Cargando…
A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
Agriculture faces potentially competing societal demands to produce food, fiber and fuel while reducing negative environmental impacts and delivering regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services. This necessitates a new generation of long-term agricultural field experiments designed to stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8 |
_version_ | 1785095092425457664 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xiaoxi Storkey, Jonathan Mead, Andrew Shield, Ian Clark, Ian Ostler, Richard Roberts, Beth Dobermann, Achim |
author_facet | Li, Xiaoxi Storkey, Jonathan Mead, Andrew Shield, Ian Clark, Ian Ostler, Richard Roberts, Beth Dobermann, Achim |
author_sort | Li, Xiaoxi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agriculture faces potentially competing societal demands to produce food, fiber and fuel while reducing negative environmental impacts and delivering regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services. This necessitates a new generation of long-term agricultural field experiments designed to study the behavior of contrasting cropping systems in terms of multiple outcomes. We document the principles and practices of a new long-term experiment of this type at Rothamsted, established at two contrasting sites in 2017 and 2018, and report initial yield data at the crop and system level. The objective of the Large-Scale Rotation Experiment was to establish gradients of system properties and outcomes to improve our fundamental understanding of UK cropping systems. It is composed of four management factors—phased rotations, cultivation (conventional vs reduced tillage), nutrition (additional organic amendment vs standard mineral fertilization) and crop protection (conventional vs smart crop protection). These factors were combined in a balanced design resulting in 24 emergent cropping systems at each site and can be analyzed at the level of the system or component management factors. We observed interactions between management factors and with the environment on crop yields, justifying the systems level, multi-site approach. Reduced tillage resulted in lower wheat yields but the effect varied with rotation, previous-crop and site. Organic amendments significantly increased spring barley yield by 8% on average though the effect again varied with site. The plowed cropping systems tended to produce higher caloric yield overall than systems under reduced tillage. Additional response variables are being monitored to study synergies and trade-offs with outcomes other than yield at the cropping system level. The experiment has been established as a long-term resource for inter-disciplinary research. By documenting the design process, we aim to facilitate the adoption of similar approaches to system-scale agricultural experimentation to inform the transition to more sustainable cropping systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10449994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104499942023-08-26 A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice Li, Xiaoxi Storkey, Jonathan Mead, Andrew Shield, Ian Clark, Ian Ostler, Richard Roberts, Beth Dobermann, Achim Agron Sustain Dev Research Article Agriculture faces potentially competing societal demands to produce food, fiber and fuel while reducing negative environmental impacts and delivering regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services. This necessitates a new generation of long-term agricultural field experiments designed to study the behavior of contrasting cropping systems in terms of multiple outcomes. We document the principles and practices of a new long-term experiment of this type at Rothamsted, established at two contrasting sites in 2017 and 2018, and report initial yield data at the crop and system level. The objective of the Large-Scale Rotation Experiment was to establish gradients of system properties and outcomes to improve our fundamental understanding of UK cropping systems. It is composed of four management factors—phased rotations, cultivation (conventional vs reduced tillage), nutrition (additional organic amendment vs standard mineral fertilization) and crop protection (conventional vs smart crop protection). These factors were combined in a balanced design resulting in 24 emergent cropping systems at each site and can be analyzed at the level of the system or component management factors. We observed interactions between management factors and with the environment on crop yields, justifying the systems level, multi-site approach. Reduced tillage resulted in lower wheat yields but the effect varied with rotation, previous-crop and site. Organic amendments significantly increased spring barley yield by 8% on average though the effect again varied with site. The plowed cropping systems tended to produce higher caloric yield overall than systems under reduced tillage. Additional response variables are being monitored to study synergies and trade-offs with outcomes other than yield at the cropping system level. The experiment has been established as a long-term resource for inter-disciplinary research. By documenting the design process, we aim to facilitate the adoption of similar approaches to system-scale agricultural experimentation to inform the transition to more sustainable cropping systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8. Springer Paris 2023-08-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10449994/ /pubmed/37637434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Xiaoxi Storkey, Jonathan Mead, Andrew Shield, Ian Clark, Ian Ostler, Richard Roberts, Beth Dobermann, Achim A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice |
title | A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice |
title_full | A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice |
title_fullStr | A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice |
title_full_unstemmed | A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice |
title_short | A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice |
title_sort | new rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixiaoxi anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT storkeyjonathan anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT meadandrew anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT shieldian anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT clarkian anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT ostlerrichard anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT robertsbeth anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT dobermannachim anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT lixiaoxi newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT storkeyjonathan newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT meadandrew newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT shieldian newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT clarkian newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT ostlerrichard newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT robertsbeth newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice AT dobermannachim newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice |