Cargando…
Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
Cryogels, known for their biocompatibility and porous structure, lack mechanical strength, while 3D-printed scaffolds have excellent mechanical properties but limited porosity resolution. By combining a 3D-printed plastic gyroid lattice scaffold with a chitosan–gelatin cryogel scaffold, a scaffold c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10451777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080889 |
_version_ | 1785095500958007296 |
---|---|
author | Olevsky, Levi M. Anup, Amritha Jacques, Mason Keokominh, Nadia Holmgren, Eric P. Hixon, Katherine R. |
author_facet | Olevsky, Levi M. Anup, Amritha Jacques, Mason Keokominh, Nadia Holmgren, Eric P. Hixon, Katherine R. |
author_sort | Olevsky, Levi M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cryogels, known for their biocompatibility and porous structure, lack mechanical strength, while 3D-printed scaffolds have excellent mechanical properties but limited porosity resolution. By combining a 3D-printed plastic gyroid lattice scaffold with a chitosan–gelatin cryogel scaffold, a scaffold can be created that balances the advantages of both fabrication methods. This study compared the pore diameter, swelling potential, mechanical characteristics, and cellular infiltration capability of combined scaffolds and control cryogels. The incorporation of the 3D-printed lattice demonstrated patient-specific geometry capabilities and significantly improved mechanical strength compared to the control cryogel. The combined scaffolds exhibited similar porosity and relative swelling ratio to the control cryogels. However, they had reduced elasticity, reduced absolute swelling capacity, and are potentially cytotoxic, which may affect their performance. This paper presents a novel approach to combine two scaffold types to retain the advantages of each scaffold type while mitigating their shortcomings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10451777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104517772023-08-26 Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Olevsky, Levi M. Anup, Amritha Jacques, Mason Keokominh, Nadia Holmgren, Eric P. Hixon, Katherine R. Bioengineering (Basel) Article Cryogels, known for their biocompatibility and porous structure, lack mechanical strength, while 3D-printed scaffolds have excellent mechanical properties but limited porosity resolution. By combining a 3D-printed plastic gyroid lattice scaffold with a chitosan–gelatin cryogel scaffold, a scaffold can be created that balances the advantages of both fabrication methods. This study compared the pore diameter, swelling potential, mechanical characteristics, and cellular infiltration capability of combined scaffolds and control cryogels. The incorporation of the 3D-printed lattice demonstrated patient-specific geometry capabilities and significantly improved mechanical strength compared to the control cryogel. The combined scaffolds exhibited similar porosity and relative swelling ratio to the control cryogels. However, they had reduced elasticity, reduced absolute swelling capacity, and are potentially cytotoxic, which may affect their performance. This paper presents a novel approach to combine two scaffold types to retain the advantages of each scaffold type while mitigating their shortcomings. MDPI 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10451777/ /pubmed/37627774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080889 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Olevsky, Levi M. Anup, Amritha Jacques, Mason Keokominh, Nadia Holmgren, Eric P. Hixon, Katherine R. Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title | Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_full | Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_short | Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | direct integration of 3d printing and cryogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10451777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37627774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olevskylevim directintegrationof3dprintingandcryogelscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT anupamritha directintegrationof3dprintingandcryogelscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT jacquesmason directintegrationof3dprintingandcryogelscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT keokominhnadia directintegrationof3dprintingandcryogelscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT holmgrenericp directintegrationof3dprintingandcryogelscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering AT hixonkatheriner directintegrationof3dprintingandcryogelscaffoldsforbonetissueengineering |