Cargando…

Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment

OBJECTIVES: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research has a well-established infrastructure in the UK, and while there has been good progress within pharmaceutical-industry-sponsored research, further improvements are still needed. This review aims to share learnings from quality ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dews, Sally-Anne, Bassi, Adit, Buckland, Sean, Clements, Lucy, Daley, Rachel, Davies, Angela, Evett, Sophie, Howland, Samantha, Kinloch, Emma, Phillips, Berkeley, Powell, Gareth, Preston, Jennifer, Sterniczuk, Kamil, Bohm, Natalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071339
_version_ 1785095115413389312
author Dews, Sally-Anne
Bassi, Adit
Buckland, Sean
Clements, Lucy
Daley, Rachel
Davies, Angela
Evett, Sophie
Howland, Samantha
Kinloch, Emma
Phillips, Berkeley
Powell, Gareth
Preston, Jennifer
Sterniczuk, Kamil
Bohm, Natalie
author_facet Dews, Sally-Anne
Bassi, Adit
Buckland, Sean
Clements, Lucy
Daley, Rachel
Davies, Angela
Evett, Sophie
Howland, Samantha
Kinloch, Emma
Phillips, Berkeley
Powell, Gareth
Preston, Jennifer
Sterniczuk, Kamil
Bohm, Natalie
author_sort Dews, Sally-Anne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research has a well-established infrastructure in the UK, and while there has been good progress within pharmaceutical-industry-sponsored research, further improvements are still needed. This review aims to share learnings from quality assessments of historical PPI projects within Pfizer UK to inform future projects and drive PPI progress in the pharmaceutical industry. DESIGN AND SETTING: Internal assessments of Pfizer UK PPI projects were conducted to identify all relevant projects across the medicines development continuum between 2017 and 2021. Five sample projects were developed into case studies. OUTCOME MEASURE: Retrospective quality assessments were performed using the Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD) Patient Engagement Quality Guidance (PEQG) tool. Recommendations for improvement were developed. RESULTS: Retrospective case study analysis and quality framework assessment revealed benefits of PPI to both Pfizer UK and to external partners, as well as challenges and learnings to improve future practice. Recommendations for improvement based on these findings focused on processes and procedures for PPI, group dynamics and diversity for PPI activities, sharing of expertise, the importance of bidirectional and timely feedback, and the use of understandable language in materials. CONCLUSIONS: PPI in medicines development is impactful and beneficial but is still being optimised in the pharmaceutical industry. Using the PFMD PEQG tool to define gaps, share learnings and devise recommendations for improvement helps to ensure that PPI is genuine and empowering, rather than tokenistic. Ultimately, these recommendations should be acted on to further embed PPI as an integral part of medicines development and health research within the pharmaceutical industry. This article includes a plain language summary in the supplement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10450071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104500712023-08-26 Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment Dews, Sally-Anne Bassi, Adit Buckland, Sean Clements, Lucy Daley, Rachel Davies, Angela Evett, Sophie Howland, Samantha Kinloch, Emma Phillips, Berkeley Powell, Gareth Preston, Jennifer Sterniczuk, Kamil Bohm, Natalie BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical research has a well-established infrastructure in the UK, and while there has been good progress within pharmaceutical-industry-sponsored research, further improvements are still needed. This review aims to share learnings from quality assessments of historical PPI projects within Pfizer UK to inform future projects and drive PPI progress in the pharmaceutical industry. DESIGN AND SETTING: Internal assessments of Pfizer UK PPI projects were conducted to identify all relevant projects across the medicines development continuum between 2017 and 2021. Five sample projects were developed into case studies. OUTCOME MEASURE: Retrospective quality assessments were performed using the Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD) Patient Engagement Quality Guidance (PEQG) tool. Recommendations for improvement were developed. RESULTS: Retrospective case study analysis and quality framework assessment revealed benefits of PPI to both Pfizer UK and to external partners, as well as challenges and learnings to improve future practice. Recommendations for improvement based on these findings focused on processes and procedures for PPI, group dynamics and diversity for PPI activities, sharing of expertise, the importance of bidirectional and timely feedback, and the use of understandable language in materials. CONCLUSIONS: PPI in medicines development is impactful and beneficial but is still being optimised in the pharmaceutical industry. Using the PFMD PEQG tool to define gaps, share learnings and devise recommendations for improvement helps to ensure that PPI is genuine and empowering, rather than tokenistic. Ultimately, these recommendations should be acted on to further embed PPI as an integral part of medicines development and health research within the pharmaceutical industry. This article includes a plain language summary in the supplement. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10450071/ /pubmed/37612107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071339 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Dews, Sally-Anne
Bassi, Adit
Buckland, Sean
Clements, Lucy
Daley, Rachel
Davies, Angela
Evett, Sophie
Howland, Samantha
Kinloch, Emma
Phillips, Berkeley
Powell, Gareth
Preston, Jennifer
Sterniczuk, Kamil
Bohm, Natalie
Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
title Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
title_full Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
title_fullStr Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
title_full_unstemmed Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
title_short Characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
title_sort characterising meaningful patient and public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry research setting: a retrospective quality assessment
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071339
work_keys_str_mv AT dewssallyanne characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT bassiadit characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT bucklandsean characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT clementslucy characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT daleyrachel characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT daviesangela characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT evettsophie characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT howlandsamantha characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT kinlochemma characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT phillipsberkeley characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT powellgareth characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT prestonjennifer characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT sterniczukkamil characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment
AT bohmnatalie characterisingmeaningfulpatientandpublicinvolvementinthepharmaceuticalindustryresearchsettingaretrospectivequalityassessment