Cargando…

Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft

Background  This study aimed to assess predictors of a composite endpoint (reoperation for aortic valve [AV] failure or aortic regurgitation [AR] grade ≥ 2) after reimplantation of the aortic valve (RAV) using the Valsalva graft. Methods  From 2012 to 2021, 112 patients underwent RAV in a single cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Kristina, Carlestål, Emelie, Franco-Cereceda, Anders, Olsson, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37619566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768968
_version_ 1785094981191467008
author Ma, Kristina
Carlestål, Emelie
Franco-Cereceda, Anders
Olsson, Christian
author_facet Ma, Kristina
Carlestål, Emelie
Franco-Cereceda, Anders
Olsson, Christian
author_sort Ma, Kristina
collection PubMed
description Background  This study aimed to assess predictors of a composite endpoint (reoperation for aortic valve [AV] failure or aortic regurgitation [AR] grade ≥ 2) after reimplantation of the aortic valve (RAV) using the Valsalva graft. Methods  From 2012 to 2021, 112 patients underwent RAV in a single center. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the composite endpoint. Kaplan–Meier methods were used for time-to-event analysis. Results  Median (interquartile range) age was 52 years (44, 62). Nineteen patients (17%) were operated for acute Type A aortic dissection, and the remainder for aortic root aneurysm, 60 mm or larger in 12/112 (11%). Thirty-day mortality was 1/112 (1%). During follow-up, four patients (3.6%) were reoperated for AV failure, and another nine patients (8.1%) developed AR grade ≥ 2. Overall estimated freedom from reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2 was 87% (95% confidence interval: 76–93%) at 5 years. Significantly lower estimated 5-year freedom from the composite endpoint was found in cases with simultaneous aortic valve repair (AVr; 77 vs. 90%, p  = 0.007) and nearly significant for large (≥ 6 cm) aortic root diameter (82 vs. 87%, p  = 0.055). In Cox's analysis, aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were independent predictors for the composite endpoint. Conclusion  Outcomes (survival, reoperation, freedom from AR grade ≥ 2) with RAV were good up to 11-year follow-up. Larger aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were identified as predictors for reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2. Long-term follow-up remains necessary to confirm adequate AV function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10449566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104495662023-08-25 Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft Ma, Kristina Carlestål, Emelie Franco-Cereceda, Anders Olsson, Christian Aorta (Stamford) Background  This study aimed to assess predictors of a composite endpoint (reoperation for aortic valve [AV] failure or aortic regurgitation [AR] grade ≥ 2) after reimplantation of the aortic valve (RAV) using the Valsalva graft. Methods  From 2012 to 2021, 112 patients underwent RAV in a single center. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the composite endpoint. Kaplan–Meier methods were used for time-to-event analysis. Results  Median (interquartile range) age was 52 years (44, 62). Nineteen patients (17%) were operated for acute Type A aortic dissection, and the remainder for aortic root aneurysm, 60 mm or larger in 12/112 (11%). Thirty-day mortality was 1/112 (1%). During follow-up, four patients (3.6%) were reoperated for AV failure, and another nine patients (8.1%) developed AR grade ≥ 2. Overall estimated freedom from reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2 was 87% (95% confidence interval: 76–93%) at 5 years. Significantly lower estimated 5-year freedom from the composite endpoint was found in cases with simultaneous aortic valve repair (AVr; 77 vs. 90%, p  = 0.007) and nearly significant for large (≥ 6 cm) aortic root diameter (82 vs. 87%, p  = 0.055). In Cox's analysis, aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were independent predictors for the composite endpoint. Conclusion  Outcomes (survival, reoperation, freedom from AR grade ≥ 2) with RAV were good up to 11-year follow-up. Larger aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were identified as predictors for reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2. Long-term follow-up remains necessary to confirm adequate AV function. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10449566/ /pubmed/37619566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768968 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ma, Kristina
Carlestål, Emelie
Franco-Cereceda, Anders
Olsson, Christian
Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft
title Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft
title_full Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft
title_fullStr Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft
title_full_unstemmed Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft
title_short Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft
title_sort reoperation or aortic regurgitation progression after reimplantation of the aortic valve (david's procedure) using the valsalva graft
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37619566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768968
work_keys_str_mv AT makristina reoperationoraorticregurgitationprogressionafterreimplantationoftheaorticvalvedavidsprocedureusingthevalsalvagraft
AT carlestalemelie reoperationoraorticregurgitationprogressionafterreimplantationoftheaorticvalvedavidsprocedureusingthevalsalvagraft
AT francocerecedaanders reoperationoraorticregurgitationprogressionafterreimplantationoftheaorticvalvedavidsprocedureusingthevalsalvagraft
AT olssonchristian reoperationoraorticregurgitationprogressionafterreimplantationoftheaorticvalvedavidsprocedureusingthevalsalvagraft