Cargando…
Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
[Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37552158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05240 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limited understanding of the relationships between cell components and performances. In this work, we investigate a Li–O(2) battery by originally screening different gas diffusion layers (GDLs) characterized by low specific surface area (<40 m(2) g(–1)) with relatively large pores (absence of micropores), graphitic character, and the presence of a fraction of the hydrophobic PTFE polymer on their surface (<20 wt %). The electrochemical characterization of Li–O(2) cells using bare GDLs as the support indicates that the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) occurs at potentials below 2.8 V vs Li(+)/Li, while the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) takes place at potentials higher than 3.6 V vs Li(+)/Li. Furthermore, the relatively high impedance of the Li–O(2) cells at the pristine state remarkably decreases upon electrochemical activation achieved by voltammetry. The Li–O(2) cells deliver high reversible capacities, ranging from ∼6 to ∼8 mA h cm(–2) (referred to the geometric area of the GDLs). The Li–O(2) battery performances are rationalized by the investigation of a practical Li(+) diffusion coefficient (D) within the cell configuration adopted herein. The study reveals that D is higher during ORR than during OER, with values depending on the characteristics of the GDL and on the cell state of charge. Overall, D values range from ∼10(–10) to ∼10(–8) cm(2) s(–1) during the ORR and ∼10(–17) to ∼10(–11) cm(2) s(–1) during the OER. The most performing GDL is used as the support for the deposition of a substrate formed by few-layer graphene and multiwalled carbon nanotubes to improve the reaction in a Li–O(2) cell operating with a maximum specific capacity of 1250 mA h g(–1) (1 mA h cm(–2)) at a current density of 0.33 mA cm(–2). XPS on the electrode tested in our Li–O(2) cell setup suggests the formation of a stable solid electrolyte interphase at the surface which extends the cycle life. |
---|