Cargando…

Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma

To optimize specimen adequacy, our institution standardized technical 1st pull bone marrow aspirates (BMA) for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma. We are reporting assay performance characteristics from 556 MRD tests performed by flow cytometry. Ten million assay input was re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foureau, David M., Paul, Barry A., Guo, Fei, Lipford, Edward H., Fesenkova, Kateryna, Tjaden, Elise, Drummond, Kendra, Bhutani, Manisha, Atrash, Shebli, Ndiaye, Ami, Varga, Cindy, Voorhees, Peter M., Usmani, Saad Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.008
_version_ 1785094798698348544
author Foureau, David M.
Paul, Barry A.
Guo, Fei
Lipford, Edward H.
Fesenkova, Kateryna
Tjaden, Elise
Drummond, Kendra
Bhutani, Manisha
Atrash, Shebli
Ndiaye, Ami
Varga, Cindy
Voorhees, Peter M.
Usmani, Saad Z.
author_facet Foureau, David M.
Paul, Barry A.
Guo, Fei
Lipford, Edward H.
Fesenkova, Kateryna
Tjaden, Elise
Drummond, Kendra
Bhutani, Manisha
Atrash, Shebli
Ndiaye, Ami
Varga, Cindy
Voorhees, Peter M.
Usmani, Saad Z.
author_sort Foureau, David M.
collection PubMed
description To optimize specimen adequacy, our institution standardized technical 1st pull bone marrow aspirates (BMA) for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma. We are reporting assay performance characteristics from 556 MRD tests performed by flow cytometry. Ten million assay input was reached for 97.5% of tests, 76% were not hemodiluted, allowing us to routinely achieve 1–2 × 10(−6) analytic sensitivity. INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is an established prognostic biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. Commonly used MRD testing techniques such as next generation sequencing or next generation flow cytometry can detect as little as one or two multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10(6) normal bone marrow cells. Early pull of bone marrow aspirates (BMA), necessary to achieve such level of sensitivity, can be difficult to secure in routine clinical practice due to the competing need for early pull samples for clinical response assessment, therefore introducing the risk of analytical interference during MRD testing. METHODS: To overcome this challenge, we standardized our workflow for collecting specimens by using a technical first pull after needle repositioning for MRD testing. To capture a comprehensive picture of MRD assay performance and specimen adequacy, we tested for MRD on 556 technical first pull bone marrow aspirates by next generation flow cytometry. Among the specimens, several key multiple myeloma treatment milestones were represented: end of induction therapy, two to three months post-autologous stem cell transplant, early and late stages of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: By using the technical first pull bone marrow aspirate, we achieved an analytical assay input of 10 million nucleated cells for 97.5% of specimens. Our analytical sensitivity reached 10(−6;) (i.e., 10 multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10 × 10(6) bone marrow cells). Twenty-four percent of specimens were significantly hemodiluted. Low assay input or hemodilution quantifiably lowered the assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Specimen adequacy is, therefore, an important metric to incorporate into MRD status reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10448729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104487292023-08-24 Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma Foureau, David M. Paul, Barry A. Guo, Fei Lipford, Edward H. Fesenkova, Kateryna Tjaden, Elise Drummond, Kendra Bhutani, Manisha Atrash, Shebli Ndiaye, Ami Varga, Cindy Voorhees, Peter M. Usmani, Saad Z. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Article To optimize specimen adequacy, our institution standardized technical 1st pull bone marrow aspirates (BMA) for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma. We are reporting assay performance characteristics from 556 MRD tests performed by flow cytometry. Ten million assay input was reached for 97.5% of tests, 76% were not hemodiluted, allowing us to routinely achieve 1–2 × 10(−6) analytic sensitivity. INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is an established prognostic biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. Commonly used MRD testing techniques such as next generation sequencing or next generation flow cytometry can detect as little as one or two multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10(6) normal bone marrow cells. Early pull of bone marrow aspirates (BMA), necessary to achieve such level of sensitivity, can be difficult to secure in routine clinical practice due to the competing need for early pull samples for clinical response assessment, therefore introducing the risk of analytical interference during MRD testing. METHODS: To overcome this challenge, we standardized our workflow for collecting specimens by using a technical first pull after needle repositioning for MRD testing. To capture a comprehensive picture of MRD assay performance and specimen adequacy, we tested for MRD on 556 technical first pull bone marrow aspirates by next generation flow cytometry. Among the specimens, several key multiple myeloma treatment milestones were represented: end of induction therapy, two to three months post-autologous stem cell transplant, early and late stages of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: By using the technical first pull bone marrow aspirate, we achieved an analytical assay input of 10 million nucleated cells for 97.5% of specimens. Our analytical sensitivity reached 10(−6;) (i.e., 10 multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10 × 10(6) bone marrow cells). Twenty-four percent of specimens were significantly hemodiluted. Low assay input or hemodilution quantifiably lowered the assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Specimen adequacy is, therefore, an important metric to incorporate into MRD status reporting. 2023-01 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10448729/ /pubmed/36443182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Article
Foureau, David M.
Paul, Barry A.
Guo, Fei
Lipford, Edward H.
Fesenkova, Kateryna
Tjaden, Elise
Drummond, Kendra
Bhutani, Manisha
Atrash, Shebli
Ndiaye, Ami
Varga, Cindy
Voorhees, Peter M.
Usmani, Saad Z.
Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma
title Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma
title_full Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma
title_short Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma
title_sort standardizing clinical workflow for assessing minimal residual disease by flow cytometry in multiple myeloma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36443182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.008
work_keys_str_mv AT foureaudavidm standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT paulbarrya standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT guofei standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT lipfordedwardh standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT fesenkovakateryna standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT tjadenelise standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT drummondkendra standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT bhutanimanisha standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT atrashshebli standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT ndiayeami standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT vargacindy standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT voorheespeterm standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma
AT usmanisaadz standardizingclinicalworkflowforassessingminimalresidualdiseasebyflowcytometryinmultiplemyeloma