Cargando…
A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
BACKGROUND: Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography/contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA‐PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.243 |
_version_ | 1785094506956193792 |
---|---|
author | Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo Poulsen, Mads Hvid Hansen, Steinbjørn Vilstrup, Mie Holm Holm, Jorun Hess, Søren Holdgaard, Paw Christian Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold Madsen, Søren Sørensen Gerke, Oke Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup Dam, Johan Hygum Langkjær, Niels Østergaard, Louise Dorner Asmussen, Jon Thor Braad, Poul Erik Nørgaard, Birgitte Eiber, Matthias Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe |
author_facet | Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo Poulsen, Mads Hvid Hansen, Steinbjørn Vilstrup, Mie Holm Holm, Jorun Hess, Søren Holdgaard, Paw Christian Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold Madsen, Søren Sørensen Gerke, Oke Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup Dam, Johan Hygum Langkjær, Niels Østergaard, Louise Dorner Asmussen, Jon Thor Braad, Poul Erik Nørgaard, Birgitte Eiber, Matthias Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe |
author_sort | Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography/contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA‐PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression‐free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA‐PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)‐PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate‐ or high‐risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3–12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S‐20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021‐000123‐12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10447207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104472072023-08-25 A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo Poulsen, Mads Hvid Hansen, Steinbjørn Vilstrup, Mie Holm Holm, Jorun Hess, Søren Holdgaard, Paw Christian Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold Madsen, Søren Sørensen Gerke, Oke Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup Dam, Johan Hygum Langkjær, Niels Østergaard, Louise Dorner Asmussen, Jon Thor Braad, Poul Erik Nørgaard, Birgitte Eiber, Matthias Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe BJUI Compass Study Protocols BACKGROUND: Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography/contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA‐PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression‐free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA‐PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)‐PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate‐ or high‐risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3–12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S‐20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021‐000123‐12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10447207/ /pubmed/37636207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.243 Text en © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocols Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo Poulsen, Mads Hvid Hansen, Steinbjørn Vilstrup, Mie Holm Holm, Jorun Hess, Søren Holdgaard, Paw Christian Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold Madsen, Søren Sørensen Gerke, Oke Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup Dam, Johan Hygum Langkjær, Niels Østergaard, Louise Dorner Asmussen, Jon Thor Braad, Poul Erik Nørgaard, Birgitte Eiber, Matthias Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol |
title | A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol |
title_full | A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol |
title_fullStr | A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol |
title_short | A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol |
title_sort | randomised trial of [(18)f]psma‐1007‐pet/ct versus naf‐pet/ct for staging primary prostate cancer: a trial protocol |
topic | Study Protocols |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bucholsenkarenmiddelbo arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT poulsenmadshvid arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT hansensteinbjørn arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT vilstrupmieholm arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT holmjorun arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT hesssøren arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT holdgaardpawchristian arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT ziegerkarstenegbertarnold arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT madsensørensørensen arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT gerkeoke arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT pedersenkaspertholstrup arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT damjohanhygum arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT langkjærniels arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT østergaardlouisedorner arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT asmussenjonthor arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT braadpoulerik arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT nørgaardbirgitte arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT eibermatthias arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT hildebrandtmalenegrubbe arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT bucholsenkarenmiddelbo randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT poulsenmadshvid randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT hansensteinbjørn randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT vilstrupmieholm randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT holmjorun randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT hesssøren randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT holdgaardpawchristian randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT ziegerkarstenegbertarnold randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT madsensørensørensen randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT gerkeoke randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT pedersenkaspertholstrup randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT damjohanhygum randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT langkjærniels randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT østergaardlouisedorner randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT asmussenjonthor randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT braadpoulerik randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT nørgaardbirgitte randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT eibermatthias randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol AT hildebrandtmalenegrubbe randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol |