Cargando…

Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants

OBJECTIVE: There are several equations for estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and each method has its limitations. We compared various estimated GFR (eGFR) equations with 24 hours urine creatinine clearance (24u-CCr). DESIGN: Sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Jin Ho, Oh, Sohee, Chin, Ho Jun, Kim, Sejoong, Kim, Dong Ki, Kim, Suhnggwon, Park, Jung Hwan, Shin, Sung Joon, Lee, Sang-Ho, Choi, Bum Soon, Lim, Chun Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067398
_version_ 1785095128456626176
author Hwang, Jin Ho
Oh, Sohee
Chin, Ho Jun
Kim, Sejoong
Kim, Dong Ki
Kim, Suhnggwon
Park, Jung Hwan
Shin, Sung Joon
Lee, Sang-Ho
Choi, Bum Soon
Lim, Chun Soo
author_facet Hwang, Jin Ho
Oh, Sohee
Chin, Ho Jun
Kim, Sejoong
Kim, Dong Ki
Kim, Suhnggwon
Park, Jung Hwan
Shin, Sung Joon
Lee, Sang-Ho
Choi, Bum Soon
Lim, Chun Soo
author_sort Hwang, Jin Ho
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There are several equations for estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and each method has its limitations. We compared various estimated GFR (eGFR) equations with 24 hours urine creatinine clearance (24u-CCr). DESIGN: Sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We compared the mean 24u-CCr values measured 2–3 times for 211 patients with eGFR values calculated using the following equations: isotope dilution mass spectrometry-Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (IDMS-MDRD) equation, Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, equations for Koreans (KOR-IDMS-MDRD and KOR-CKD-EPI) and full age spectrum equation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance of various creatinine-based eGFR equations, including those with Korean coefficients, compared with the results of the 24u-CCr. RESULTS: IDMS-MDRD showed the best overall correlation with the 24u-CCr (R=0.949, p<0.001), and KOR-CKD-EPI showed the best agreement in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 0.969, 95% CI 0.959 to 0.976, p<0.001). In subgroup analysis, IDMS-MDRD-GFR showed the highest ICCs in CKD stages 1 and 3 (ICC 0.872 in stage 1 and 0.927 in CKD stage 3, all p<0.001). KOR-CKD-EPI showed the highest ICC in CKD stage 2 (ICC 0.854, p<0.001). Overall, the accuracy of CKD-EPI (2021) was the highest at P15 (15%) and P30 (30%) (P15: 65.4 and P30: 97.6). In addition, CKD-EPI (2021) showed the highest P30 accuracy in CKD stage 1 (98.7), whereas KOR-IDMS-MDRD showed the highest P30 accuracy in CKD stages 2 and 3 (98.8 and 98.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The IDMS-MDRD equation showed the best correlation and overall good agreement with the 24u-CCr; however, the accuracy was low. The most accurate measurements were obtained using the CKD-EPI (2021) equation in CKD stage 1 and the KOR-IDMS-MDRD equation in CKD stages 2–3; nevertheless, the CKD-EPI (2021) equation showed the best overall accuracy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01552954.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10450128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104501282023-08-26 Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants Hwang, Jin Ho Oh, Sohee Chin, Ho Jun Kim, Sejoong Kim, Dong Ki Kim, Suhnggwon Park, Jung Hwan Shin, Sung Joon Lee, Sang-Ho Choi, Bum Soon Lim, Chun Soo BMJ Open Renal Medicine OBJECTIVE: There are several equations for estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and each method has its limitations. We compared various estimated GFR (eGFR) equations with 24 hours urine creatinine clearance (24u-CCr). DESIGN: Sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We compared the mean 24u-CCr values measured 2–3 times for 211 patients with eGFR values calculated using the following equations: isotope dilution mass spectrometry-Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (IDMS-MDRD) equation, Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, equations for Koreans (KOR-IDMS-MDRD and KOR-CKD-EPI) and full age spectrum equation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance of various creatinine-based eGFR equations, including those with Korean coefficients, compared with the results of the 24u-CCr. RESULTS: IDMS-MDRD showed the best overall correlation with the 24u-CCr (R=0.949, p<0.001), and KOR-CKD-EPI showed the best agreement in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 0.969, 95% CI 0.959 to 0.976, p<0.001). In subgroup analysis, IDMS-MDRD-GFR showed the highest ICCs in CKD stages 1 and 3 (ICC 0.872 in stage 1 and 0.927 in CKD stage 3, all p<0.001). KOR-CKD-EPI showed the highest ICC in CKD stage 2 (ICC 0.854, p<0.001). Overall, the accuracy of CKD-EPI (2021) was the highest at P15 (15%) and P30 (30%) (P15: 65.4 and P30: 97.6). In addition, CKD-EPI (2021) showed the highest P30 accuracy in CKD stage 1 (98.7), whereas KOR-IDMS-MDRD showed the highest P30 accuracy in CKD stages 2 and 3 (98.8 and 98.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The IDMS-MDRD equation showed the best correlation and overall good agreement with the 24u-CCr; however, the accuracy was low. The most accurate measurements were obtained using the CKD-EPI (2021) equation in CKD stage 1 and the KOR-IDMS-MDRD equation in CKD stages 2–3; nevertheless, the CKD-EPI (2021) equation showed the best overall accuracy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01552954. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10450128/ /pubmed/37612109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067398 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Renal Medicine
Hwang, Jin Ho
Oh, Sohee
Chin, Ho Jun
Kim, Sejoong
Kim, Dong Ki
Kim, Suhnggwon
Park, Jung Hwan
Shin, Sung Joon
Lee, Sang-Ho
Choi, Bum Soon
Lim, Chun Soo
Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants
title Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants
title_full Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants
title_fullStr Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants
title_short Comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants
title_sort comparison of the performance of currently used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations with 24-hour urine creatinine clearance: sample analysis of randomised controlled trial participants
topic Renal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37612109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067398
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangjinho comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT ohsohee comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT chinhojun comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT kimsejoong comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT kimdongki comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT kimsuhnggwon comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT parkjunghwan comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT shinsungjoon comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT leesangho comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT choibumsoon comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants
AT limchunsoo comparisonoftheperformanceofcurrentlyusedestimatedglomerularfiltrationrateequationswith24hoururinecreatinineclearancesampleanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrialparticipants