Cargando…

Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study

BACKGROUND: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study showed that a short, non-contrast MRI detected more significant cancers with similar rates of biopsy compared to PSA. Herein, we compare the expected and perceived burden of PSA, MRI and ultrasound as screening tests. METHODS: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eldred-Evans, David, Winkler, Mathias, Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia, Burak, Paula, Connor, Martin J., Fiorentino, Francesca, Day, Emily, Price, Derek, Gammon, Martin, Tam, Henry, Sokhi, Heminder, Padhani, Anwar R., Ahmed, Hashim U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00662-6
_version_ 1785094998859972608
author Eldred-Evans, David
Winkler, Mathias
Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia
Burak, Paula
Connor, Martin J.
Fiorentino, Francesca
Day, Emily
Price, Derek
Gammon, Martin
Tam, Henry
Sokhi, Heminder
Padhani, Anwar R.
Ahmed, Hashim U.
author_facet Eldred-Evans, David
Winkler, Mathias
Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia
Burak, Paula
Connor, Martin J.
Fiorentino, Francesca
Day, Emily
Price, Derek
Gammon, Martin
Tam, Henry
Sokhi, Heminder
Padhani, Anwar R.
Ahmed, Hashim U.
author_sort Eldred-Evans, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study showed that a short, non-contrast MRI detected more significant cancers with similar rates of biopsy compared to PSA. Herein, we compare the expected and perceived burden of PSA, MRI and ultrasound as screening tests. METHODS: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, population-based, paired screening study of 408 men conducted at seven UK primary care practices and two imaging centres. The screening tests were serum PSA, non-contrast MRI and ultrasound. If any test was screen-positive, a prostate biopsy was performed. Participants completed an Expected Burden Questionnaire (EBQ) and Perceived Burden Questionnaire (PBQ) before and after each screening test. RESULTS: The overall level of burden for MRI and PSA was minimal. Few men reported high levels of anxiety, burden, embarrassment or pain following either MRI or PSA. Participants indicated an overall preference for MRI after completing all screening tests. Of 408 participants, 194 (47.5%) had no preference, 106 (26.0%) preferred MRI and 79 (19.4%) preferred PSA. This indicates that prior to screening, participants preferred MRI compared to PSA (+6.6%, 95% CI 4.4–8.4, p = 0.02) and after completing screening, the preference for MRI was higher (+21.1%, 95% CI 14.9–27.1, p < 0.001). The proportion of participants who strongly agreed with repeating the test was 50.5% for ultrasound, 65% for MRI and 68% for PSA. A larger proportion of participants found ultrasound anxiety-inducing, burdensome, embarrassing and painful compared to both MRI and PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Prostagram MRI and PSA are both acceptable as screening tests among men aged 50–69 years. Both tests were associated with minimal amounts of anxiety, burden, embarrassment and pain. The majority of participants preferred MRI over PSA and ultrasound. REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03702439.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10449626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104496262023-08-26 Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study Eldred-Evans, David Winkler, Mathias Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia Burak, Paula Connor, Martin J. Fiorentino, Francesca Day, Emily Price, Derek Gammon, Martin Tam, Henry Sokhi, Heminder Padhani, Anwar R. Ahmed, Hashim U. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study showed that a short, non-contrast MRI detected more significant cancers with similar rates of biopsy compared to PSA. Herein, we compare the expected and perceived burden of PSA, MRI and ultrasound as screening tests. METHODS: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, population-based, paired screening study of 408 men conducted at seven UK primary care practices and two imaging centres. The screening tests were serum PSA, non-contrast MRI and ultrasound. If any test was screen-positive, a prostate biopsy was performed. Participants completed an Expected Burden Questionnaire (EBQ) and Perceived Burden Questionnaire (PBQ) before and after each screening test. RESULTS: The overall level of burden for MRI and PSA was minimal. Few men reported high levels of anxiety, burden, embarrassment or pain following either MRI or PSA. Participants indicated an overall preference for MRI after completing all screening tests. Of 408 participants, 194 (47.5%) had no preference, 106 (26.0%) preferred MRI and 79 (19.4%) preferred PSA. This indicates that prior to screening, participants preferred MRI compared to PSA (+6.6%, 95% CI 4.4–8.4, p = 0.02) and after completing screening, the preference for MRI was higher (+21.1%, 95% CI 14.9–27.1, p < 0.001). The proportion of participants who strongly agreed with repeating the test was 50.5% for ultrasound, 65% for MRI and 68% for PSA. A larger proportion of participants found ultrasound anxiety-inducing, burdensome, embarrassing and painful compared to both MRI and PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Prostagram MRI and PSA are both acceptable as screening tests among men aged 50–69 years. Both tests were associated with minimal amounts of anxiety, burden, embarrassment and pain. The majority of participants preferred MRI over PSA and ultrasound. REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03702439. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10449626/ /pubmed/37002379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00662-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Eldred-Evans, David
Winkler, Mathias
Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia
Burak, Paula
Connor, Martin J.
Fiorentino, Francesca
Day, Emily
Price, Derek
Gammon, Martin
Tam, Henry
Sokhi, Heminder
Padhani, Anwar R.
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study
title Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study
title_full Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study
title_fullStr Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study
title_full_unstemmed Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study
title_short Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study
title_sort perceived patient burden and acceptability of mri in comparison to psa and ultrasound: results from the ip1-prostagram study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00662-6
work_keys_str_mv AT eldredevansdavid perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT winklermathias perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT klimowskanassarnatalia perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT burakpaula perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT connormartinj perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT fiorentinofrancesca perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT dayemily perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT pricederek perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT gammonmartin perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT tamhenry perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT sokhiheminder perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT padhanianwarr perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy
AT ahmedhashimu perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy