Cargando…
Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Antibiotics that increase growth have long been employed as a component of chicken growth. Long-term, unchecked usage may lead to microbial imbalance, resistance, and immune system suppression. Probiotics are a suitable and secure feed additive that may be provided as a solution....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Veterinary World
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621531 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.1461-1467 |
_version_ | 1785094393600933888 |
---|---|
author | Agustono, Bodhi Warsito, Sunaryo Hadi Yunita, Maya Nurwartanti Lokapirnasari, Widya Paramita Hidanah, Sri Sabdoningrum, Emy Koestanti Al-Arif, Mohammad Anam Lamid, Mirni Yuliani, Gandul Atik Chhetri, Shekhar Windria, Sarasati |
author_facet | Agustono, Bodhi Warsito, Sunaryo Hadi Yunita, Maya Nurwartanti Lokapirnasari, Widya Paramita Hidanah, Sri Sabdoningrum, Emy Koestanti Al-Arif, Mohammad Anam Lamid, Mirni Yuliani, Gandul Atik Chhetri, Shekhar Windria, Sarasati |
author_sort | Agustono, Bodhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Antibiotics that increase growth have long been employed as a component of chicken growth. Long-term, unchecked usage may lead to microbial imbalance, resistance, and immune system suppression. Probiotics are a suitable and secure feed additive that may be provided as a solution. The objective of this research was to ascertain the effects of dietary multistrain probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillus plantarum) on the morphology (length and weight) of reproductive organs and productivity performance of laying hens during the early stage of laying. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ISA Brown commercial layer chicks of the same body weight (BW) that were 5 days old were divided into five treatments, each with four replicates and four chicks in each duplicate. There were five different dietary interventions: (T1) 100% base feed; (T2) base feed with 2.5 g of antibiotic growth promoter/kg feed; (T3) base feed plus probiotics; (T4) base feed at 1 mL/kg with probiotics; and (T5) base feed with probiotics, 3 mL/kg feed, 5 mL/kg of feed. The parameters observed were performance, internal and exterior egg quality, and the morphology (length and weight) of laying hens’ reproductive organs. RESULTS: Probiotic supplementation (L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium, and L. plantarum) significantly affected the BW, feed intake, egg weight, yolk index, albumin index, Haugh unit, egg height, egg width, and morphology (length and weight) of laying hens’ reproductive organs compared to the control group (basic feed). In addition, there was no discernible difference between treatment groups in theeggshell weight and thickness variables across all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: When laying hens were between 17 and 21 weeks old, during the early laying period, microbiota inoculum supplements (L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium, and L. plantarum) increased growth, the quality of the internal and external layers’ eggs, and the morphology of the laying hens’ reproductive organs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10446726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104467262023-08-24 Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens Agustono, Bodhi Warsito, Sunaryo Hadi Yunita, Maya Nurwartanti Lokapirnasari, Widya Paramita Hidanah, Sri Sabdoningrum, Emy Koestanti Al-Arif, Mohammad Anam Lamid, Mirni Yuliani, Gandul Atik Chhetri, Shekhar Windria, Sarasati Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Antibiotics that increase growth have long been employed as a component of chicken growth. Long-term, unchecked usage may lead to microbial imbalance, resistance, and immune system suppression. Probiotics are a suitable and secure feed additive that may be provided as a solution. The objective of this research was to ascertain the effects of dietary multistrain probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillus plantarum) on the morphology (length and weight) of reproductive organs and productivity performance of laying hens during the early stage of laying. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ISA Brown commercial layer chicks of the same body weight (BW) that were 5 days old were divided into five treatments, each with four replicates and four chicks in each duplicate. There were five different dietary interventions: (T1) 100% base feed; (T2) base feed with 2.5 g of antibiotic growth promoter/kg feed; (T3) base feed plus probiotics; (T4) base feed at 1 mL/kg with probiotics; and (T5) base feed with probiotics, 3 mL/kg feed, 5 mL/kg of feed. The parameters observed were performance, internal and exterior egg quality, and the morphology (length and weight) of laying hens’ reproductive organs. RESULTS: Probiotic supplementation (L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium, and L. plantarum) significantly affected the BW, feed intake, egg weight, yolk index, albumin index, Haugh unit, egg height, egg width, and morphology (length and weight) of laying hens’ reproductive organs compared to the control group (basic feed). In addition, there was no discernible difference between treatment groups in theeggshell weight and thickness variables across all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: When laying hens were between 17 and 21 weeks old, during the early laying period, microbiota inoculum supplements (L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium, and L. plantarum) increased growth, the quality of the internal and external layers’ eggs, and the morphology of the laying hens’ reproductive organs. Veterinary World 2023 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10446726/ /pubmed/37621531 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.1461-1467 Text en Copyright: © Agustono, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Agustono, Bodhi Warsito, Sunaryo Hadi Yunita, Maya Nurwartanti Lokapirnasari, Widya Paramita Hidanah, Sri Sabdoningrum, Emy Koestanti Al-Arif, Mohammad Anam Lamid, Mirni Yuliani, Gandul Atik Chhetri, Shekhar Windria, Sarasati Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens |
title | Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens |
title_full | Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens |
title_fullStr | Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens |
title_short | Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens |
title_sort | influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37621531 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.1461-1467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agustonobodhi influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT warsitosunaryohadi influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT yunitamayanurwartanti influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT lokapirnasariwidyaparamita influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT hidanahsri influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT sabdoningrumemykoestanti influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT alarifmohammadanam influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT lamidmirni influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT yulianigandulatik influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT chhetrishekhar influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens AT windriasarasati influenceofmicrobiotainoculumasasubstituteforantibioticgrowthpromoterduringtheinitiallayingphaseonproductivityperformanceeggqualityandthemorphologyofreproductiveorgansinlayinghens |