Cargando…

Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: The management of patients with an anticipated difficult airway remains challenging. We evaluated laryngeal visualization with the recently introduced Vie Scope® as a straight blade laryngoscope consisting of an illuminated tube necessitating bougie-facilitated intubation vs Macintosh video...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petzoldt, Martin, Grün, Catharina, Wünsch, Viktor A., Bauer, Marcus, Hardel, Tim T., Grensemann, Jörn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y
_version_ 1785094587790917632
author Petzoldt, Martin
Grün, Catharina
Wünsch, Viktor A.
Bauer, Marcus
Hardel, Tim T.
Grensemann, Jörn
author_facet Petzoldt, Martin
Grün, Catharina
Wünsch, Viktor A.
Bauer, Marcus
Hardel, Tim T.
Grensemann, Jörn
author_sort Petzoldt, Martin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The management of patients with an anticipated difficult airway remains challenging. We evaluated laryngeal visualization with the recently introduced Vie Scope® as a straight blade laryngoscope consisting of an illuminated tube necessitating bougie-facilitated intubation vs Macintosh videolaryngoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Patients undergoing elective ear, nose, and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery with an anticipated difficult airway were randomized 1:1 to receive tracheal intubation with the Vie Scope or Macintosh videolaryngoscope (C-MAC®). The primary outcome measure was laryngeal visualization by the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) scale. Secondary outcome measures were the time to successful intubation (TTI) and first-attempt and overall success rates. RESULTS: We included two sets of 29 patients in our analysis. For visualization, the Vie Scope was noninferior to videolaryngoscopy (VL) with mean (standard deviation [SD]) POGO scores of 71 (31)% vs 64 (30)% in the VL group [difference in means, 7 (8)%; 95% confidence interval, –9 to 23; P = 0.38]. Mean (SD) TTI was 125 (129) sec in the Vie Scope and 51 (36) sec in the VL group (difference in means, 75 sec; 95% confidence interval, 25 to 124; P = 0.005). The first-attempt and overall success rates were 22/29 (76%) and 27/29 (93%) in both groups. Two patients per group were switched to a different device. Four accidental esophageal intubations occurred in the Vie Scope group, these were presumably due to bougie misplacement. CONCLUSION: Visualization with the Vie Scope was noninferior to VL in patients with an anticipated difficult airway, but TTI was longer in the Vie Scope group. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05044416); registered 5 September 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article contains supplementary material available 10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10447594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104475942023-08-25 Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial Petzoldt, Martin Grün, Catharina Wünsch, Viktor A. Bauer, Marcus Hardel, Tim T. Grensemann, Jörn Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: The management of patients with an anticipated difficult airway remains challenging. We evaluated laryngeal visualization with the recently introduced Vie Scope® as a straight blade laryngoscope consisting of an illuminated tube necessitating bougie-facilitated intubation vs Macintosh videolaryngoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Patients undergoing elective ear, nose, and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery with an anticipated difficult airway were randomized 1:1 to receive tracheal intubation with the Vie Scope or Macintosh videolaryngoscope (C-MAC®). The primary outcome measure was laryngeal visualization by the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) scale. Secondary outcome measures were the time to successful intubation (TTI) and first-attempt and overall success rates. RESULTS: We included two sets of 29 patients in our analysis. For visualization, the Vie Scope was noninferior to videolaryngoscopy (VL) with mean (standard deviation [SD]) POGO scores of 71 (31)% vs 64 (30)% in the VL group [difference in means, 7 (8)%; 95% confidence interval, –9 to 23; P = 0.38]. Mean (SD) TTI was 125 (129) sec in the Vie Scope and 51 (36) sec in the VL group (difference in means, 75 sec; 95% confidence interval, 25 to 124; P = 0.005). The first-attempt and overall success rates were 22/29 (76%) and 27/29 (93%) in both groups. Two patients per group were switched to a different device. Four accidental esophageal intubations occurred in the Vie Scope group, these were presumably due to bougie misplacement. CONCLUSION: Visualization with the Vie Scope was noninferior to VL in patients with an anticipated difficult airway, but TTI was longer in the Vie Scope group. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05044416); registered 5 September 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article contains supplementary material available 10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y. Springer International Publishing 2023-08-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10447594/ /pubmed/37537324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Reports of Original Investigations
Petzoldt, Martin
Grün, Catharina
Wünsch, Viktor A.
Bauer, Marcus
Hardel, Tim T.
Grensemann, Jörn
Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
title Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort vie scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial
topic Reports of Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02534-y
work_keys_str_mv AT petzoldtmartin viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gruncatharina viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wunschviktora viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bauermarcus viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hardeltimt viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grensemannjorn viescopeversusvideolaryngoscopyinexpecteddifficultairwaysarandomizedcontrolledtrial