Cargando…

Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate

[Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levchenko, Stanislav, Marangon, Vittorio, Bellani, Sebastiano, Pasquale, Lea, Bonaccorso, Francesco, Pellegrini, Vittorio, Hassoun, Jusef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37552158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05240
_version_ 1785095247718514688
author Levchenko, Stanislav
Marangon, Vittorio
Bellani, Sebastiano
Pasquale, Lea
Bonaccorso, Francesco
Pellegrini, Vittorio
Hassoun, Jusef
author_facet Levchenko, Stanislav
Marangon, Vittorio
Bellani, Sebastiano
Pasquale, Lea
Bonaccorso, Francesco
Pellegrini, Vittorio
Hassoun, Jusef
author_sort Levchenko, Stanislav
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limited understanding of the relationships between cell components and performances. In this work, we investigate a Li–O(2) battery by originally screening different gas diffusion layers (GDLs) characterized by low specific surface area (<40 m(2) g(–1)) with relatively large pores (absence of micropores), graphitic character, and the presence of a fraction of the hydrophobic PTFE polymer on their surface (<20 wt %). The electrochemical characterization of Li–O(2) cells using bare GDLs as the support indicates that the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) occurs at potentials below 2.8 V vs Li(+)/Li, while the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) takes place at potentials higher than 3.6 V vs Li(+)/Li. Furthermore, the relatively high impedance of the Li–O(2) cells at the pristine state remarkably decreases upon electrochemical activation achieved by voltammetry. The Li–O(2) cells deliver high reversible capacities, ranging from ∼6 to ∼8 mA h cm(–2) (referred to the geometric area of the GDLs). The Li–O(2) battery performances are rationalized by the investigation of a practical Li(+) diffusion coefficient (D) within the cell configuration adopted herein. The study reveals that D is higher during ORR than during OER, with values depending on the characteristics of the GDL and on the cell state of charge. Overall, D values range from ∼10(–10) to ∼10(–8) cm(2) s(–1) during the ORR and ∼10(–17) to ∼10(–11) cm(2) s(–1) during the OER. The most performing GDL is used as the support for the deposition of a substrate formed by few-layer graphene and multiwalled carbon nanotubes to improve the reaction in a Li–O(2) cell operating with a maximum specific capacity of 1250 mA h g(–1) (1 mA h cm(–2)) at a current density of 0.33 mA cm(–2). XPS on the electrode tested in our Li–O(2) cell setup suggests the formation of a stable solid electrolyte interphase at the surface which extends the cycle life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10450645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104506452023-08-26 Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate Levchenko, Stanislav Marangon, Vittorio Bellani, Sebastiano Pasquale, Lea Bonaccorso, Francesco Pellegrini, Vittorio Hassoun, Jusef ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Lithium–oxygen (Li–O(2)) batteries are nowadays among the most appealing next-generation energy storage systems in view of a high theoretical capacity and the use of transition-metal-free cathodes. Nevertheless, the practical application of these batteries is still hindered by limited understanding of the relationships between cell components and performances. In this work, we investigate a Li–O(2) battery by originally screening different gas diffusion layers (GDLs) characterized by low specific surface area (<40 m(2) g(–1)) with relatively large pores (absence of micropores), graphitic character, and the presence of a fraction of the hydrophobic PTFE polymer on their surface (<20 wt %). The electrochemical characterization of Li–O(2) cells using bare GDLs as the support indicates that the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) occurs at potentials below 2.8 V vs Li(+)/Li, while the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) takes place at potentials higher than 3.6 V vs Li(+)/Li. Furthermore, the relatively high impedance of the Li–O(2) cells at the pristine state remarkably decreases upon electrochemical activation achieved by voltammetry. The Li–O(2) cells deliver high reversible capacities, ranging from ∼6 to ∼8 mA h cm(–2) (referred to the geometric area of the GDLs). The Li–O(2) battery performances are rationalized by the investigation of a practical Li(+) diffusion coefficient (D) within the cell configuration adopted herein. The study reveals that D is higher during ORR than during OER, with values depending on the characteristics of the GDL and on the cell state of charge. Overall, D values range from ∼10(–10) to ∼10(–8) cm(2) s(–1) during the ORR and ∼10(–17) to ∼10(–11) cm(2) s(–1) during the OER. The most performing GDL is used as the support for the deposition of a substrate formed by few-layer graphene and multiwalled carbon nanotubes to improve the reaction in a Li–O(2) cell operating with a maximum specific capacity of 1250 mA h g(–1) (1 mA h cm(–2)) at a current density of 0.33 mA cm(–2). XPS on the electrode tested in our Li–O(2) cell setup suggests the formation of a stable solid electrolyte interphase at the surface which extends the cycle life. American Chemical Society 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10450645/ /pubmed/37552158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05240 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Levchenko, Stanislav
Marangon, Vittorio
Bellani, Sebastiano
Pasquale, Lea
Bonaccorso, Francesco
Pellegrini, Vittorio
Hassoun, Jusef
Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
title Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
title_full Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
title_fullStr Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
title_short Influence of Ion Diffusion on the Lithium–Oxygen Electrochemical Process and Battery Application Using Carbon Nanotubes–Graphene Substrate
title_sort influence of ion diffusion on the lithium–oxygen electrochemical process and battery application using carbon nanotubes–graphene substrate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10450645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37552158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05240
work_keys_str_mv AT levchenkostanislav influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate
AT marangonvittorio influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate
AT bellanisebastiano influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate
AT pasqualelea influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate
AT bonaccorsofrancesco influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate
AT pellegrinivittorio influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate
AT hassounjusef influenceofiondiffusiononthelithiumoxygenelectrochemicalprocessandbatteryapplicationusingcarbonnanotubesgraphenesubstrate