Cargando…

The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct

Monolateral pin-to-bar-clamp fixators are commonly used to stabilize acute extremity injuries. Certain rules regarding frame geometry have been established that affect construct stability. The influence of sagittal pin angulation on construct stiffness and strength has not been investigated. The pur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klemeit, Axel, Weber, Anna, Bourauel, Christoph, Welle, Kristian, Burger, Christof, Schildberg, Frank A., Deborre, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10451265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080982
_version_ 1785095396564926464
author Klemeit, Axel
Weber, Anna
Bourauel, Christoph
Welle, Kristian
Burger, Christof
Schildberg, Frank A.
Deborre, Christoph
author_facet Klemeit, Axel
Weber, Anna
Bourauel, Christoph
Welle, Kristian
Burger, Christof
Schildberg, Frank A.
Deborre, Christoph
author_sort Klemeit, Axel
collection PubMed
description Monolateral pin-to-bar-clamp fixators are commonly used to stabilize acute extremity injuries. Certain rules regarding frame geometry have been established that affect construct stability. The influence of sagittal pin angulation on construct stiffness and strength has not been investigated. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to demonstrate the effect of a pin angulation in the monolateral fixator using a composite cylinder model. Three groups of composite cylinder models with a fracture gap were loaded with different mounting variants of monolateral pin-to-bar-clamp fixators. In the first group, the pins were set parallel to each other and perpendicular to the specimen. In the second group, both pins were set convergent each in an angle of 15° to the specimen. In the third group, the pins were set each 15° divergent. The strength of the constructions was tested using a mechanical testing machine. This was followed by a cyclic loading test to produce pin loosening. A pull-out test was then performed to evaluate the strength of each construct at the pin–bone interface. Initial stiffness analyses showed that the converging configuration was the stiffest, while the diverging configuration was the least stiff. The parallel mounting showed an intermediate stiffness. There was a significantly higher resistance to pull-out force in the diverging pin configuration compared to the converging pin configuration. There was no significant difference in the pull-out strength of the parallel pins compared to the angled pin pairs. Convergent mounting of pin pairs increases the stiffness of a monolateral fixator, whereas a divergent mounting weakens it. Regarding the strength of the pin–bone interface, the divergent pin configuration appears to provide greater resistance to pull-out force than the convergent one. The results of this pilot study should be important for the doctrine of fixator mounting as well as for fixator component design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10451265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104512652023-08-26 The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct Klemeit, Axel Weber, Anna Bourauel, Christoph Welle, Kristian Burger, Christof Schildberg, Frank A. Deborre, Christoph Bioengineering (Basel) Article Monolateral pin-to-bar-clamp fixators are commonly used to stabilize acute extremity injuries. Certain rules regarding frame geometry have been established that affect construct stability. The influence of sagittal pin angulation on construct stiffness and strength has not been investigated. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to demonstrate the effect of a pin angulation in the monolateral fixator using a composite cylinder model. Three groups of composite cylinder models with a fracture gap were loaded with different mounting variants of monolateral pin-to-bar-clamp fixators. In the first group, the pins were set parallel to each other and perpendicular to the specimen. In the second group, both pins were set convergent each in an angle of 15° to the specimen. In the third group, the pins were set each 15° divergent. The strength of the constructions was tested using a mechanical testing machine. This was followed by a cyclic loading test to produce pin loosening. A pull-out test was then performed to evaluate the strength of each construct at the pin–bone interface. Initial stiffness analyses showed that the converging configuration was the stiffest, while the diverging configuration was the least stiff. The parallel mounting showed an intermediate stiffness. There was a significantly higher resistance to pull-out force in the diverging pin configuration compared to the converging pin configuration. There was no significant difference in the pull-out strength of the parallel pins compared to the angled pin pairs. Convergent mounting of pin pairs increases the stiffness of a monolateral fixator, whereas a divergent mounting weakens it. Regarding the strength of the pin–bone interface, the divergent pin configuration appears to provide greater resistance to pull-out force than the convergent one. The results of this pilot study should be important for the doctrine of fixator mounting as well as for fixator component design. MDPI 2023-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10451265/ /pubmed/37627867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080982 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Klemeit, Axel
Weber, Anna
Bourauel, Christoph
Welle, Kristian
Burger, Christof
Schildberg, Frank A.
Deborre, Christoph
The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct
title The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct
title_full The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct
title_fullStr The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct
title_short The Influence of Sagittal Pin Angulation on the Stiffness and Pull-Out Strength of a Monolateral Fixator Construct
title_sort influence of sagittal pin angulation on the stiffness and pull-out strength of a monolateral fixator construct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10451265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080982
work_keys_str_mv AT klemeitaxel theinfluenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT weberanna theinfluenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT bourauelchristoph theinfluenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT wellekristian theinfluenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT burgerchristof theinfluenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT schildbergfranka theinfluenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT deborrechristoph theinfluenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT klemeitaxel influenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT weberanna influenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT bourauelchristoph influenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT wellekristian influenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT burgerchristof influenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT schildbergfranka influenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct
AT deborrechristoph influenceofsagittalpinangulationonthestiffnessandpulloutstrengthofamonolateralfixatorconstruct