Cargando…

Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation

Although we have experienced some cases with discordant results between the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and conventional single gene tests for detecting EGFR alterations, the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in these discordant cases remains little known. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakaguchi, Tadashi, Iketani, Akemi, Esumi, Seiya, Esumi, Maki, Suzuki, Yuta, Ito, Kentaro, Fujiwara, Kentaro, Nishii, Yoichi, Katsuta, Koji, Yasui, Hiroki, Taguchi, Osamu, Hataji, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40271-w
_version_ 1785094548235485184
author Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Iketani, Akemi
Esumi, Seiya
Esumi, Maki
Suzuki, Yuta
Ito, Kentaro
Fujiwara, Kentaro
Nishii, Yoichi
Katsuta, Koji
Yasui, Hiroki
Taguchi, Osamu
Hataji, Osamu
author_facet Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Iketani, Akemi
Esumi, Seiya
Esumi, Maki
Suzuki, Yuta
Ito, Kentaro
Fujiwara, Kentaro
Nishii, Yoichi
Katsuta, Koji
Yasui, Hiroki
Taguchi, Osamu
Hataji, Osamu
author_sort Sakaguchi, Tadashi
collection PubMed
description Although we have experienced some cases with discordant results between the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and conventional single gene tests for detecting EGFR alterations, the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in these discordant cases remains little known. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer whose FFPE samples were simultaneously submitted for the ODxTT, and a PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with discordant results between the two tests, focusing on the common EGFR mutations. Among 444 successful results, 10 patients had discordant results for common EGFR mutations (9 Ex 19 deletion and 1 Ex 21 L858R mutation), and all of these were detected only by the PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. Among six discordant cases treated with EGFR-TKI, the mutations detected in 3 patients were not included in the list of detectable variants that are reportable by the ODxTT, while the mutations detected in the other 3 patients were included in the list. For all three discordant cases harboring the mutations not reportable by the ODxTT, good clinical responses were demonstrated. However, among the other three discordant cases harboring the mutations reportable by the ODxTT, only one patient had a clinical response with short duration. Among the discordant cases for common EGFR mutations between the ODxTT and the conventional single gene test, there are a certain number of suitable patients responsive to EGFR-TKIs, especially when the cause of the discordant results comes from the difference in the range of detectable variants that are reportable between the tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10447417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104474172023-08-25 Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation Sakaguchi, Tadashi Iketani, Akemi Esumi, Seiya Esumi, Maki Suzuki, Yuta Ito, Kentaro Fujiwara, Kentaro Nishii, Yoichi Katsuta, Koji Yasui, Hiroki Taguchi, Osamu Hataji, Osamu Sci Rep Article Although we have experienced some cases with discordant results between the Oncomine Dx target test (ODxTT) and conventional single gene tests for detecting EGFR alterations, the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in these discordant cases remains little known. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer whose FFPE samples were simultaneously submitted for the ODxTT, and a PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with discordant results between the two tests, focusing on the common EGFR mutations. Among 444 successful results, 10 patients had discordant results for common EGFR mutations (9 Ex 19 deletion and 1 Ex 21 L858R mutation), and all of these were detected only by the PNA-LNA PCR clamp test. Among six discordant cases treated with EGFR-TKI, the mutations detected in 3 patients were not included in the list of detectable variants that are reportable by the ODxTT, while the mutations detected in the other 3 patients were included in the list. For all three discordant cases harboring the mutations not reportable by the ODxTT, good clinical responses were demonstrated. However, among the other three discordant cases harboring the mutations reportable by the ODxTT, only one patient had a clinical response with short duration. Among the discordant cases for common EGFR mutations between the ODxTT and the conventional single gene test, there are a certain number of suitable patients responsive to EGFR-TKIs, especially when the cause of the discordant results comes from the difference in the range of detectable variants that are reportable between the tests. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10447417/ /pubmed/37612335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40271-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sakaguchi, Tadashi
Iketani, Akemi
Esumi, Seiya
Esumi, Maki
Suzuki, Yuta
Ito, Kentaro
Fujiwara, Kentaro
Nishii, Yoichi
Katsuta, Koji
Yasui, Hiroki
Taguchi, Osamu
Hataji, Osamu
Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation
title Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation
title_full Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation
title_fullStr Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation
title_short Clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the Oncomine Dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for EGFR mutation
title_sort clinical importance of the range of detectable variants between the oncomine dx target test and a conventional single-gene test for egfr mutation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40271-w
work_keys_str_mv AT sakaguchitadashi clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT iketaniakemi clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT esumiseiya clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT esumimaki clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT suzukiyuta clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT itokentaro clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT fujiwarakentaro clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT nishiiyoichi clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT katsutakoji clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT yasuihiroki clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT taguchiosamu clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation
AT hatajiosamu clinicalimportanceoftherangeofdetectablevariantsbetweentheoncominedxtargettestandaconventionalsinglegenetestforegfrmutation