Cargando…

Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational. BACKGROUND: The use of social media by providers can enhance patient education, complement offline information, facilitate patient support, stimulate brand building, and strengthen the organization’s market position. Risks of social media include, but are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samtani, Rahul G., Webb, Antonio, Burleson, John, Berven, Sigurd, Theologis, Alekos, Abotsi, Edem, Burch, Shane, Deviren, Vedat, Haddas, Ram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211035716
_version_ 1785094650116177920
author Samtani, Rahul G.
Webb, Antonio
Burleson, John
Berven, Sigurd
Theologis, Alekos
Abotsi, Edem
Burch, Shane
Deviren, Vedat
Haddas, Ram
author_facet Samtani, Rahul G.
Webb, Antonio
Burleson, John
Berven, Sigurd
Theologis, Alekos
Abotsi, Edem
Burch, Shane
Deviren, Vedat
Haddas, Ram
author_sort Samtani, Rahul G.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational. BACKGROUND: The use of social media by providers can enhance patient education, complement offline information, facilitate patient support, stimulate brand building, and strengthen the organization’s market position. Risks of social media include, but are not limited to, a lack of quality, reliability, misrepresentation of credentials, influence of hidden and overt conflicts of interest, content that may jeopardize patient privacy, HIPAA regulations, and physicians’ credentials and licensure. Physicians’ use of social media may also expose him/her to lawsuits if providing specific medical advice on media platforms. OBJECTIVE: To document the social media presence of a broad cohort of spine surgeons, and to discuss the benefits and risks of a social media presence. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational of 325 Spine Surgeons from 76 institutions across the US. Description statistic and Pearson’s correlation were used to investigate the relationships between the variables. RESULTS: Out of the 325 surgeons, 96% were male with an average age of 51.5 ± 10.7 years and 14.1 ± 9.6 years of experience. The frequency of social media use included 57.2% of surgeons had professional LinkedIn, 17.8% had professional Facebook, and less than 16% had other social media platforms. When combining all platforms together, 64.6% of all surgeons had at least one professional social media platform. 64.0% of these surgeons had no social media activity in the past 90 days, while 19.4% and 10.9% were active once and twice a month, respectively. Surgeon age (P = 0.004), years in practice (P < 0.001), and practice type (P < 0.001) were strongly correlated with social media activity. CONCLUSIONS: Given the scarcity of research on this topic and the novelty of the platforms, social media and online services continue to be utilized at a low level by spine surgeons. Issues regarding the risks of privacy issues with social media users continue to be a concern among medical professionals adopting this technology. This can largely be mitigated with the combination of physician education and informed consent from patients. The ability to connect with patients directly, and provide access to high-quality education and information will be of considerable benefit to our field well into the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10448086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104480862023-08-25 Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century Samtani, Rahul G. Webb, Antonio Burleson, John Berven, Sigurd Theologis, Alekos Abotsi, Edem Burch, Shane Deviren, Vedat Haddas, Ram Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational. BACKGROUND: The use of social media by providers can enhance patient education, complement offline information, facilitate patient support, stimulate brand building, and strengthen the organization’s market position. Risks of social media include, but are not limited to, a lack of quality, reliability, misrepresentation of credentials, influence of hidden and overt conflicts of interest, content that may jeopardize patient privacy, HIPAA regulations, and physicians’ credentials and licensure. Physicians’ use of social media may also expose him/her to lawsuits if providing specific medical advice on media platforms. OBJECTIVE: To document the social media presence of a broad cohort of spine surgeons, and to discuss the benefits and risks of a social media presence. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational of 325 Spine Surgeons from 76 institutions across the US. Description statistic and Pearson’s correlation were used to investigate the relationships between the variables. RESULTS: Out of the 325 surgeons, 96% were male with an average age of 51.5 ± 10.7 years and 14.1 ± 9.6 years of experience. The frequency of social media use included 57.2% of surgeons had professional LinkedIn, 17.8% had professional Facebook, and less than 16% had other social media platforms. When combining all platforms together, 64.6% of all surgeons had at least one professional social media platform. 64.0% of these surgeons had no social media activity in the past 90 days, while 19.4% and 10.9% were active once and twice a month, respectively. Surgeon age (P = 0.004), years in practice (P < 0.001), and practice type (P < 0.001) were strongly correlated with social media activity. CONCLUSIONS: Given the scarcity of research on this topic and the novelty of the platforms, social media and online services continue to be utilized at a low level by spine surgeons. Issues regarding the risks of privacy issues with social media users continue to be a concern among medical professionals adopting this technology. This can largely be mitigated with the combination of physician education and informed consent from patients. The ability to connect with patients directly, and provide access to high-quality education and information will be of considerable benefit to our field well into the future. SAGE Publications 2021-08-03 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10448086/ /pubmed/34342239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211035716 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Samtani, Rahul G.
Webb, Antonio
Burleson, John
Berven, Sigurd
Theologis, Alekos
Abotsi, Edem
Burch, Shane
Deviren, Vedat
Haddas, Ram
Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century
title Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century
title_full Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century
title_fullStr Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century
title_full_unstemmed Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century
title_short Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century
title_sort spine surgeons social dilemma: benefits and risks of social media for spine surgery practice in the 21st century
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211035716
work_keys_str_mv AT samtanirahulg spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT webbantonio spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT burlesonjohn spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT bervensigurd spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT theologisalekos spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT abotsiedem spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT burchshane spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT devirenvedat spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury
AT haddasram spinesurgeonssocialdilemmabenefitsandrisksofsocialmediaforspinesurgerypracticeinthe21stcentury