Cargando…

Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The NICE guidelines for acute ureteric colic recommend diagnostic imaging, definitive management and definitive care within 24 and 48 h of symptoms and 4 weeks of temporisation, respectively. However, the NHS reality is fraught with long waiting times to definitive treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chibuzo, Ijeoma, Vucicevic, Aleksandar, Oliyide, Abisola, Adeyoju, Adebanji, Gall, Zara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.232
_version_ 1785094505663299584
author Chibuzo, Ijeoma
Vucicevic, Aleksandar
Oliyide, Abisola
Adeyoju, Adebanji
Gall, Zara
author_facet Chibuzo, Ijeoma
Vucicevic, Aleksandar
Oliyide, Abisola
Adeyoju, Adebanji
Gall, Zara
author_sort Chibuzo, Ijeoma
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The NICE guidelines for acute ureteric colic recommend diagnostic imaging, definitive management and definitive care within 24 and 48 h of symptoms and 4 weeks of temporisation, respectively. However, the NHS reality is fraught with long waiting times to definitive treatment, further compounded by a progressively increasing stone burden, paucity of on‐site lithotripters and a decrease in non‐cancer elective theatre sessions during the COVID‐19 pandemic. By the time patients attended the elective surgeries, their reference images (RIs) were often significantly out of date. Scant direction exists on what interval between imaging and surgery invalidates the usefulness of the RIs in providing surgical guidance. This study aimed to evaluate the role of imaging–surgery intervals (ISIs) on upper tract stone negative surgery outcomes and derive a cut‐off ISI warranting updated images, with a view to improving efficiency and patient safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper tract stone surgeries were retrospectively assessed. Each renal unit was considered independently in bilateral stones. Cases were grouped into renal/pelvic (referred to as ‘RENAL’) and URETERIC stones. Data retrieved included the ISI, intra‐operative disparity (IOD) between stone‐related features on RIs and the surgical findings. Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were used to determine ISI cut‐offs more predictive of IODs. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty‐seven surgeries on 174 (40.7%) RENAL and 253 (59.3%) URETERIC stones were appraised. No stones were found intraoperatively in 52 (12.1%) patients. Longer ISIs were associated with IODs, especially with URETERIC stones (p = 0.011, CI(95) 0.63; 4.84). The derived ROC ISI cut‐offs beyond which IODs, including negative surgeries, were more likely were 9 weeks for URETERIC (AUC: 63%, CI(95) 0.56; 0.70) and 19 weeks (AUC: 58.6%, CI(95) 0.50; 0.68) for RENAL stones, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a need to update reference imaging done more than 9 or 19 weeks before surgery for URETERIC and RENAL stones, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10447203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104472032023-08-25 Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones Chibuzo, Ijeoma Vucicevic, Aleksandar Oliyide, Abisola Adeyoju, Adebanji Gall, Zara BJUI Compass Original Articles INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The NICE guidelines for acute ureteric colic recommend diagnostic imaging, definitive management and definitive care within 24 and 48 h of symptoms and 4 weeks of temporisation, respectively. However, the NHS reality is fraught with long waiting times to definitive treatment, further compounded by a progressively increasing stone burden, paucity of on‐site lithotripters and a decrease in non‐cancer elective theatre sessions during the COVID‐19 pandemic. By the time patients attended the elective surgeries, their reference images (RIs) were often significantly out of date. Scant direction exists on what interval between imaging and surgery invalidates the usefulness of the RIs in providing surgical guidance. This study aimed to evaluate the role of imaging–surgery intervals (ISIs) on upper tract stone negative surgery outcomes and derive a cut‐off ISI warranting updated images, with a view to improving efficiency and patient safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper tract stone surgeries were retrospectively assessed. Each renal unit was considered independently in bilateral stones. Cases were grouped into renal/pelvic (referred to as ‘RENAL’) and URETERIC stones. Data retrieved included the ISI, intra‐operative disparity (IOD) between stone‐related features on RIs and the surgical findings. Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were used to determine ISI cut‐offs more predictive of IODs. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty‐seven surgeries on 174 (40.7%) RENAL and 253 (59.3%) URETERIC stones were appraised. No stones were found intraoperatively in 52 (12.1%) patients. Longer ISIs were associated with IODs, especially with URETERIC stones (p = 0.011, CI(95) 0.63; 4.84). The derived ROC ISI cut‐offs beyond which IODs, including negative surgeries, were more likely were 9 weeks for URETERIC (AUC: 63%, CI(95) 0.56; 0.70) and 19 weeks (AUC: 58.6%, CI(95) 0.50; 0.68) for RENAL stones, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a need to update reference imaging done more than 9 or 19 weeks before surgery for URETERIC and RENAL stones, respectively. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10447203/ /pubmed/37636215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.232 Text en © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chibuzo, Ijeoma
Vucicevic, Aleksandar
Oliyide, Abisola
Adeyoju, Adebanji
Gall, Zara
Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones
title Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones
title_full Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones
title_fullStr Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones
title_full_unstemmed Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones
title_short Optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones
title_sort optimising pre‐operative imaging–surgery intervals for stones
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.232
work_keys_str_mv AT chibuzoijeoma optimisingpreoperativeimagingsurgeryintervalsforstones
AT vucicevicaleksandar optimisingpreoperativeimagingsurgeryintervalsforstones
AT oliyideabisola optimisingpreoperativeimagingsurgeryintervalsforstones
AT adeyojuadebanji optimisingpreoperativeimagingsurgeryintervalsforstones
AT gallzara optimisingpreoperativeimagingsurgeryintervalsforstones