Cargando…
Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types
PURPOSE: To compare the maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and lip pressure in Class I, II, and III malocclusions and different facial types. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was carried out in 55 individuals (29 men and 26 women) aged between...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37436259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022102 |
_version_ | 1785094868441235456 |
---|---|
author | Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães Motta, Andréa Rodrigues Neves, Leniana Santos Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes |
author_facet | Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães Motta, Andréa Rodrigues Neves, Leniana Santos Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes |
author_sort | Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and lip pressure in Class I, II, and III malocclusions and different facial types. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was carried out in 55 individuals (29 men and 26 women) aged between 18 and 55 years. The participants were divided into groups according to Angle malocclusion (Class I, II, and III) and facial type. The maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and maximum lip pressure were measured using the IOPI (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument). To determine the facial type, the cephalometric analysis was accomplished using Ricketts VERT analysis as a reference. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the maximum pressure of the anterior and posterior regions of the tongue, the maximum pressure of the lips, or the endurance of the tongue in the different Angle malocclusion types. Maximum posterior tongue pressure was lower in vertical individuals than in mesofacial individuals. CONCLUSION: Tongue and lips pressure, as well as tongue endurance in adults was not associated with the type of malocclusion. However, there is an association between facial type and the posterior pressure of the tongue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10449092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104490922023-08-25 Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães Motta, Andréa Rodrigues Neves, Leniana Santos Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Codas Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and lip pressure in Class I, II, and III malocclusions and different facial types. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was carried out in 55 individuals (29 men and 26 women) aged between 18 and 55 years. The participants were divided into groups according to Angle malocclusion (Class I, II, and III) and facial type. The maximum anterior and posterior tongue pressure, tongue endurance, and maximum lip pressure were measured using the IOPI (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument). To determine the facial type, the cephalometric analysis was accomplished using Ricketts VERT analysis as a reference. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the maximum pressure of the anterior and posterior regions of the tongue, the maximum pressure of the lips, or the endurance of the tongue in the different Angle malocclusion types. Maximum posterior tongue pressure was lower in vertical individuals than in mesofacial individuals. CONCLUSION: Tongue and lips pressure, as well as tongue endurance in adults was not associated with the type of malocclusion. However, there is an association between facial type and the posterior pressure of the tongue. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10449092/ /pubmed/37436259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022102 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Martins, Fernanda Alvarenga Guimarães Motta, Andréa Rodrigues Neves, Leniana Santos Furlan, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types |
title | Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types |
title_full | Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types |
title_short | Evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with Class I, II, or III Angle malocclusions and different facial types |
title_sort | evaluation of the maximum tongue and lip pressure in individuals with class i, ii, or iii angle malocclusions and different facial types |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37436259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinsfernandaalvarengaguimaraes evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes AT mottaandrearodrigues evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes AT neveslenianasantos evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes AT furlanrenatamariamoreiramoraes evaluationofthemaximumtongueandlippressureinindividualswithclassiiioriiianglemalocclusionsanddifferentfacialtypes |