Cargando…

Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)

AIM: We evaluated a decision algorithm for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) based on a no-stent strategy, corresponding to a combination of scoring balloon angioplasty (SCBA) and drug-coated balloon (DCB), as a first line approach. Stents were used only in unstable patients, or in case of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meunier, Ludovic, Godin, Matthieu, Souteyrand, Géraud, Mottin, Benoît, Valy, Yann, Lordet, Vincent, Benoit, Christian, Bakdi, Ronan, Laurençon, Virginie, Genereux, Philippe, Waliszewski, Matthias, Allix-Béguec, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35776144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02054-7
_version_ 1785095013962612736
author Meunier, Ludovic
Godin, Matthieu
Souteyrand, Géraud
Mottin, Benoît
Valy, Yann
Lordet, Vincent
Benoit, Christian
Bakdi, Ronan
Laurençon, Virginie
Genereux, Philippe
Waliszewski, Matthias
Allix-Béguec, Caroline
author_facet Meunier, Ludovic
Godin, Matthieu
Souteyrand, Géraud
Mottin, Benoît
Valy, Yann
Lordet, Vincent
Benoit, Christian
Bakdi, Ronan
Laurençon, Virginie
Genereux, Philippe
Waliszewski, Matthias
Allix-Béguec, Caroline
author_sort Meunier, Ludovic
collection PubMed
description AIM: We evaluated a decision algorithm for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) based on a no-stent strategy, corresponding to a combination of scoring balloon angioplasty (SCBA) and drug-coated balloon (DCB), as a first line approach. Stents were used only in unstable patients, or in case of mandatory bailout stenting (BO-stent). METHODS: From April 2019 to March 2020, 984 consecutive patients, including 1922 lesions, underwent PCI. The 12-month primary end-point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and target lesion revascularization. Patients were classified into conventional or no-stent strategy groups according to the PCI strategy. In the no-stent strategy group, they were further classified into BO-stent or DCB-only groups. Their metal index was calculated by stent length divided by the total lesion length. RESULTS: The no-stent strategy was applied in 85% of the patients, and it was successful for 65% of them. MACE occurred in 7.1% of the study population, including 4.2% of all-cause death. Target lesion revascularization was required in 1.4%, 3.6%, and 1.5% of patients in the conventional DES, BO-stent, and DCB-only groups, respectively. MACE occurred more often in the elderly and in those treated with at least one stent (metal index greater than 0). CONCLUSIONS: The no-stent strategy, i.e., revascularization of coronary lesions by SCBA followed by DCB and with DES bailout stenting, was effective and safe at 1 year. This PCI approach was applicable on a daily practice in our cath lab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03893396, first posted on March 28, 2019). GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease. DES: drug eluting stent; SCBA: scoring balloon angioplasty; BO-stent: at least one stent; DCB: drug coated balloon; BMS: bare metal stent; Bailout (dash lines); MACE: major adverse cardiac event [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10449686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104496862023-08-26 Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study) Meunier, Ludovic Godin, Matthieu Souteyrand, Géraud Mottin, Benoît Valy, Yann Lordet, Vincent Benoit, Christian Bakdi, Ronan Laurençon, Virginie Genereux, Philippe Waliszewski, Matthias Allix-Béguec, Caroline Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper AIM: We evaluated a decision algorithm for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) based on a no-stent strategy, corresponding to a combination of scoring balloon angioplasty (SCBA) and drug-coated balloon (DCB), as a first line approach. Stents were used only in unstable patients, or in case of mandatory bailout stenting (BO-stent). METHODS: From April 2019 to March 2020, 984 consecutive patients, including 1922 lesions, underwent PCI. The 12-month primary end-point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and target lesion revascularization. Patients were classified into conventional or no-stent strategy groups according to the PCI strategy. In the no-stent strategy group, they were further classified into BO-stent or DCB-only groups. Their metal index was calculated by stent length divided by the total lesion length. RESULTS: The no-stent strategy was applied in 85% of the patients, and it was successful for 65% of them. MACE occurred in 7.1% of the study population, including 4.2% of all-cause death. Target lesion revascularization was required in 1.4%, 3.6%, and 1.5% of patients in the conventional DES, BO-stent, and DCB-only groups, respectively. MACE occurred more often in the elderly and in those treated with at least one stent (metal index greater than 0). CONCLUSIONS: The no-stent strategy, i.e., revascularization of coronary lesions by SCBA followed by DCB and with DES bailout stenting, was effective and safe at 1 year. This PCI approach was applicable on a daily practice in our cath lab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03893396, first posted on March 28, 2019). GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease. DES: drug eluting stent; SCBA: scoring balloon angioplasty; BO-stent: at least one stent; DCB: drug coated balloon; BMS: bare metal stent; Bailout (dash lines); MACE: major adverse cardiac event [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10449686/ /pubmed/35776144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02054-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Meunier, Ludovic
Godin, Matthieu
Souteyrand, Géraud
Mottin, Benoît
Valy, Yann
Lordet, Vincent
Benoit, Christian
Bakdi, Ronan
Laurençon, Virginie
Genereux, Philippe
Waliszewski, Matthias
Allix-Béguec, Caroline
Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)
title Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)
title_full Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)
title_fullStr Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)
title_full_unstemmed Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)
title_short Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study)
title_sort prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (scrap study)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35776144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02054-7
work_keys_str_mv AT meunierludovic prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT godinmatthieu prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT souteyrandgeraud prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT mottinbenoit prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT valyyann prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT lordetvincent prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT benoitchristian prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT bakdironan prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT laurenconvirginie prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT genereuxphilippe prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT waliszewskimatthias prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy
AT allixbegueccaroline prospectivesinglecentreevaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsfollowingadecisiontreeproposinganostentstrategyinstablepatientswithcoronaryarterydiseasescrapstudy