock health, genetic and reproductive management. This project involved a collaboration with five California sheep producers representing a broad geographic range, varying levels of pre-project EID adoption, and diverse operational practices. Tissue samples were collected from, and ear EIDs were placed in, a total of 2,936 rams and their potential lambs. We partnered with a commercial packing company, Superior Farms, to genotype the animals. Superior Farms used a targeted genotyping panel to assign parentage, and link individual animal identification (ID) to camera-graded carcass measurements. This enabled the collection of individual progeny carcass data and provided insight into sire performance, providing for the within-flock identification of prolific sires that were producing lambs with significantly more saleable meat as compared to their flock mates. Overall, almost 91% of lambs were successfully matched to their sire, and prolificacy ranging from 0–135 lambs per ram. There was as much as an $80 difference in the average edible product from camera-graded carcasses derived from lamb groups sired by different rams. A partial budget analysis modeling investment in an EID system coupled with an autodrafter and scale to collect individual weights and improve labor efficiency during processing, and a sheep flip chute to improve worker safety during foot trimmings, yielded a greater than 7:1 return on investment over a five-year time frame. Ideally, the data collection enabled by EIDs and DNA testing would feed into data-driven genetic evaluation programs to enable selection for more productive and profitable animals, and allow the US sheep industry to accelerate the rate of genetic improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10446171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104461712023-08-24 Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks Finzel, Julie A. Brown, Austin R. Busch, Roselle C. Doran, Morgan P. Harper, John M. Macon, Daniel K. Ozeran, Rebecca K. Stegemiller, Morgan R. Isaacs, Karissa Van Eenennaam, Alison PLoS One Research Article Adoption of electronic identification ear tags (EID) and DNA testing by commercial range sheep producers in the Western United States has been low, despite the availability of these technologies for over a decade. Jointly, these technologies offer an approach to provide individual animal performance data to improve flock health, genetic and reproductive management. This project involved a collaboration with five California sheep producers representing a broad geographic range, varying levels of pre-project EID adoption, and diverse operational practices. Tissue samples were collected from, and ear EIDs were placed in, a total of 2,936 rams and their potential lambs. We partnered with a commercial packing company, Superior Farms, to genotype the animals. Superior Farms used a targeted genotyping panel to assign parentage, and link individual animal identification (ID) to camera-graded carcass measurements. This enabled the collection of individual progeny carcass data and provided insight into sire performance, providing for the within-flock identification of prolific sires that were producing lambs with significantly more saleable meat as compared to their flock mates. Overall, almost 91% of lambs were successfully matched to their sire, and prolificacy ranging from 0–135 lambs per ram. There was as much as an $80 difference in the average edible product from camera-graded carcasses derived from lamb groups sired by different rams. A partial budget analysis modeling investment in an EID system coupled with an autodrafter and scale to collect individual weights and improve labor efficiency during processing, and a sheep flip chute to improve worker safety during foot trimmings, yielded a greater than 7:1 return on investment over a five-year time frame. Ideally, the data collection enabled by EIDs and DNA testing would feed into data-driven genetic evaluation programs to enable selection for more productive and profitable animals, and allow the US sheep industry to accelerate the rate of genetic improvement. Public Library of Science 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10446171/ /pubmed/37611008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290281 Text en © 2023 Finzel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Finzel, Julie A. Brown, Austin R. Busch, Roselle C. Doran, Morgan P. Harper, John M. Macon, Daniel K. Ozeran, Rebecca K. Stegemiller, Morgan R. Isaacs, Karissa Van Eenennaam, Alison Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks |
title | Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks |
title_full | Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks |
title_fullStr | Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks |
title_full_unstemmed | Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks |
title_short | Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks |
title_sort | field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37611008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finzeljuliea fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT brownaustinr fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT buschrosellec fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT doranmorganp fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT harperjohnm fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT macondanielk fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT ozeranrebeccak fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT stegemillermorganr fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT isaacskarissa fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks AT vaneenennaamalison fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks |