Cargando…
Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
PURPOSE: The management of patients with an anticipated difficult airway remains challenging. We evaluated laryngeal visualization with the recently introduced Vie Scope® as a straight blade laryngoscope consisting of an illuminated tube necessitating bougie-facilitated intubation vs Macintosh video...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y |
_version_ | 1785094587790917632 |
---|---|
author | Petzoldt, Martin Grün, Catharina Wünsch, Viktor A. Bauer, Marcus Hardel, Tim T. Grensemann, Jörn |
author_facet | Petzoldt, Martin Grün, Catharina Wünsch, Viktor A. Bauer, Marcus Hardel, Tim T. Grensemann, Jörn |
author_sort | Petzoldt, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The management of patients with an anticipated difficult airway remains challenging. We evaluated laryngeal visualization with the recently introduced Vie Scope® as a straight blade laryngoscope consisting of an illuminated tube necessitating bougie-facilitated intubation vs Macintosh videolaryngoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Patients undergoing elective ear, nose, and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery with an anticipated difficult airway were randomized 1:1 to receive tracheal intubation with the Vie Scope or Macintosh videolaryngoscope (C-MAC®). The primary outcome measure was laryngeal visualization by the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) scale. Secondary outcome measures were the time to successful intubation (TTI) and first-attempt and overall success rates. RESULTS: We included two sets of 29 patients in our analysis. For visualization, the Vie Scope was noninferior to videolaryngoscopy (VL) with mean (standard deviation [SD]) POGO scores of 71 (31)% vs 64 (30)% in the VL group [difference in means, 7 (8)%; 95% confidence interval, –9 to 23; P = 0.38]. Mean (SD) TTI was 125 (129) sec in the Vie Scope and 51 (36) sec in the VL group (difference in means, 75 sec; 95% confidence interval, 25 to 124; P = 0.005). The first-attempt and overall success rates were 22/29 (76%) and 27/29 (93%) in both groups. Two patients per group were switched to a different device. Four accidental esophageal intubations occurred in the Vie Scope group, these were presumably due to bougie misplacement. CONCLUSION: Visualization with the Vie Scope was noninferior to VL in patients with an anticipated difficult airway, but TTI was longer in the Vie Scope group. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05044416); registered 5 September 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article contains supplementary material available 10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10447594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104475942023-08-25 Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial Petzoldt, Martin Grün, Catharina Wünsch, Viktor A. Bauer, Marcus Hardel, Tim T. Grensemann, Jörn Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: The management of patients with an anticipated difficult airway remains challenging. We evaluated laryngeal visualization with the recently introduced Vie Scope® as a straight blade laryngoscope consisting of an illuminated tube necessitating bougie-facilitated intubation vs Macintosh videolaryngoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Patients undergoing elective ear, nose, and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery with an anticipated difficult airway were randomized 1:1 to receive tracheal intubation with the Vie Scope or Macintosh videolaryngoscope (C-MAC®). The primary outcome measure was laryngeal visualization by the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) scale. Secondary outcome measures were the time to successful intubation (TTI) and first-attempt and overall success rates. RESULTS: We included two sets of 29 patients in our analysis. For visualization, the Vie Scope was noninferior to videolaryngoscopy (VL) with mean (standard deviation [SD]) POGO scores of 71 (31)% vs 64 (30)% in the VL group [difference in means, 7 (8)%; 95% confidence interval, –9 to 23; P = 0.38]. Mean (SD) TTI was 125 (129) sec in the Vie Scope and 51 (36) sec in the VL group (difference in means, 75 sec; 95% confidence interval, 25 to 124; P = 0.005). The first-attempt and overall success rates were 22/29 (76%) and 27/29 (93%) in both groups. Two patients per group were switched to a different device. Four accidental esophageal intubations occurred in the Vie Scope group, these were presumably due to bougie misplacement. CONCLUSION: Visualization with the Vie Scope was noninferior to VL in patients with an anticipated difficult airway, but TTI was longer in the Vie Scope group. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05044416); registered 5 September 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article contains supplementary material available 10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y. Springer International Publishing 2023-08-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10447594/ /pubmed/37537324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reports of Original Investigations Petzoldt, Martin Grün, Catharina Wünsch, Viktor A. Bauer, Marcus Hardel, Tim T. Grensemann, Jörn Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | vie scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Reports of Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petzoldtmartin viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gruncatharina viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wunschviktora viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bauermarcus viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hardeltimt viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grensemannjorn viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial |