Cargando…
Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma
To optimize specimen adequacy, our institution standardized technical 1st pull bone marrow aspirates (BMA) for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma. We are reporting assay performance characteristics from 556 MRD tests performed by flow cytometry. Ten million assay input was re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.008 |
_version_ | 1785094798698348544 |
---|---|
author | Foureau, David M. Paul, Barry A. Guo, Fei Lipford, Edward H. Fesenkova, Kateryna Tjaden, Elise Drummond, Kendra Bhutani, Manisha Atrash, Shebli Ndiaye, Ami Varga, Cindy Voorhees, Peter M. Usmani, Saad Z. |
author_facet | Foureau, David M. Paul, Barry A. Guo, Fei Lipford, Edward H. Fesenkova, Kateryna Tjaden, Elise Drummond, Kendra Bhutani, Manisha Atrash, Shebli Ndiaye, Ami Varga, Cindy Voorhees, Peter M. Usmani, Saad Z. |
author_sort | Foureau, David M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To optimize specimen adequacy, our institution standardized technical 1st pull bone marrow aspirates (BMA) for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma. We are reporting assay performance characteristics from 556 MRD tests performed by flow cytometry. Ten million assay input was reached for 97.5% of tests, 76% were not hemodiluted, allowing us to routinely achieve 1–2 × 10(−6) analytic sensitivity. INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is an established prognostic biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. Commonly used MRD testing techniques such as next generation sequencing or next generation flow cytometry can detect as little as one or two multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10(6) normal bone marrow cells. Early pull of bone marrow aspirates (BMA), necessary to achieve such level of sensitivity, can be difficult to secure in routine clinical practice due to the competing need for early pull samples for clinical response assessment, therefore introducing the risk of analytical interference during MRD testing. METHODS: To overcome this challenge, we standardized our workflow for collecting specimens by using a technical first pull after needle repositioning for MRD testing. To capture a comprehensive picture of MRD assay performance and specimen adequacy, we tested for MRD on 556 technical first pull bone marrow aspirates by next generation flow cytometry. Among the specimens, several key multiple myeloma treatment milestones were represented: end of induction therapy, two to three months post-autologous stem cell transplant, early and late stages of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: By using the technical first pull bone marrow aspirate, we achieved an analytical assay input of 10 million nucleated cells for 97.5% of specimens. Our analytical sensitivity reached 10(−6;) (i.e., 10 multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10 × 10(6) bone marrow cells). Twenty-four percent of specimens were significantly hemodiluted. Low assay input or hemodilution quantifiably lowered the assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Specimen adequacy is, therefore, an important metric to incorporate into MRD status reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10448729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104487292023-08-24 Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma Foureau, David M. Paul, Barry A. Guo, Fei Lipford, Edward H. Fesenkova, Kateryna Tjaden, Elise Drummond, Kendra Bhutani, Manisha Atrash, Shebli Ndiaye, Ami Varga, Cindy Voorhees, Peter M. Usmani, Saad Z. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Article To optimize specimen adequacy, our institution standardized technical 1st pull bone marrow aspirates (BMA) for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma. We are reporting assay performance characteristics from 556 MRD tests performed by flow cytometry. Ten million assay input was reached for 97.5% of tests, 76% were not hemodiluted, allowing us to routinely achieve 1–2 × 10(−6) analytic sensitivity. INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is an established prognostic biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. Commonly used MRD testing techniques such as next generation sequencing or next generation flow cytometry can detect as little as one or two multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10(6) normal bone marrow cells. Early pull of bone marrow aspirates (BMA), necessary to achieve such level of sensitivity, can be difficult to secure in routine clinical practice due to the competing need for early pull samples for clinical response assessment, therefore introducing the risk of analytical interference during MRD testing. METHODS: To overcome this challenge, we standardized our workflow for collecting specimens by using a technical first pull after needle repositioning for MRD testing. To capture a comprehensive picture of MRD assay performance and specimen adequacy, we tested for MRD on 556 technical first pull bone marrow aspirates by next generation flow cytometry. Among the specimens, several key multiple myeloma treatment milestones were represented: end of induction therapy, two to three months post-autologous stem cell transplant, early and late stages of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: By using the technical first pull bone marrow aspirate, we achieved an analytical assay input of 10 million nucleated cells for 97.5% of specimens. Our analytical sensitivity reached 10(−6;) (i.e., 10 multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10 × 10(6) bone marrow cells). Twenty-four percent of specimens were significantly hemodiluted. Low assay input or hemodilution quantifiably lowered the assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Specimen adequacy is, therefore, an important metric to incorporate into MRD status reporting. 2023-01 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10448729/ /pubmed/36443182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Foureau, David M. Paul, Barry A. Guo, Fei Lipford, Edward H. Fesenkova, Kateryna Tjaden, Elise Drummond, Kendra Bhutani, Manisha Atrash, Shebli Ndiaye, Ami Varga, Cindy Voorhees, Peter M. Usmani, Saad Z. Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma |
title | Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma |
title_full | Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma |
title_fullStr | Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma |
title_short | Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma |
title_sort | standardizing clinical workflow for assessing minimal residual disease by flow cytometry in multiple myeloma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foureaudavidm standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT paulbarrya standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT guofei standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT lipfordedwardh standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT fesenkovakateryna standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT tjadenelise standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT drummondkendra standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT bhutanimanisha standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT atrashshebli standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT ndiayeami standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT vargacindy standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT voorheespeterm standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma AT usmanisaadz standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma |