Cargando…

Treatment of buccal mucosal carcinomas: A survey amongst head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no up‐to‐date guideline for the treatment of buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) in the Netherlands. A questionnaire was used to investigate the opinions of Dutch head and neck surgeons on BMSCC of the cheek treatment. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adriaansens, Carleen M. E. M., Noorlag, Rob, de Bree, Remco, van Es, Robert J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1081
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no up‐to‐date guideline for the treatment of buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) in the Netherlands. A questionnaire was used to investigate the opinions of Dutch head and neck surgeons on BMSCC of the cheek treatment. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 91 head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands. Their opinions on surgical tumor‐free margins, through‐and‐through defects, and indications for local adjuvant therapy were questioned. RESULTS: The response rate was 51%. To prevent a through‐and‐through defect, 67% of the surgeons would accept a deep clinical (macroscopic) margin of ≤5 mm. The less adverse histological characteristics a tumor has, the less consensus there is amongst the surgeons for local adjuvant treatment in case of close margins. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus amongst Dutch head and neck surgeons about the optimal treatment for BMSCC of the cheek. There are different opinions on acceptable resection margins, indications for a through‐and‐through defect, and indications for adjuvant treatment. BMSCC of the cheek treatment should be more uniform and less surgeon dependent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A