Cargando…
Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study
BACKGROUND: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study showed that a short, non-contrast MRI detected more significant cancers with similar rates of biopsy compared to PSA. Herein, we compare the expected and perceived burden of PSA, MRI and ultrasound as screening tests. METHODS: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00662-6 |
_version_ | 1785094998859972608 |
---|---|
author | Eldred-Evans, David Winkler, Mathias Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia Burak, Paula Connor, Martin J. Fiorentino, Francesca Day, Emily Price, Derek Gammon, Martin Tam, Henry Sokhi, Heminder Padhani, Anwar R. Ahmed, Hashim U. |
author_facet | Eldred-Evans, David Winkler, Mathias Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia Burak, Paula Connor, Martin J. Fiorentino, Francesca Day, Emily Price, Derek Gammon, Martin Tam, Henry Sokhi, Heminder Padhani, Anwar R. Ahmed, Hashim U. |
author_sort | Eldred-Evans, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study showed that a short, non-contrast MRI detected more significant cancers with similar rates of biopsy compared to PSA. Herein, we compare the expected and perceived burden of PSA, MRI and ultrasound as screening tests. METHODS: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, population-based, paired screening study of 408 men conducted at seven UK primary care practices and two imaging centres. The screening tests were serum PSA, non-contrast MRI and ultrasound. If any test was screen-positive, a prostate biopsy was performed. Participants completed an Expected Burden Questionnaire (EBQ) and Perceived Burden Questionnaire (PBQ) before and after each screening test. RESULTS: The overall level of burden for MRI and PSA was minimal. Few men reported high levels of anxiety, burden, embarrassment or pain following either MRI or PSA. Participants indicated an overall preference for MRI after completing all screening tests. Of 408 participants, 194 (47.5%) had no preference, 106 (26.0%) preferred MRI and 79 (19.4%) preferred PSA. This indicates that prior to screening, participants preferred MRI compared to PSA (+6.6%, 95% CI 4.4–8.4, p = 0.02) and after completing screening, the preference for MRI was higher (+21.1%, 95% CI 14.9–27.1, p < 0.001). The proportion of participants who strongly agreed with repeating the test was 50.5% for ultrasound, 65% for MRI and 68% for PSA. A larger proportion of participants found ultrasound anxiety-inducing, burdensome, embarrassing and painful compared to both MRI and PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Prostagram MRI and PSA are both acceptable as screening tests among men aged 50–69 years. Both tests were associated with minimal amounts of anxiety, burden, embarrassment and pain. The majority of participants preferred MRI over PSA and ultrasound. REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03702439. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10449626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104496262023-08-26 Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study Eldred-Evans, David Winkler, Mathias Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia Burak, Paula Connor, Martin J. Fiorentino, Francesca Day, Emily Price, Derek Gammon, Martin Tam, Henry Sokhi, Heminder Padhani, Anwar R. Ahmed, Hashim U. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study showed that a short, non-contrast MRI detected more significant cancers with similar rates of biopsy compared to PSA. Herein, we compare the expected and perceived burden of PSA, MRI and ultrasound as screening tests. METHODS: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, population-based, paired screening study of 408 men conducted at seven UK primary care practices and two imaging centres. The screening tests were serum PSA, non-contrast MRI and ultrasound. If any test was screen-positive, a prostate biopsy was performed. Participants completed an Expected Burden Questionnaire (EBQ) and Perceived Burden Questionnaire (PBQ) before and after each screening test. RESULTS: The overall level of burden for MRI and PSA was minimal. Few men reported high levels of anxiety, burden, embarrassment or pain following either MRI or PSA. Participants indicated an overall preference for MRI after completing all screening tests. Of 408 participants, 194 (47.5%) had no preference, 106 (26.0%) preferred MRI and 79 (19.4%) preferred PSA. This indicates that prior to screening, participants preferred MRI compared to PSA (+6.6%, 95% CI 4.4–8.4, p = 0.02) and after completing screening, the preference for MRI was higher (+21.1%, 95% CI 14.9–27.1, p < 0.001). The proportion of participants who strongly agreed with repeating the test was 50.5% for ultrasound, 65% for MRI and 68% for PSA. A larger proportion of participants found ultrasound anxiety-inducing, burdensome, embarrassing and painful compared to both MRI and PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Prostagram MRI and PSA are both acceptable as screening tests among men aged 50–69 years. Both tests were associated with minimal amounts of anxiety, burden, embarrassment and pain. The majority of participants preferred MRI over PSA and ultrasound. REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03702439. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10449626/ /pubmed/37002379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00662-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Eldred-Evans, David Winkler, Mathias Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia Burak, Paula Connor, Martin J. Fiorentino, Francesca Day, Emily Price, Derek Gammon, Martin Tam, Henry Sokhi, Heminder Padhani, Anwar R. Ahmed, Hashim U. Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study |
title | Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study |
title_full | Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study |
title_fullStr | Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study |
title_short | Perceived patient burden and acceptability of MRI in comparison to PSA and ultrasound: results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM study |
title_sort | perceived patient burden and acceptability of mri in comparison to psa and ultrasound: results from the ip1-prostagram study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00662-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eldredevansdavid perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT winklermathias perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT klimowskanassarnatalia perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT burakpaula perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT connormartinj perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT fiorentinofrancesca perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT dayemily perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT pricederek perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT gammonmartin perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT tamhenry perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT sokhiheminder perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT padhanianwarr perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy AT ahmedhashimu perceivedpatientburdenandacceptabilityofmriincomparisontopsaandultrasoundresultsfromtheip1prostagramstudy |