Cargando…
Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Compilation of complication outcomes data from the surgical management of severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients using VCR-based vs non-VCR-based corrective maneuvers is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to compare complication outcomes bet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221146502 |
_version_ | 1785094655010930688 |
---|---|
author | Van Halm-Lutterodt, Nicholas Ishmael Al-Saidi, Neil Nazar Mandalia, Krishna Mesregah, Mohamed Kamal Ghanem, Kristina Marie Storlie, Nicholas Robert Huang, Wei-Hsun Chen, Wei-Cheng Bartels-Mensah, Mercy Chen, Xin Yuan Ye, Ziyang Zhang, Yangpu Pan, Aixing Kim, Sunny Sik Lonner, Baron Alanay, Ahmet Hai, Yong |
author_facet | Van Halm-Lutterodt, Nicholas Ishmael Al-Saidi, Neil Nazar Mandalia, Krishna Mesregah, Mohamed Kamal Ghanem, Kristina Marie Storlie, Nicholas Robert Huang, Wei-Hsun Chen, Wei-Cheng Bartels-Mensah, Mercy Chen, Xin Yuan Ye, Ziyang Zhang, Yangpu Pan, Aixing Kim, Sunny Sik Lonner, Baron Alanay, Ahmet Hai, Yong |
author_sort | Van Halm-Lutterodt, Nicholas Ishmael |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Compilation of complication outcomes data from the surgical management of severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients using VCR-based vs non-VCR-based corrective maneuvers is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to compare complication outcomes between those classified osteotomy approaches. METHODS: Thorough literature review and meta-analysis were conducted between January 2000 and September 2021. The selection criteria were studies: i) reporting major curve Cobb angle of ≥80° and flexibility of <25% or 30%; ii) comparing VCR or ≥ Type V Schwab osteotomy defined as VCR-based vs [non-VCR-based] techniques, (any osteotomy or technique other than VCR); iii) published in English with ≥10 patients; iv) reporting complication rates; and v) having minimum of 2-year follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Significance level was set at (P < .05). RESULTS: Of the 174 patients included, 52.30% (n = 91) and 47.70% (n = 83) were VCR-based and non-VCR-based, respectively. The incidence of dural tears/nerve injuries/significant intraoperative-neuromonitoring changes was significantly higher; [OR = 6.78, CI= (1.75 to 26.17), I2 = 0%, (P = .006)] in the VCR-based group than the non-VCR-based group. The ‘overall surgical and medical’ complication rate was significantly higher in the VCR-based group, [OR = 1.94, CI= (1.02 to 3.67), I2 = 31%, (P = .04)]. CONCLUSION: Both VCR-based and non-VCR-based surgical techniques for management of severe rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis patients pose comparable overall surgical complication rates, while a significantly higher perioperative neurological complication incidence was associated with VCR-based technique compared to the non-VCR-based techniques. The VCR-based technique was associated with 6.78 times higher incidence of neurological complications compared to non-VCR-based techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10448105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104481052023-08-25 Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Van Halm-Lutterodt, Nicholas Ishmael Al-Saidi, Neil Nazar Mandalia, Krishna Mesregah, Mohamed Kamal Ghanem, Kristina Marie Storlie, Nicholas Robert Huang, Wei-Hsun Chen, Wei-Cheng Bartels-Mensah, Mercy Chen, Xin Yuan Ye, Ziyang Zhang, Yangpu Pan, Aixing Kim, Sunny Sik Lonner, Baron Alanay, Ahmet Hai, Yong Global Spine J Review Articles STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Compilation of complication outcomes data from the surgical management of severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients using VCR-based vs non-VCR-based corrective maneuvers is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to compare complication outcomes between those classified osteotomy approaches. METHODS: Thorough literature review and meta-analysis were conducted between January 2000 and September 2021. The selection criteria were studies: i) reporting major curve Cobb angle of ≥80° and flexibility of <25% or 30%; ii) comparing VCR or ≥ Type V Schwab osteotomy defined as VCR-based vs [non-VCR-based] techniques, (any osteotomy or technique other than VCR); iii) published in English with ≥10 patients; iv) reporting complication rates; and v) having minimum of 2-year follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Significance level was set at (P < .05). RESULTS: Of the 174 patients included, 52.30% (n = 91) and 47.70% (n = 83) were VCR-based and non-VCR-based, respectively. The incidence of dural tears/nerve injuries/significant intraoperative-neuromonitoring changes was significantly higher; [OR = 6.78, CI= (1.75 to 26.17), I2 = 0%, (P = .006)] in the VCR-based group than the non-VCR-based group. The ‘overall surgical and medical’ complication rate was significantly higher in the VCR-based group, [OR = 1.94, CI= (1.02 to 3.67), I2 = 31%, (P = .04)]. CONCLUSION: Both VCR-based and non-VCR-based surgical techniques for management of severe rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis patients pose comparable overall surgical complication rates, while a significantly higher perioperative neurological complication incidence was associated with VCR-based technique compared to the non-VCR-based techniques. The VCR-based technique was associated with 6.78 times higher incidence of neurological complications compared to non-VCR-based techniques. SAGE Publications 2022-12-22 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10448105/ /pubmed/36548436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221146502 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Van Halm-Lutterodt, Nicholas Ishmael Al-Saidi, Neil Nazar Mandalia, Krishna Mesregah, Mohamed Kamal Ghanem, Kristina Marie Storlie, Nicholas Robert Huang, Wei-Hsun Chen, Wei-Cheng Bartels-Mensah, Mercy Chen, Xin Yuan Ye, Ziyang Zhang, Yangpu Pan, Aixing Kim, Sunny Sik Lonner, Baron Alanay, Ahmet Hai, Yong Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of overall complication rates in vcr-based vs non-vcr-based corrective techniques in severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221146502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhalmlutterodtnicholasishmael comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alsaidineilnazar comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mandaliakrishna comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mesregahmohamedkamal comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ghanemkristinamarie comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT storlienicholasrobert comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huangweihsun comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenweicheng comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bartelsmensahmercy comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenxinyuan comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yeziyang comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangyangpu comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panaixing comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimsunnysik comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lonnerbaron comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alanayahmet comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haiyong comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT comparisonofoverallcomplicationratesinvcrbasedvsnonvcrbasedcorrectivetechniquesinsevererigidkyphoscoliosispatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |