Cargando…
Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation
Although we have experienced some cases with discordant results between the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and conventional single gene tests for detecting EGFR alterations, the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in these discordant cases remains little known. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40271-w |
_version_ | 1785094548235485184 |
---|---|
author | Sakaguchi, Tadashi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Nishii, Yoichi Katsuta, Koji Yasui, Hiroki Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu |
author_facet | Sakaguchi, Tadashi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Nishii, Yoichi Katsuta, Koji Yasui, Hiroki Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu |
author_sort | Sakaguchi, Tadashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although we have experienced some cases with discordant results between the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and conventional single gene tests for detecting EGFR alterations, the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in these discordant cases remains little known. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer whose FFPE samples were simultaneously submitted for the ODxTT, and a PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with discordant results between the two tests, focusing on the common EGFR mutations. Among 444 successful results, 10 patients had discordant results for common EGFR mutations (9 Ex 19 deletion and 1 Ex 21 L858R mutation), and all of these were detected only by the PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. Among six discordant cases treated with EGFR-TKI, the mutations detected in 3 patients were not included in the list of detectable variants that are reportable by the ODxTT, while the mutations detected in the other 3 patients were included in the list. For all three discordant cases harboring the mutations not reportable by the ODxTT, good clinical responses were demonstrated. However, among the other three discordant cases harboring the mutations reportable by the ODxTT, only one patient had a clinical response with short duration. Among the discordant cases for common EGFR mutations between the ODxTT and the conventional single gene test, there are a certain number of suitable patients responsive to EGFR-TKIs, especially when the cause of the discordant results comes from the difference in the range of detectable variants that are reportable between the tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10447417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104474172023-08-25 Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation Sakaguchi, Tadashi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Nishii, Yoichi Katsuta, Koji Yasui, Hiroki Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu Sci Rep Article Although we have experienced some cases with discordant results between the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and conventional single gene tests for detecting EGFR alterations, the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in these discordant cases remains little known. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer whose FFPE samples were simultaneously submitted for the ODxTT, and a PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with discordant results between the two tests, focusing on the common EGFR mutations. Among 444 successful results, 10 patients had discordant results for common EGFR mutations (9 Ex 19 deletion and 1 Ex 21 L858R mutation), and all of these were detected only by the PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. Among six discordant cases treated with EGFR-TKI, the mutations detected in 3 patients were not included in the list of detectable variants that are reportable by the ODxTT, while the mutations detected in the other 3 patients were included in the list. For all three discordant cases harboring the mutations not reportable by the ODxTT, good clinical responses were demonstrated. However, among the other three discordant cases harboring the mutations reportable by the ODxTT, only one patient had a clinical response with short duration. Among the discordant cases for common EGFR mutations between the ODxTT and the conventional single gene test, there are a certain number of suitable patients responsive to EGFR-TKIs, especially when the cause of the discordant results comes from the difference in the range of detectable variants that are reportable between the tests. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10447417/ /pubmed/37612335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40271-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sakaguchi, Tadashi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Nishii, Yoichi Katsuta, Koji Yasui, Hiroki Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation |
title | Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation |
title_full | Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation |
title_fullStr | Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation |
title_short | Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation |
title_sort | clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the oncomine dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for egfr mutation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40271-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakaguchitadashi clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT iketaniakemi clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT esumiseiya clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT esumimaki clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT suzukiyuta clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT itokentaro clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT fujiwarakentaro clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT nishiiyoichi clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT katsutakoji clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT yasuihiroki clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT taguchiosamu clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation AT hatajiosamu clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation |