Cargando…

A propensity score matching investigation of short-term results of single-incision laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection via ileostomy site

AIMS: The study was performed to verify the results of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) through the ileostomy site for low rectal cancer compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2019 to November 2021, 133 patients with low rectal cancer un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Jianxiong, Ye, Pengcheng, Yang, Junsong, Feng, Yanchao, Qiu, Kai, Wei, Shoujiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695238
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_163_22
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: The study was performed to verify the results of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) through the ileostomy site for low rectal cancer compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2019 to November 2021, 133 patients with low rectal cancer underwent single-incision (n = 27) or conventional (n = 106) methods of low anterior rectal resection surgery with ileostomy. All patients were balanced by propensity score matching for basic information in a ratio of 1:2, resulting in 27 and 54 in SILS and CLS groups, respectively. RESULTS: Relative to the CLS group, the SILS group exhibited fewer leucocyte changes, shorter time to first exhaust and first bowel sounds, shorter length of hospital stay and lower Visual Analogue Score on post-operative days (POD2) and POD3. Intraoperative or post-operative complications or readmissions were comparable between the two groups. The oncologic results remained consistent between the two groups other than the number of lymph nodes dissected in group no. 253. CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision laparoscopic low rectal resection surgery through the ileostomy site has advantages in terms of reduced post-operative pain, shorter post-operative exhaust time and length of hospital stay while also achieving oncologic outcomes similar to those of conventional laparoscopy. It can be an alternative procedure for patients with low rectal cancer who require ileostomy.