Cargando…
Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
OBJECTIVES: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research has a well-established infrastructure in the UK, and while there has been good progress within pharmaceutical-industry-sponsored research, further improvements are still needed. This review aims to share learnings from quality ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071339 |
_version_ | 1785095115413389312 |
---|---|
author | Dews, Sally-Anne Bassi, Adit Buckland, Sean Clements, Lucy Daley, Rachel Davies, Angela Evett, Sophie Howland, Samantha Kinloch, Emma Phillips, Berkeley Powell, Gareth Preston, Jennifer Sterniczuk, Kamil Bohm, Natalie |
author_facet | Dews, Sally-Anne Bassi, Adit Buckland, Sean Clements, Lucy Daley, Rachel Davies, Angela Evett, Sophie Howland, Samantha Kinloch, Emma Phillips, Berkeley Powell, Gareth Preston, Jennifer Sterniczuk, Kamil Bohm, Natalie |
author_sort | Dews, Sally-Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research has a well-established infrastructure in the UK, and while there has been good progress within pharmaceutical-industry-sponsored research, further improvements are still needed. This review aims to share learnings from quality assessments of historical PPI projects within Pfizer UK to inform future projects and drive PPI progress in the pharmaceutical industry. DESIGN AND SETTING: Internal assessments of Pfizer UK PPI projects were conducted to identify all relevant projects across the medicines development continuum between 2017 and 2021. Five sample projects were developed into case studies. OUTCOME MEASURE: Retrospective quality assessments were performed using the Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD) Patient Engagement Quality Guidance (PEQG) tool. Recommendations for improvement were developed. RESULTS: Retrospective case study analysis and quality framework assessment revealed benefits of PPI to both Pfizer UK and to external partners, as well as challenges and learnings to improve future practice. Recommendations for improvement based on these findings focused on processes and procedures for PPI, group dynamics and diversity for PPI activities, sharing of expertise, the importance of bidirectional and timely feedback, and the use of understandable language in materials. CONCLUSIONS: PPI in medicines development is impactful and beneficial but is still being optimised in the pharmaceutical industry. Using the PFMD PEQG tool to define gaps, share learnings and devise recommendations for improvement helps to ensure that PPI is genuine and empowering, rather than tokenistic. Ultimately, these recommendations should be acted on to further embed PPI as an integral part of medicines development and health research within the pharmaceutical industry. This article includes a plain language summary in the supplement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10450071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104500712023-08-26 Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment Dews, Sally-Anne Bassi, Adit Buckland, Sean Clements, Lucy Daley, Rachel Davies, Angela Evett, Sophie Howland, Samantha Kinloch, Emma Phillips, Berkeley Powell, Gareth Preston, Jennifer Sterniczuk, Kamil Bohm, Natalie BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research has a well-established infrastructure in the UK, and while there has been good progress within pharmaceutical-industry-sponsored research, further improvements are still needed. This review aims to share learnings from quality assessments of historical PPI projects within Pfizer UK to inform future projects and drive PPI progress in the pharmaceutical industry. DESIGN AND SETTING: Internal assessments of Pfizer UK PPI projects were conducted to identify all relevant projects across the medicines development continuum between 2017 and 2021. Five sample projects were developed into case studies. OUTCOME MEASURE: Retrospective quality assessments were performed using the Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD) Patient Engagement Quality Guidance (PEQG) tool. Recommendations for improvement were developed. RESULTS: Retrospective case study analysis and quality framework assessment revealed benefits of PPI to both Pfizer UK and to external partners, as well as challenges and learnings to improve future practice. Recommendations for improvement based on these findings focused on processes and procedures for PPI, group dynamics and diversity for PPI activities, sharing of expertise, the importance of bidirectional and timely feedback, and the use of understandable language in materials. CONCLUSIONS: PPI in medicines development is impactful and beneficial but is still being optimised in the pharmaceutical industry. Using the PFMD PEQG tool to define gaps, share learnings and devise recommendations for improvement helps to ensure that PPI is genuine and empowering, rather than tokenistic. Ultimately, these recommendations should be acted on to further embed PPI as an integral part of medicines development and health research within the pharmaceutical industry. This article includes a plain language summary in the supplement. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10450071/ /pubmed/37612107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071339 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Dews, Sally-Anne Bassi, Adit Buckland, Sean Clements, Lucy Daley, Rachel Davies, Angela Evett, Sophie Howland, Samantha Kinloch, Emma Phillips, Berkeley Powell, Gareth Preston, Jennifer Sterniczuk, Kamil Bohm, Natalie Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment |
title | Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment |
title_full | Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment |
title_fullStr | Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment |
title_short | Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment |
title_sort | characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewssallyanne characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT bassiadit characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT bucklandsean characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT clementslucy characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT daleyrachel characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT daviesangela characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT evettsophie characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT howlandsamantha characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT kinlochemma characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT phillipsberkeley characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT powellgareth characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT prestonjennifer characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT sterniczukkamil characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment AT bohmnatalie characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment |