Cargando…

A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography/contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA‐PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo, Poulsen, Mads Hvid, Hansen, Steinbjørn, Vilstrup, Mie Holm, Holm, Jorun, Hess, Søren, Holdgaard, Paw Christian, Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold, Madsen, Søren Sørensen, Gerke, Oke, Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup, Dam, Johan Hygum, Langkjær, Niels, Østergaard, Louise Dorner, Asmussen, Jon Thor, Braad, Poul Erik, Nørgaard, Birgitte, Eiber, Matthias, Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.243
_version_ 1785094506956193792
author Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo
Poulsen, Mads Hvid
Hansen, Steinbjørn
Vilstrup, Mie Holm
Holm, Jorun
Hess, Søren
Holdgaard, Paw Christian
Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold
Madsen, Søren Sørensen
Gerke, Oke
Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup
Dam, Johan Hygum
Langkjær, Niels
Østergaard, Louise Dorner
Asmussen, Jon Thor
Braad, Poul Erik
Nørgaard, Birgitte
Eiber, Matthias
Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe
author_facet Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo
Poulsen, Mads Hvid
Hansen, Steinbjørn
Vilstrup, Mie Holm
Holm, Jorun
Hess, Søren
Holdgaard, Paw Christian
Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold
Madsen, Søren Sørensen
Gerke, Oke
Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup
Dam, Johan Hygum
Langkjær, Niels
Østergaard, Louise Dorner
Asmussen, Jon Thor
Braad, Poul Erik
Nørgaard, Birgitte
Eiber, Matthias
Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe
author_sort Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography/contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA‐PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression‐free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA‐PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)‐PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate‐ or high‐risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3–12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S‐20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021‐000123‐12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10447207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104472072023-08-25 A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo Poulsen, Mads Hvid Hansen, Steinbjørn Vilstrup, Mie Holm Holm, Jorun Hess, Søren Holdgaard, Paw Christian Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold Madsen, Søren Sørensen Gerke, Oke Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup Dam, Johan Hygum Langkjær, Niels Østergaard, Louise Dorner Asmussen, Jon Thor Braad, Poul Erik Nørgaard, Birgitte Eiber, Matthias Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe BJUI Compass Study Protocols BACKGROUND: Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography/contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA‐PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression‐free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA‐PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)‐PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate‐ or high‐risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[(18)F]F‐PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3–12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S‐20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021‐000123‐12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10447207/ /pubmed/37636207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.243 Text en © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocols
Buch‐Olsen, Karen Middelbo
Poulsen, Mads Hvid
Hansen, Steinbjørn
Vilstrup, Mie Holm
Holm, Jorun
Hess, Søren
Holdgaard, Paw Christian
Zieger, Karsten Egbert Arnold
Madsen, Søren Sørensen
Gerke, Oke
Pedersen, Kasper Tholstrup
Dam, Johan Hygum
Langkjær, Niels
Østergaard, Louise Dorner
Asmussen, Jon Thor
Braad, Poul Erik
Nørgaard, Birgitte
Eiber, Matthias
Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe
A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
title A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
title_full A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
title_fullStr A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
title_short A randomised trial of [(18)F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol
title_sort randomised trial of [(18)f]psma‐1007‐pet/ct versus naf‐pet/ct for staging primary prostate cancer: a trial protocol
topic Study Protocols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37636207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.243
work_keys_str_mv AT bucholsenkarenmiddelbo arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT poulsenmadshvid arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT hansensteinbjørn arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT vilstrupmieholm arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT holmjorun arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT hesssøren arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT holdgaardpawchristian arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT ziegerkarstenegbertarnold arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT madsensørensørensen arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT gerkeoke arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT pedersenkaspertholstrup arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT damjohanhygum arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT langkjærniels arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT østergaardlouisedorner arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT asmussenjonthor arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT braadpoulerik arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT nørgaardbirgitte arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT eibermatthias arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT hildebrandtmalenegrubbe arandomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT bucholsenkarenmiddelbo randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT poulsenmadshvid randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT hansensteinbjørn randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT vilstrupmieholm randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT holmjorun randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT hesssøren randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT holdgaardpawchristian randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT ziegerkarstenegbertarnold randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT madsensørensørensen randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT gerkeoke randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT pedersenkaspertholstrup randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT damjohanhygum randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT langkjærniels randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT østergaardlouisedorner randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT asmussenjonthor randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT braadpoulerik randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT nørgaardbirgitte randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT eibermatthias randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol
AT hildebrandtmalenegrubbe randomisedtrialof18fpsma1007petctversusnafpetctforstagingprimaryprostatecanceratrialprotocol