Cargando…

A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre

BACKGROUND: Robotic cholecystectomy appears to be a natural evolution of the well-established gold standard procedure for gallstones, namely laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Akin to the early days of laparoscopy, robotic surgery is associated with a learning curve. We present our experiences in adaptin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chowbey, Pradeep, Dewan, Abhimanyu, Sharma, Anil, Khullar, Rajesh, Soni, Vandana, Baijal, Manish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282423
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_184_22
_version_ 1785094859921555456
author Chowbey, Pradeep
Dewan, Abhimanyu
Sharma, Anil
Khullar, Rajesh
Soni, Vandana
Baijal, Manish
author_facet Chowbey, Pradeep
Dewan, Abhimanyu
Sharma, Anil
Khullar, Rajesh
Soni, Vandana
Baijal, Manish
author_sort Chowbey, Pradeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic cholecystectomy appears to be a natural evolution of the well-established gold standard procedure for gallstones, namely laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Akin to the early days of laparoscopy, robotic surgery is associated with a learning curve. We present our experiences in adapting to robotic surgery after the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies at a minimal access surgery tertiary care hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first consecutive 100 robotic cholecystectomies performed by a single surgeon on the Versius robotic surgical system (CMR Surgical, UK) were included in the study. Patients unwilling to give consent and complex pathologies such as gangrene, perforation and cholecystoenteric fistulas were excluded from the study. Operative time, robotic setup time, incidence and indication for conversion to manual (laparoscopic) procedure were recorded while subjective assessment of interruptions due to machine alarms and errors was made. All data were compared between the first 50 and last 50 procedures. RESULTS: Our data revealed a gradual reduction in operative time from 28.53 min for the first 50 procedures to 22.06 min for the last 50 procedures. An improvement in draping and setup times was also noted, reducing from 7.74 to 5.14 min and 7.96 to 5.32 min, respectively. There were no conversions during the last 50 procedures, though the first 50 procedures resulted in 3 conversions to a laparoscopic procedure. In addition, we also noted a subjective reduction in the incidence of machine errors and alarms as we became more versed with the robotic system. CONCLUSION: Our single-centre experience indicates that newer modular robotic systems present a rapid and natural progression for experienced surgeons looking to venture into robotic surgery. The well-established advantages of robotic surgery in the form of enhanced ergonomics, three-dimensional vision and improved dexterity are validated as indispensable aids in a surgeon’s armamentarium. Our initial experience reveals that robotic surgery for more common surgical procedures such as cholecystectomies will be rapidly accepted, safe and effective. There is a need to innovate and expand the range of instrumentation and energy devices available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10449052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104490522023-08-25 A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre Chowbey, Pradeep Dewan, Abhimanyu Sharma, Anil Khullar, Rajesh Soni, Vandana Baijal, Manish J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Robotic cholecystectomy appears to be a natural evolution of the well-established gold standard procedure for gallstones, namely laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Akin to the early days of laparoscopy, robotic surgery is associated with a learning curve. We present our experiences in adapting to robotic surgery after the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies at a minimal access surgery tertiary care hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first consecutive 100 robotic cholecystectomies performed by a single surgeon on the Versius robotic surgical system (CMR Surgical, UK) were included in the study. Patients unwilling to give consent and complex pathologies such as gangrene, perforation and cholecystoenteric fistulas were excluded from the study. Operative time, robotic setup time, incidence and indication for conversion to manual (laparoscopic) procedure were recorded while subjective assessment of interruptions due to machine alarms and errors was made. All data were compared between the first 50 and last 50 procedures. RESULTS: Our data revealed a gradual reduction in operative time from 28.53 min for the first 50 procedures to 22.06 min for the last 50 procedures. An improvement in draping and setup times was also noted, reducing from 7.74 to 5.14 min and 7.96 to 5.32 min, respectively. There were no conversions during the last 50 procedures, though the first 50 procedures resulted in 3 conversions to a laparoscopic procedure. In addition, we also noted a subjective reduction in the incidence of machine errors and alarms as we became more versed with the robotic system. CONCLUSION: Our single-centre experience indicates that newer modular robotic systems present a rapid and natural progression for experienced surgeons looking to venture into robotic surgery. The well-established advantages of robotic surgery in the form of enhanced ergonomics, three-dimensional vision and improved dexterity are validated as indispensable aids in a surgeon’s armamentarium. Our initial experience reveals that robotic surgery for more common surgical procedures such as cholecystectomies will be rapidly accepted, safe and effective. There is a need to innovate and expand the range of instrumentation and energy devices available. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10449052/ /pubmed/37282423 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_184_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chowbey, Pradeep
Dewan, Abhimanyu
Sharma, Anil
Khullar, Rajesh
Soni, Vandana
Baijal, Manish
A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre
title A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre
title_full A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre
title_fullStr A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre
title_full_unstemmed A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre
title_short A review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre
title_sort review of the first 100 robotic cholecystectomies with a new cart-based surgical robot at a tertiary care centre
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37282423
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_184_22
work_keys_str_mv AT chowbeypradeep areviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT dewanabhimanyu areviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT sharmaanil areviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT khullarrajesh areviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT sonivandana areviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT baijalmanish areviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT chowbeypradeep reviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT dewanabhimanyu reviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT sharmaanil reviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT khullarrajesh reviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT sonivandana reviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre
AT baijalmanish reviewofthefirst100roboticcholecystectomieswithanewcartbasedsurgicalrobotatatertiarycarecentre