Cargando…

Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks

Adoption of electronic identification ear tags (EID) and DNA testing by commercial range sheep producers in the Western United States has been low, despite the availability of these technologies for over a decade. Jointly, these technologies offer an approach to provide individual animal performance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finzel, Julie A., Brown, Austin R., Busch, Roselle C., Doran, Morgan P., Harper, John M., Macon, Daniel K., Ozeran, Rebecca K., Stegemiller, Morgan R., Isaacs, Karissa, Van Eenennaam, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37611008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290281
_version_ 1785094344891432960
author Finzel, Julie A.
Brown, Austin R.
Busch, Roselle C.
Doran, Morgan P.
Harper, John M.
Macon, Daniel K.
Ozeran, Rebecca K.
Stegemiller, Morgan R.
Isaacs, Karissa
Van Eenennaam, Alison
author_facet Finzel, Julie A.
Brown, Austin R.
Busch, Roselle C.
Doran, Morgan P.
Harper, John M.
Macon, Daniel K.
Ozeran, Rebecca K.
Stegemiller, Morgan R.
Isaacs, Karissa
Van Eenennaam, Alison
author_sort Finzel, Julie A.
collection PubMed
description Adoption of electronic identification ear tags (EID) and DNA testing by commercial range sheep producers in the Western United States has been low, despite the availability of these technologies for over a decade. Jointly, these technologies offer an approach to provide individual animal performance data to improve flock health, genetic and reproductive management. This project involved a collaboration with five California sheep producers representing a broad geographic range, varying levels of pre-project EID adoption, and diverse operational practices. Tissue samples were collected from, and ear EIDs were placed in, a total of 2,936 rams and their potential lambs. We partnered with a commercial packing company, Superior Farms, to genotype the animals. Superior Farms used a targeted genotyping panel to assign parentage, and link individual animal identification (ID) to camera-graded carcass measurements. This enabled the collection of individual progeny carcass data and provided insight into sire performance, providing for the within-flock identification of prolific sires that were producing lambs with significantly more saleable meat as compared to their flock mates. Overall, almost 91% of lambs were successfully matched to their sire, and prolificacy ranging from 0–135 lambs per ram. There was as much as an $80 difference in the average edible product from camera-graded carcasses derived from lamb groups sired by different rams. A partial budget analysis modeling investment in an EID system coupled with an autodrafter and scale to collect individual weights and improve labor efficiency during processing, and a sheep flip chute to improve worker safety during foot trimmings, yielded a greater than 7:1 return on investment over a five-year time frame. Ideally, the data collection enabled by EIDs and DNA testing would feed into data-driven genetic evaluation programs to enable selection for more productive and profitable animals, and allow the US sheep industry to accelerate the rate of genetic improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10446171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104461712023-08-24 Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks Finzel, Julie A. Brown, Austin R. Busch, Roselle C. Doran, Morgan P. Harper, John M. Macon, Daniel K. Ozeran, Rebecca K. Stegemiller, Morgan R. Isaacs, Karissa Van Eenennaam, Alison PLoS One Research Article Adoption of electronic identification ear tags (EID) and DNA testing by commercial range sheep producers in the Western United States has been low, despite the availability of these technologies for over a decade. Jointly, these technologies offer an approach to provide individual animal performance data to improve flock health, genetic and reproductive management. This project involved a collaboration with five California sheep producers representing a broad geographic range, varying levels of pre-project EID adoption, and diverse operational practices. Tissue samples were collected from, and ear EIDs were placed in, a total of 2,936 rams and their potential lambs. We partnered with a commercial packing company, Superior Farms, to genotype the animals. Superior Farms used a targeted genotyping panel to assign parentage, and link individual animal identification (ID) to camera-graded carcass measurements. This enabled the collection of individual progeny carcass data and provided insight into sire performance, providing for the within-flock identification of prolific sires that were producing lambs with significantly more saleable meat as compared to their flock mates. Overall, almost 91% of lambs were successfully matched to their sire, and prolificacy ranging from 0–135 lambs per ram. There was as much as an $80 difference in the average edible product from camera-graded carcasses derived from lamb groups sired by different rams. A partial budget analysis modeling investment in an EID system coupled with an autodrafter and scale to collect individual weights and improve labor efficiency during processing, and a sheep flip chute to improve worker safety during foot trimmings, yielded a greater than 7:1 return on investment over a five-year time frame. Ideally, the data collection enabled by EIDs and DNA testing would feed into data-driven genetic evaluation programs to enable selection for more productive and profitable animals, and allow the US sheep industry to accelerate the rate of genetic improvement. Public Library of Science 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10446171/ /pubmed/37611008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290281 Text en © 2023 Finzel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Finzel, Julie A.
Brown, Austin R.
Busch, Roselle C.
Doran, Morgan P.
Harper, John M.
Macon, Daniel K.
Ozeran, Rebecca K.
Stegemiller, Morgan R.
Isaacs, Karissa
Van Eenennaam, Alison
Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
title Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
title_full Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
title_fullStr Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
title_full_unstemmed Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
title_short Field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
title_sort field demonstration analyzing the implementation of individual animal electronic identification and genetic testing in western range sheep flocks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37611008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290281
work_keys_str_mv AT finzeljuliea fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT brownaustinr fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT buschrosellec fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT doranmorganp fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT harperjohnm fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT macondanielk fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT ozeranrebeccak fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT stegemillermorganr fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT isaacskarissa fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks
AT vaneenennaamalison fielddemonstrationanalyzingtheimplementationofindividualanimalelectronicidentificationandgenetictestinginwesternrangesheepflocks