Cargando…

A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice

Agriculture faces potentially competing societal demands to produce food, fiber and fuel while reducing negative environmental impacts and delivering regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services. This necessitates a new generation of long-term agricultural field experiments designed to stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaoxi, Storkey, Jonathan, Mead, Andrew, Shield, Ian, Clark, Ian, Ostler, Richard, Roberts, Beth, Dobermann, Achim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8
_version_ 1785095092425457664
author Li, Xiaoxi
Storkey, Jonathan
Mead, Andrew
Shield, Ian
Clark, Ian
Ostler, Richard
Roberts, Beth
Dobermann, Achim
author_facet Li, Xiaoxi
Storkey, Jonathan
Mead, Andrew
Shield, Ian
Clark, Ian
Ostler, Richard
Roberts, Beth
Dobermann, Achim
author_sort Li, Xiaoxi
collection PubMed
description Agriculture faces potentially competing societal demands to produce food, fiber and fuel while reducing negative environmental impacts and delivering regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services. This necessitates a new generation of long-term agricultural field experiments designed to study the behavior of contrasting cropping systems in terms of multiple outcomes. We document the principles and practices of a new long-term experiment of this type at Rothamsted, established at two contrasting sites in 2017 and 2018, and report initial yield data at the crop and system level. The objective of the Large-Scale Rotation Experiment was to establish gradients of system properties and outcomes to improve our fundamental understanding of UK cropping systems. It is composed of four management factors—phased rotations, cultivation (conventional vs reduced tillage), nutrition (additional organic amendment vs standard mineral fertilization) and crop protection (conventional vs smart crop protection). These factors were combined in a balanced design resulting in 24 emergent cropping systems at each site and can be analyzed at the level of the system or component management factors. We observed interactions between management factors and with the environment on crop yields, justifying the systems level, multi-site approach. Reduced tillage resulted in lower wheat yields but the effect varied with rotation, previous-crop and site. Organic amendments significantly increased spring barley yield by 8% on average though the effect again varied with site. The plowed cropping systems tended to produce higher caloric yield overall than systems under reduced tillage. Additional response variables are being monitored to study synergies and trade-offs with outcomes other than yield at the cropping system level. The experiment has been established as a long-term resource for inter-disciplinary research. By documenting the design process, we aim to facilitate the adoption of similar approaches to system-scale agricultural experimentation to inform the transition to more sustainable cropping systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10449994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104499942023-08-26 A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice Li, Xiaoxi Storkey, Jonathan Mead, Andrew Shield, Ian Clark, Ian Ostler, Richard Roberts, Beth Dobermann, Achim Agron Sustain Dev Research Article Agriculture faces potentially competing societal demands to produce food, fiber and fuel while reducing negative environmental impacts and delivering regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services. This necessitates a new generation of long-term agricultural field experiments designed to study the behavior of contrasting cropping systems in terms of multiple outcomes. We document the principles and practices of a new long-term experiment of this type at Rothamsted, established at two contrasting sites in 2017 and 2018, and report initial yield data at the crop and system level. The objective of the Large-Scale Rotation Experiment was to establish gradients of system properties and outcomes to improve our fundamental understanding of UK cropping systems. It is composed of four management factors—phased rotations, cultivation (conventional vs reduced tillage), nutrition (additional organic amendment vs standard mineral fertilization) and crop protection (conventional vs smart crop protection). These factors were combined in a balanced design resulting in 24 emergent cropping systems at each site and can be analyzed at the level of the system or component management factors. We observed interactions between management factors and with the environment on crop yields, justifying the systems level, multi-site approach. Reduced tillage resulted in lower wheat yields but the effect varied with rotation, previous-crop and site. Organic amendments significantly increased spring barley yield by 8% on average though the effect again varied with site. The plowed cropping systems tended to produce higher caloric yield overall than systems under reduced tillage. Additional response variables are being monitored to study synergies and trade-offs with outcomes other than yield at the cropping system level. The experiment has been established as a long-term resource for inter-disciplinary research. By documenting the design process, we aim to facilitate the adoption of similar approaches to system-scale agricultural experimentation to inform the transition to more sustainable cropping systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8. Springer Paris 2023-08-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10449994/ /pubmed/37637434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xiaoxi
Storkey, Jonathan
Mead, Andrew
Shield, Ian
Clark, Ian
Ostler, Richard
Roberts, Beth
Dobermann, Achim
A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
title A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
title_full A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
title_fullStr A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
title_full_unstemmed A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
title_short A new Rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
title_sort new rothamsted long-term field experiment for the twenty-first century: principles and practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37637434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00914-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaoxi anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT storkeyjonathan anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT meadandrew anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT shieldian anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT clarkian anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT ostlerrichard anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT robertsbeth anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT dobermannachim anewrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT lixiaoxi newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT storkeyjonathan newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT meadandrew newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT shieldian newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT clarkian newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT ostlerrichard newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT robertsbeth newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice
AT dobermannachim newrothamstedlongtermfieldexperimentforthetwentyfirstcenturyprinciplesandpractice