Cargando…

“Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study

PURPOSE: Various anatomical landmarks have become established in radiography for the assessment of cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most important one is Koehler's teardrop figure (KTF). However, there is a lack of data on the validity of this landmark, which is widely us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinz, Kristian, Nowack, Dimitri, von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger, Wassilew, Georgi, Matziolis, Georg, Brodt, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04859-1
_version_ 1785095081843228672
author Heinz, Kristian
Nowack, Dimitri
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Wassilew, Georgi
Matziolis, Georg
Brodt, Steffen
author_facet Heinz, Kristian
Nowack, Dimitri
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Wassilew, Georgi
Matziolis, Georg
Brodt, Steffen
author_sort Heinz, Kristian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Various anatomical landmarks have become established in radiography for the assessment of cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most important one is Koehler's teardrop figure (KTF). However, there is a lack of data on the validity of this landmark, which is widely used clinically for assessing the centre of rotation of the hip. METHOD: A retrospective measurement of the lateral and cranial distance of the KTF to the centre of hip rotation was performed on the basis of 250 X-ray images of patients who had undergone THA. In addition, the dependence of these distances on pelvic tilt was determined in 16 patients by means of virtual X-ray projections based on pelvic CTs. RESULTS: It was shown that the distance of the KTF from the centre of hip rotation in the horizontal plane is gender-dependent (men: 42.8 ± 6.0 mm vs. women: 37.4 ± 4.7 mm; p < 0.001) and age-dependent (Pearson correlation  – 0.114; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the vertical and horizontal distances are subject to variation depending on height (Pearson correlation 0.14; p < 0.05 and 0.40; p < 0.001, respectively) and weight (Pearson correlation 0.158; p < 0.05). The distance between the KTF and the centre of hip rotation varies slightly depending on pelvic tilt. CONCLUSION: The KTF is not a sufficiently valid landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after THA. It is influenced by many different disturbance variables. However, it is largely robust against changes in pelvic tilt, so that it can be used as a reference point when comparing different intraindividual radiographs to assess the change in the centre of rotation due to implantation or to detect cup migration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10449955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104499552023-08-26 “Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study Heinz, Kristian Nowack, Dimitri von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Wassilew, Georgi Matziolis, Georg Brodt, Steffen Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery PURPOSE: Various anatomical landmarks have become established in radiography for the assessment of cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most important one is Koehler's teardrop figure (KTF). However, there is a lack of data on the validity of this landmark, which is widely used clinically for assessing the centre of rotation of the hip. METHOD: A retrospective measurement of the lateral and cranial distance of the KTF to the centre of hip rotation was performed on the basis of 250 X-ray images of patients who had undergone THA. In addition, the dependence of these distances on pelvic tilt was determined in 16 patients by means of virtual X-ray projections based on pelvic CTs. RESULTS: It was shown that the distance of the KTF from the centre of hip rotation in the horizontal plane is gender-dependent (men: 42.8 ± 6.0 mm vs. women: 37.4 ± 4.7 mm; p < 0.001) and age-dependent (Pearson correlation  – 0.114; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the vertical and horizontal distances are subject to variation depending on height (Pearson correlation 0.14; p < 0.05 and 0.40; p < 0.001, respectively) and weight (Pearson correlation 0.158; p < 0.05). The distance between the KTF and the centre of hip rotation varies slightly depending on pelvic tilt. CONCLUSION: The KTF is not a sufficiently valid landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after THA. It is influenced by many different disturbance variables. However, it is largely robust against changes in pelvic tilt, so that it can be used as a reference point when comparing different intraindividual radiographs to assess the change in the centre of rotation due to implantation or to detect cup migration. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10449955/ /pubmed/37099164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04859-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Heinz, Kristian
Nowack, Dimitri
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Wassilew, Georgi
Matziolis, Georg
Brodt, Steffen
“Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study
title “Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study
title_full “Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study
title_fullStr “Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study
title_full_unstemmed “Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study
title_short “Koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after Total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study
title_sort “koehlers teardrop is not a reliable landmark for assessing the centre of rotation after total hip arthroplasty” – a retrospective radiological study
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04859-1
work_keys_str_mv AT heinzkristian koehlersteardropisnotareliablelandmarkforassessingthecentreofrotationaftertotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT nowackdimitri koehlersteardropisnotareliablelandmarkforassessingthecentreofrotationaftertotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT voneisenhartrotherudiger koehlersteardropisnotareliablelandmarkforassessingthecentreofrotationaftertotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT wassilewgeorgi koehlersteardropisnotareliablelandmarkforassessingthecentreofrotationaftertotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT matziolisgeorg koehlersteardropisnotareliablelandmarkforassessingthecentreofrotationaftertotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT brodtsteffen koehlersteardropisnotareliablelandmarkforassessingthecentreofrotationaftertotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveradiologicalstudy