Cargando…

Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine readmissions following microlaryngeal surgery. It was hypothesized that airway surgical procedures would have higher rates of readmission. DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Outpatient microlaryngeal surgeries from May 1, 2018 to November 27,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Syamal, Mausumi N., Kincaid, Hope, Sutter, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1101
_version_ 1785094366948229120
author Syamal, Mausumi N.
Kincaid, Hope
Sutter, Alison
author_facet Syamal, Mausumi N.
Kincaid, Hope
Sutter, Alison
author_sort Syamal, Mausumi N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine readmissions following microlaryngeal surgery. It was hypothesized that airway surgical procedures would have higher rates of readmission. DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Outpatient microlaryngeal surgeries from May 1, 2018 to November 27, 2022 were reviewed. Readmissions related to the original surgery within a 30‐day postoperative period were examined. Patient demographics, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, comorbidities, type of surgery, ventilation techniques, and operative times were examined and compared. RESULTS: Out of 480 procedures analyzed, 19 (4.0%) resulted in a readmission, 9 (1.9%) of which were for glottic stenosis management. Undergoing an airway procedure was significantly associated with a readmission (p = .002) and increased the odds of readmission by 5.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.22–16.16, p < .001). Current/former smoking status increased the odds of readmission by 4.50 (95% CI: 1.33–15.19, p = .016). Each additional minute of operating time increased the odds of readmission by 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00–1.05, p = .04). CONCLUSION: Readmissions from microlaryngeal surgery are seldom reported but nonetheless occur. Identifying factors that may place a procedure at risk for readmission can help improve surgical quality of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10446258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104462582023-08-24 Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery Syamal, Mausumi N. Kincaid, Hope Sutter, Alison Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology, Speech and Language Science OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine readmissions following microlaryngeal surgery. It was hypothesized that airway surgical procedures would have higher rates of readmission. DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Outpatient microlaryngeal surgeries from May 1, 2018 to November 27, 2022 were reviewed. Readmissions related to the original surgery within a 30‐day postoperative period were examined. Patient demographics, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, comorbidities, type of surgery, ventilation techniques, and operative times were examined and compared. RESULTS: Out of 480 procedures analyzed, 19 (4.0%) resulted in a readmission, 9 (1.9%) of which were for glottic stenosis management. Undergoing an airway procedure was significantly associated with a readmission (p = .002) and increased the odds of readmission by 5.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.22–16.16, p < .001). Current/former smoking status increased the odds of readmission by 4.50 (95% CI: 1.33–15.19, p = .016). Each additional minute of operating time increased the odds of readmission by 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00–1.05, p = .04). CONCLUSION: Readmissions from microlaryngeal surgery are seldom reported but nonetheless occur. Identifying factors that may place a procedure at risk for readmission can help improve surgical quality of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10446258/ /pubmed/37621263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1101 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
Syamal, Mausumi N.
Kincaid, Hope
Sutter, Alison
Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery
title Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery
title_full Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery
title_fullStr Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery
title_short Examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery
title_sort examining readmissions following outpatient microlaryngeal surgery
topic Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1101
work_keys_str_mv AT syamalmausumin examiningreadmissionsfollowingoutpatientmicrolaryngealsurgery
AT kincaidhope examiningreadmissionsfollowingoutpatientmicrolaryngealsurgery
AT sutteralison examiningreadmissionsfollowingoutpatientmicrolaryngealsurgery