Cargando…

Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review

PURPOSE: Cognitive enhancers are the primary pharmacological therapy prescribed to those with dementia, comprising of memantine and the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs). The long-term cognitive and behavioural benefits of these medications, as well as their potential contribution to falls is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Portlock, Gabbie E., Smith, Matthew D., van Poelgeest, Eveline P., Welsh, Tomas James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00821-x
_version_ 1785094587216297984
author Portlock, Gabbie E.
Smith, Matthew D.
van Poelgeest, Eveline P.
Welsh, Tomas James
author_facet Portlock, Gabbie E.
Smith, Matthew D.
van Poelgeest, Eveline P.
Welsh, Tomas James
author_sort Portlock, Gabbie E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cognitive enhancers are the primary pharmacological therapy prescribed to those with dementia, comprising of memantine and the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs). The long-term cognitive and behavioural benefits of these medications, as well as their potential contribution to falls is currently debated, with recent Delphi studies being unable to reach consensus on whether these medications should be deprescribed. In this narrative clinical review, as part of a series on deprescribing in people at risk of falls, we explore the potential falls-related side effects experienced in people taking cognitive enhancers, alongside situations where deprescribing may be appropriate. METHODS: We undertook a literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar, using terms capturing falls and cognitive enhancers, as well as consulting the British National Formulary and published Summary of Medicinal Product Characteristics. These searches informed the subsequent clinical review. RESULTS: Cognitive enhancers should be subject to regular review, including confirmation of appropriate treatment indication, and occurrence of side effects in the context of falls. AChEIs, in particular, are associated with a broad range of side effects that can contribute to increased falls risk. These include bradycardia, syncope and neuromuscular effects. Where these have been identified, deprescribing should be considered, as well as alternative treatment options. Deprescribing studies have shown mixed results, likely due to considerable methodological heterogeneity. Several suggested guidelines exist to aid deprescribing decisions, many of which are highlighted in this review. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cognitive enhancers should be regularly reviewed and decisions to deprescribe made on a case-by-case basis, considering both the risks and benefits of stopping these medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10447592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104475922023-08-25 Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review Portlock, Gabbie E. Smith, Matthew D. van Poelgeest, Eveline P. Welsh, Tomas James Eur Geriatr Med Special Article PURPOSE: Cognitive enhancers are the primary pharmacological therapy prescribed to those with dementia, comprising of memantine and the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs). The long-term cognitive and behavioural benefits of these medications, as well as their potential contribution to falls is currently debated, with recent Delphi studies being unable to reach consensus on whether these medications should be deprescribed. In this narrative clinical review, as part of a series on deprescribing in people at risk of falls, we explore the potential falls-related side effects experienced in people taking cognitive enhancers, alongside situations where deprescribing may be appropriate. METHODS: We undertook a literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar, using terms capturing falls and cognitive enhancers, as well as consulting the British National Formulary and published Summary of Medicinal Product Characteristics. These searches informed the subsequent clinical review. RESULTS: Cognitive enhancers should be subject to regular review, including confirmation of appropriate treatment indication, and occurrence of side effects in the context of falls. AChEIs, in particular, are associated with a broad range of side effects that can contribute to increased falls risk. These include bradycardia, syncope and neuromuscular effects. Where these have been identified, deprescribing should be considered, as well as alternative treatment options. Deprescribing studies have shown mixed results, likely due to considerable methodological heterogeneity. Several suggested guidelines exist to aid deprescribing decisions, many of which are highlighted in this review. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cognitive enhancers should be regularly reviewed and decisions to deprescribe made on a case-by-case basis, considering both the risks and benefits of stopping these medications. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10447592/ /pubmed/37418063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00821-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Special Article
Portlock, Gabbie E.
Smith, Matthew D.
van Poelgeest, Eveline P.
Welsh, Tomas James
Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review
title Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review
title_full Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review
title_fullStr Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review
title_short Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review
title_sort therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults—a clinical review
topic Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00821-x
work_keys_str_mv AT portlockgabbiee therapeuticdilemmascognitiveenhancersandriskoffallinginolderadultsaclinicalreview
AT smithmatthewd therapeuticdilemmascognitiveenhancersandriskoffallinginolderadultsaclinicalreview
AT vanpoelgeestevelinep therapeuticdilemmascognitiveenhancersandriskoffallinginolderadultsaclinicalreview
AT welshtomasjames therapeuticdilemmascognitiveenhancersandriskoffallinginolderadultsaclinicalreview
AT therapeuticdilemmascognitiveenhancersandriskoffallinginolderadultsaclinicalreview