Cargando…

Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types

PURPOSE: To compare the maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and lip pressure in Class I, II, and III malocclusions and different facial types. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was carried out in 55 individuals (29 men and 26 women) aged between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães, Motta, Andréa Rodrigues, Neves, Leniana Santos, Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37436259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022102
_version_ 1785094868441235456
author Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães
Motta, Andréa Rodrigues
Neves, Leniana Santos
Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes
author_facet Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães
Motta, Andréa Rodrigues
Neves, Leniana Santos
Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes
author_sort Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and lip pressure in Class I, II, and III malocclusions and different facial types. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was carried out in 55 individuals (29 men and 26 women) aged between 18 and 55 years. The participants were divided into groups according to Angle malocclusion (Class I, II, and III) and facial type. The maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and maximum lip pressure were measured using the IOPI (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument). To determine the facial type, the cephalometric analysis was accomplished using Ricketts VERT analysis as a reference. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the maximum pressure of the anterior and posterior regions of the tongue, the maximum pressure of the lips, or the endurance of the tongue in the different Angle malocclusion types. Maximum posterior tongue pressure was lower in vertical individuals than in mesofacial individuals. CONCLUSION: Tongue and lips pressure, as well as tongue endurance in adults was not associated with the type of malocclusion. However, there is an association between facial type and the posterior pressure of the tongue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10449092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104490922023-08-25 Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães Motta, Andréa Rodrigues Neves, Leniana Santos Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Codas Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and lip pressure in Class I, II, and III malocclusions and different facial types. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was carried out in 55 individuals (29 men and 26 women) aged between 18 and 55 years. The participants were divided into groups according to Angle malocclusion (Class I, II, and III) and facial type. The maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and maximum lip pressure were measured using the IOPI (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument). To determine the facial type, the cephalometric analysis was accomplished using Ricketts VERT analysis as a reference. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the maximum pressure of the anterior and posterior regions of the tongue, the maximum pressure of the lips, or the endurance of the tongue in the different Angle malocclusion types. Maximum posterior tongue pressure was lower in vertical individuals than in mesofacial individuals. CONCLUSION: Tongue and lips pressure, as well as tongue endurance in adults was not associated with the type of malocclusion. However, there is an association between facial type and the posterior pressure of the tongue. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10449092/ /pubmed/37436259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022102 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães
Motta, Andréa Rodrigues
Neves, Leniana Santos
Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes
Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types
title Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types
title_full Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types
title_fullStr Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types
title_short Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types
title_sort evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with class i, ii, or iii angle malocclusions and different facial types
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37436259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022102
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsfernandaalvarengaguimaraes evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes
AT mottaandrearodrigues evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes
AT neveslenianasantos evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes
AT furlanrenatamariamoreiramoraes evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes