Cargando…

Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures

The purpose of this review was to identify the effectiveness of environmental control (EC) non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through conducting a systematic review. EC NPIs considered in this review are room ventilation, air filtration/cleaning, room occu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madhusudanan, Anagha, Iddon, Christopher, Cevik, Muge, Naismith, James H., Fitzgerald, Shaun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37611631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0130
_version_ 1785094429261955072
author Madhusudanan, Anagha
Iddon, Christopher
Cevik, Muge
Naismith, James H.
Fitzgerald, Shaun
author_facet Madhusudanan, Anagha
Iddon, Christopher
Cevik, Muge
Naismith, James H.
Fitzgerald, Shaun
author_sort Madhusudanan, Anagha
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this review was to identify the effectiveness of environmental control (EC) non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through conducting a systematic review. EC NPIs considered in this review are room ventilation, air filtration/cleaning, room occupancy, surface disinfection, barrier devices, [Formula: see text] monitoring and one-way-systems. Systematic searches of databases from Web of Science, Medline, EMBASE, preprint servers MedRxiv and BioRxiv were conducted in order to identify studies reported between 1 January 2020 and 1 December 2022. All articles reporting on the effectiveness of ventilation, air filtration/cleaning, room occupancy, surface disinfection, barrier devices, [Formula: see text] monitoring and one-way systems in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 were retrieved and screened. In total, 13 971 articles were identified for screening. The initial title and abstract screening identified 1328 articles for full text review. Overall, 19 references provided evidence for the effectiveness of NPIs: 12 reported on ventilation, 4 on air cleaning devices, 5 on surface disinfection, 6 on room occupancy and 1 on screens/barriers. No studies were found that considered the effectiveness of [Formula: see text] monitoring or the implementation of one-way systems. Many of these studies were assessed to have critical risk of bias in at least one domain, largely due to confounding factors that could have affected the measured outcomes. As a result, there is low confidence in the findings. Evidence suggests that EC NPIs of ventilation, air cleaning devices and reduction in room-occupancy may have a role in reducing transmission in certain settings. However, the evidence was usually of low or very low quality and certainty, and hence the level of confidence ascribed to this conclusion is low. Based on the evidence found, it was not possible to draw any specific conclusions regarding the effectiveness of surface disinfection and the use of barrier devices. From these results, we further conclude that community agreed standards for well-designed epidemiological studies with low risk of bias are needed. Implementation of such standards would enable more confident assessment in the future of the effectiveness of EC NPIs in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens in real-world settings. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic: the evidence’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10446906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104469062023-08-24 Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures Madhusudanan, Anagha Iddon, Christopher Cevik, Muge Naismith, James H. Fitzgerald, Shaun Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles The purpose of this review was to identify the effectiveness of environmental control (EC) non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through conducting a systematic review. EC NPIs considered in this review are room ventilation, air filtration/cleaning, room occupancy, surface disinfection, barrier devices, [Formula: see text] monitoring and one-way-systems. Systematic searches of databases from Web of Science, Medline, EMBASE, preprint servers MedRxiv and BioRxiv were conducted in order to identify studies reported between 1 January 2020 and 1 December 2022. All articles reporting on the effectiveness of ventilation, air filtration/cleaning, room occupancy, surface disinfection, barrier devices, [Formula: see text] monitoring and one-way systems in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 were retrieved and screened. In total, 13 971 articles were identified for screening. The initial title and abstract screening identified 1328 articles for full text review. Overall, 19 references provided evidence for the effectiveness of NPIs: 12 reported on ventilation, 4 on air cleaning devices, 5 on surface disinfection, 6 on room occupancy and 1 on screens/barriers. No studies were found that considered the effectiveness of [Formula: see text] monitoring or the implementation of one-way systems. Many of these studies were assessed to have critical risk of bias in at least one domain, largely due to confounding factors that could have affected the measured outcomes. As a result, there is low confidence in the findings. Evidence suggests that EC NPIs of ventilation, air cleaning devices and reduction in room-occupancy may have a role in reducing transmission in certain settings. However, the evidence was usually of low or very low quality and certainty, and hence the level of confidence ascribed to this conclusion is low. Based on the evidence found, it was not possible to draw any specific conclusions regarding the effectiveness of surface disinfection and the use of barrier devices. From these results, we further conclude that community agreed standards for well-designed epidemiological studies with low risk of bias are needed. Implementation of such standards would enable more confident assessment in the future of the effectiveness of EC NPIs in reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens in real-world settings. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic: the evidence’. The Royal Society 2023-10-09 2023-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10446906/ /pubmed/37611631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0130 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Madhusudanan, Anagha
Iddon, Christopher
Cevik, Muge
Naismith, James H.
Fitzgerald, Shaun
Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures
title Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures
title_full Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures
title_fullStr Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures
title_full_unstemmed Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures
title_short Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures
title_sort non-pharmaceutical interventions for covid-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37611631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0130
work_keys_str_mv AT madhusudanananagha nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19asystematicreviewonenvironmentalcontrolmeasures
AT iddonchristopher nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19asystematicreviewonenvironmentalcontrolmeasures
AT cevikmuge nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19asystematicreviewonenvironmentalcontrolmeasures
AT naismithjamesh nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19asystematicreviewonenvironmentalcontrolmeasures
AT fitzgeraldshaun nonpharmaceuticalinterventionsforcovid19asystematicreviewonenvironmentalcontrolmeasures