Cargando…
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation
This final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted how par...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37609798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037 |
_version_ | 1785094818904408064 |
---|---|
author | Swaithes, Laura Campbell, Laura Anthierens, Sibyl Skrybant, Magdalena Schiphof, Dieuwke French, Helen de Wit, Maarten Blackburn, Steven Dziedzic, Krysia |
author_facet | Swaithes, Laura Campbell, Laura Anthierens, Sibyl Skrybant, Magdalena Schiphof, Dieuwke French, Helen de Wit, Maarten Blackburn, Steven Dziedzic, Krysia |
author_sort | Swaithes, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | This final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted how partnership working with patients and the public is important in transitioning from ‘what we know’ from the evidence-base to ‘what we do’ in practice. Factors related to Primary Care research that make public engagement important are highlighted e.g. implementing complex interventions, implementing interventions that increase health equity, implementing interventions in countries with different primary healthcare system strengths. Involvement of patients and public can enhance the development of modelling and simulation included in studies on systems modelling for improving health services. We draw on the emerging evidence base to describe public engagement in implementation and offer some guiding principles for engaging with the public in the implementation in General Practice and Primary Care in general. Illustrative case studies are included to support others wishing to offer meaningful engagement in implementing research evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10448833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104488332023-08-25 Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation Swaithes, Laura Campbell, Laura Anthierens, Sibyl Skrybant, Magdalena Schiphof, Dieuwke French, Helen de Wit, Maarten Blackburn, Steven Dziedzic, Krysia Eur J Gen Pract Opinion Paper This final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted how partnership working with patients and the public is important in transitioning from ‘what we know’ from the evidence-base to ‘what we do’ in practice. Factors related to Primary Care research that make public engagement important are highlighted e.g. implementing complex interventions, implementing interventions that increase health equity, implementing interventions in countries with different primary healthcare system strengths. Involvement of patients and public can enhance the development of modelling and simulation included in studies on systems modelling for improving health services. We draw on the emerging evidence base to describe public engagement in implementation and offer some guiding principles for engaging with the public in the implementation in General Practice and Primary Care in general. Illustrative case studies are included to support others wishing to offer meaningful engagement in implementing research evidence. Taylor & Francis 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10448833/ /pubmed/37609798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Paper Swaithes, Laura Campbell, Laura Anthierens, Sibyl Skrybant, Magdalena Schiphof, Dieuwke French, Helen de Wit, Maarten Blackburn, Steven Dziedzic, Krysia Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_full | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_fullStr | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_short | Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
title_sort | series: public engagement with research. part 4: maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation |
topic | Opinion Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10448833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37609798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swaitheslaura seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT campbelllaura seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT anthierenssibyl seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT skrybantmagdalena seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT schiphofdieuwke seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT frenchhelen seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT dewitmaarten seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT blackburnsteven seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation AT dziedzickrysia seriespublicengagementwithresearchpart4maximisingthebenefitsofinvolvingthepublicinresearchimplementation |