Cargando…

Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency

Quantification of microglial activation through morphometric analysis has long been a staple of the neuroimmunologist’s toolkit. Microglial morphological phenomics can be conducted through either manual classification or constructing a digital skeleton and extracting morphometric data from it. Multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddaway, Jack, Richardson, Peter Eulalio, Bevan, Ryan J., Stoneman, Jessica, Palombo, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2023.1211188
_version_ 1785094676305412096
author Reddaway, Jack
Richardson, Peter Eulalio
Bevan, Ryan J.
Stoneman, Jessica
Palombo, Marco
author_facet Reddaway, Jack
Richardson, Peter Eulalio
Bevan, Ryan J.
Stoneman, Jessica
Palombo, Marco
author_sort Reddaway, Jack
collection PubMed
description Quantification of microglial activation through morphometric analysis has long been a staple of the neuroimmunologist’s toolkit. Microglial morphological phenomics can be conducted through either manual classification or constructing a digital skeleton and extracting morphometric data from it. Multiple open-access and paid software packages are available to generate these skeletons via semi-automated and/or fully automated methods with varying degrees of accuracy. Despite advancements in methods to generate morphometrics (quantitative measures of cellular morphology), there has been limited development of tools to analyze the datasets they generate, in particular those containing parameters from tens of thousands of cells analyzed by fully automated pipelines. In this review, we compare and critique the approaches using cluster analysis and machine learning driven predictive algorithms that have been developed to tackle these large datasets, and propose improvements for these methods. In particular, we highlight the need for a commitment to open science from groups developing these classifiers. Furthermore, we call attention to a need for communication between those with a strong software engineering/computer science background and neuroimmunologists to produce effective analytical tools with simplified operability if we are to see their wide-spread adoption by the glia biology community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10448193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104481932023-08-25 Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency Reddaway, Jack Richardson, Peter Eulalio Bevan, Ryan J. Stoneman, Jessica Palombo, Marco Front Neuroinform Neuroscience Quantification of microglial activation through morphometric analysis has long been a staple of the neuroimmunologist’s toolkit. Microglial morphological phenomics can be conducted through either manual classification or constructing a digital skeleton and extracting morphometric data from it. Multiple open-access and paid software packages are available to generate these skeletons via semi-automated and/or fully automated methods with varying degrees of accuracy. Despite advancements in methods to generate morphometrics (quantitative measures of cellular morphology), there has been limited development of tools to analyze the datasets they generate, in particular those containing parameters from tens of thousands of cells analyzed by fully automated pipelines. In this review, we compare and critique the approaches using cluster analysis and machine learning driven predictive algorithms that have been developed to tackle these large datasets, and propose improvements for these methods. In particular, we highlight the need for a commitment to open science from groups developing these classifiers. Furthermore, we call attention to a need for communication between those with a strong software engineering/computer science background and neuroimmunologists to produce effective analytical tools with simplified operability if we are to see their wide-spread adoption by the glia biology community. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10448193/ /pubmed/37637472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2023.1211188 Text en Copyright © 2023 Reddaway, Richardson, Bevan, Stoneman and Palombo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Reddaway, Jack
Richardson, Peter Eulalio
Bevan, Ryan J.
Stoneman, Jessica
Palombo, Marco
Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency
title Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency
title_full Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency
title_fullStr Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency
title_full_unstemmed Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency
title_short Microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency
title_sort microglial morphometric analysis: so many options, so little consistency
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637472
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2023.1211188
work_keys_str_mv AT reddawayjack microglialmorphometricanalysissomanyoptionssolittleconsistency
AT richardsonpetereulalio microglialmorphometricanalysissomanyoptionssolittleconsistency
AT bevanryanj microglialmorphometricanalysissomanyoptionssolittleconsistency
AT stonemanjessica microglialmorphometricanalysissomanyoptionssolittleconsistency
AT palombomarco microglialmorphometricanalysissomanyoptionssolittleconsistency