Cargando…
Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
[Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37552158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05240 |
_version_ | 1785095247718514688 |
---|---|
author | Levchenko, Stanislav Marangon, Vittorio Bellani, Sebastiano Pasquale, Lea Bonaccorso, Francesco Pellegrini, Vittorio Hassoun, Jusef |
author_facet | Levchenko, Stanislav Marangon, Vittorio Bellani, Sebastiano Pasquale, Lea Bonaccorso, Francesco Pellegrini, Vittorio Hassoun, Jusef |
author_sort | Levchenko, Stanislav |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limited understanding of the relationships between cell components and performances. In this work, we investigate a Li–O(2) battery by originally screening different gas diffusion layers (GDLs) characterized by low specific surface area (<40 m(2) g(–1)) with relatively large pores (absence of micropores), graphitic character, and the presence of a fraction of the hydrophobic PTFE polymer on their surface (<20 wt %). The electrochemical characterization of Li–O(2) cells using bare GDLs as the support indicates that the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) occurs at potentials below 2.8 V vs Li(+)/Li, while the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) takes place at potentials higher than 3.6 V vs Li(+)/Li. Furthermore, the relatively high impedance of the Li–O(2) cells at the pristine state remarkably decreases upon electrochemical activation achieved by voltammetry. The Li–O(2) cells deliver high reversible capacities, ranging from ∼6 to ∼8 mA h cm(–2) (referred to the geometric area of the GDLs). The Li–O(2) battery performances are rationalized by the investigation of a practical Li(+) diffusion coefficient (D) within the cell configuration adopted herein. The study reveals that D is higher during ORR than during OER, with values depending on the characteristics of the GDL and on the cell state of charge. Overall, D values range from ∼10(–10) to ∼10(–8) cm(2) s(–1) during the ORR and ∼10(–17) to ∼10(–11) cm(2) s(–1) during the OER. The most performing GDL is used as the support for the deposition of a substrate formed by few-layer graphene and multiwalled carbon nanotubes to improve the reaction in a Li–O(2) cell operating with a maximum specific capacity of 1250 mA h g(–1) (1 mA h cm(–2)) at a current density of 0.33 mA cm(–2). XPS on the electrode tested in our Li–O(2) cell setup suggests the formation of a stable solid electrolyte interphase at the surface which extends the cycle life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10450645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104506452023-08-26 Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate Levchenko, Stanislav Marangon, Vittorio Bellani, Sebastiano Pasquale, Lea Bonaccorso, Francesco Pellegrini, Vittorio Hassoun, Jusef ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limited understanding of the relationships between cell components and performances. In this work, we investigate a Li–O(2) battery by originally screening different gas diffusion layers (GDLs) characterized by low specific surface area (<40 m(2) g(–1)) with relatively large pores (absence of micropores), graphitic character, and the presence of a fraction of the hydrophobic PTFE polymer on their surface (<20 wt %). The electrochemical characterization of Li–O(2) cells using bare GDLs as the support indicates that the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) occurs at potentials below 2.8 V vs Li(+)/Li, while the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) takes place at potentials higher than 3.6 V vs Li(+)/Li. Furthermore, the relatively high impedance of the Li–O(2) cells at the pristine state remarkably decreases upon electrochemical activation achieved by voltammetry. The Li–O(2) cells deliver high reversible capacities, ranging from ∼6 to ∼8 mA h cm(–2) (referred to the geometric area of the GDLs). The Li–O(2) battery performances are rationalized by the investigation of a practical Li(+) diffusion coefficient (D) within the cell configuration adopted herein. The study reveals that D is higher during ORR than during OER, with values depending on the characteristics of the GDL and on the cell state of charge. Overall, D values range from ∼10(–10) to ∼10(–8) cm(2) s(–1) during the ORR and ∼10(–17) to ∼10(–11) cm(2) s(–1) during the OER. The most performing GDL is used as the support for the deposition of a substrate formed by few-layer graphene and multiwalled carbon nanotubes to improve the reaction in a Li–O(2) cell operating with a maximum specific capacity of 1250 mA h g(–1) (1 mA h cm(–2)) at a current density of 0.33 mA cm(–2). XPS on the electrode tested in our Li–O(2) cell setup suggests the formation of a stable solid electrolyte interphase at the surface which extends the cycle life. American Chemical Society 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10450645/ /pubmed/37552158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05240 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Levchenko, Stanislav Marangon, Vittorio Bellani, Sebastiano Pasquale, Lea Bonaccorso, Francesco Pellegrini, Vittorio Hassoun, Jusef Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate |
title | Influence of Ion
Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen
Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene
Substrate |
title_full | Influence of Ion
Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen
Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene
Substrate |
title_fullStr | Influence of Ion
Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen
Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene
Substrate |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Ion
Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen
Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene
Substrate |
title_short | Influence of Ion
Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen
Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene
Substrate |
title_sort | influence of ion
diffusion on the lithium–oxygen
electrochemical process and battery application using carbon nanotubes–graphene
substrate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37552158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levchenkostanislav influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate AT marangonvittorio influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate AT bellanisebastiano influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate AT pasqualelea influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate AT bonaccorsofrancesco influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate AT pellegrinivittorio influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate AT hassounjusef influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate |