Can Gender Nouns Influence the Stereotypes of Animals?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Educating about animals in zoos and aquariums is a challenging task for the education teams. They need not only to be well versed in biology but also have excellent communication skills to convey information effectively to people of different ages and cultures. This study aimed at exploring the possible influence of grammatical genders on animal stereotypes and emotions. For this, four animals (panda bear, giraffe, polar bear, and cheetah) were initially chosen. We then investigated whether the use of grammatical genders in the Portuguese language affected the perceived gender, stereotypes, and evoked emotions of these four animals. To make a comparison, English-speaking participants were also surveyed since English lacks grammatical genders. The results showed that the presence of grammatical genders did influence the perceived gender, as well as the stereotype and elicited emotions of some animals, although the effect was relatively minor. This investigation highlights the importance of small but significant details in communication, such as grammatical genders, in the construction of stereotypes and inherent emotions associated with animals. ABSTRACT: Educating about animals in zoos and aquariums poses daily challenges for education teams, who must not only master biological content but also possess communication skills to adapt information for diverse ages and cultures. This research consists of two sequential studies designed to investigate the impact of grammatical genders on animal stereotypes and elicited emotions. In Study 1, four animals were independently chosen based on a set of predefined conditions, which were then used in Study 2. The second study explored whether the presence of grammatical genders in the Portuguese language influenced the perceived stereotypes of four animals (panda bear, giraffe, polar bear, and cheetah) using the Stereotype Content Model framework. For comparison, English-speaking participants were also surveyed, as English lacks grammatical genders. The results demonstrated that grammatical genders influenced the perceived gender, as well as, although only slightly, the warmth, competence, and elicited emotions of some animals. All animals under study were associated with the protective stereotype, regardless of the presence of grammatical gender. This study emphasizes the significance of subtle yet crucial elements in communication, such as grammatical genders, in shaping stereotypes and innate emotional associations concerning animals.