Cargando…

STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3

PURPOSE: STOPP/START is a physiological systems-based explicit set of criteria that attempts to define the clinically important prescribing problems relating to potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs–STOPP criteria) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs–START criteria). The previous two ver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Mahony, Denis, Cherubini, Antonio, Guiteras, Anna Renom, Denkinger, Michael, Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste, Onder, Graziano, Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn, Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J., Knol, Wilma, Bahat, Gülistan, van der Velde, Nathalie, Petrovic, Mirko, Curtin, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y
_version_ 1785094585543819264
author O’Mahony, Denis
Cherubini, Antonio
Guiteras, Anna Renom
Denkinger, Michael
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
Onder, Graziano
Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn
Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J.
Knol, Wilma
Bahat, Gülistan
van der Velde, Nathalie
Petrovic, Mirko
Curtin, Denis
author_facet O’Mahony, Denis
Cherubini, Antonio
Guiteras, Anna Renom
Denkinger, Michael
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
Onder, Graziano
Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn
Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J.
Knol, Wilma
Bahat, Gülistan
van der Velde, Nathalie
Petrovic, Mirko
Curtin, Denis
author_sort O’Mahony, Denis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: STOPP/START is a physiological systems-based explicit set of criteria that attempts to define the clinically important prescribing problems relating to potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs–STOPP criteria) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs–START criteria). The previous two versions of STOPP/START criteria were published in 2008 and 2015. The present study describes the revised and updated third version of the criteria. METHODS: A detailed system-by-system review of the published literature from April 2014 to March 2022 was undertaken with the aim of including clinically important new explicit PIM and PPO criteria and removing any criteria considered to be no longer correct or outdated. A panel of 11 academic physicians with recognized expertise in geriatric pharmacotherapy from 8 European countries participated in a Delphi panel with the task of validating the draft criteria. The panel was presented with the draft new criteria using the SurveyMonkey® on-line platform in which panelists were asked to indicate their level of agreement on a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Two hundred and four evidence-based draft criteria (one hundred and forty-five STOPP criteria, fifty-nine START criteria) were presented to panelists for assessment using the Delphi validation method. Over the course of four rounds of Delphi validation, the panel achieved consensus on 133 STOPP criteria and 57 START criteria, i.e., 190 STOPP/START criteria in total representing a 66.7% increase in the number of criteria compared to STOPP/START version 2 published in 2015. CONCLUSION: A fully revised and updated version of STOPP/START criteria has been validated by a European expert panel using the Delphi consensus process. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10447584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104475842023-08-25 STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3 O’Mahony, Denis Cherubini, Antonio Guiteras, Anna Renom Denkinger, Michael Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste Onder, Graziano Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J. Knol, Wilma Bahat, Gülistan van der Velde, Nathalie Petrovic, Mirko Curtin, Denis Eur Geriatr Med Research Paper PURPOSE: STOPP/START is a physiological systems-based explicit set of criteria that attempts to define the clinically important prescribing problems relating to potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs–STOPP criteria) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs–START criteria). The previous two versions of STOPP/START criteria were published in 2008 and 2015. The present study describes the revised and updated third version of the criteria. METHODS: A detailed system-by-system review of the published literature from April 2014 to March 2022 was undertaken with the aim of including clinically important new explicit PIM and PPO criteria and removing any criteria considered to be no longer correct or outdated. A panel of 11 academic physicians with recognized expertise in geriatric pharmacotherapy from 8 European countries participated in a Delphi panel with the task of validating the draft criteria. The panel was presented with the draft new criteria using the SurveyMonkey® on-line platform in which panelists were asked to indicate their level of agreement on a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Two hundred and four evidence-based draft criteria (one hundred and forty-five STOPP criteria, fifty-nine START criteria) were presented to panelists for assessment using the Delphi validation method. Over the course of four rounds of Delphi validation, the panel achieved consensus on 133 STOPP criteria and 57 START criteria, i.e., 190 STOPP/START criteria in total representing a 66.7% increase in the number of criteria compared to STOPP/START version 2 published in 2015. CONCLUSION: A fully revised and updated version of STOPP/START criteria has been validated by a European expert panel using the Delphi consensus process. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10447584/ /pubmed/37256475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Paper
O’Mahony, Denis
Cherubini, Antonio
Guiteras, Anna Renom
Denkinger, Michael
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
Onder, Graziano
Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn
Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J.
Knol, Wilma
Bahat, Gülistan
van der Velde, Nathalie
Petrovic, Mirko
Curtin, Denis
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
title STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
title_full STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
title_fullStr STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
title_full_unstemmed STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
title_short STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
title_sort stopp/start criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y
work_keys_str_mv AT omahonydenis stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT cherubiniantonio stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT guiterasannarenom stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT denkingermichael stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT beuscartjeanbaptiste stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT ondergraziano stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT gudmundssonadalsteinn stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT cruzjentoftalfonsoj stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT knolwilma stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT bahatgulistan stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT vanderveldenathalie stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT petrovicmirko stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3
AT curtindenis stoppstartcriteriaforpotentiallyinappropriateprescribinginolderpeopleversion3