Cargando…
The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance
Previous research has shown that some forms of non-invasive brain stimulation can increase fatigue resistance. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the time to task failure (TTF) of a precision grip task. The study utilized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13081225 |
_version_ | 1785095609583140864 |
---|---|
author | De Guzman, Kayla A. Young, Richard J. Contini, Valentino Clinton, Eliza Hitchcock, Ashley Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach |
author_facet | De Guzman, Kayla A. Young, Richard J. Contini, Valentino Clinton, Eliza Hitchcock, Ashley Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach |
author_sort | De Guzman, Kayla A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has shown that some forms of non-invasive brain stimulation can increase fatigue resistance. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the time to task failure (TTF) of a precision grip task. The study utilized a randomized, double-blind, SHAM-controlled, within-subjects design. Twenty-six young adults completed two experimental sessions (tACS and SHAM) with a 7-day washout period between sessions. Each session involved a fatiguing isometric contraction of the right hand with a precision grip with either a tACS or SHAM stimulation applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) simultaneously. For the fatiguing contraction, the participants matched an isometric target force of 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force until task failure. Pre- and post-MVCs were performed to quantify the force decline due to fatigue. Accordingly, the dependent variables were the TTF and MVC force decline as well as the average EMG activity, force error, and standard deviation (SD) of force during the fatiguing contractions. The results indicate that there were no significant differences in any of the dependent variables between the tACS and SHAM conditions (p value range: 0.256–0.820). These findings suggest that tACS does not increase the TTF during fatiguing contractions in young adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10452200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104522002023-08-26 The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance De Guzman, Kayla A. Young, Richard J. Contini, Valentino Clinton, Eliza Hitchcock, Ashley Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach Brain Sci Article Previous research has shown that some forms of non-invasive brain stimulation can increase fatigue resistance. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the time to task failure (TTF) of a precision grip task. The study utilized a randomized, double-blind, SHAM-controlled, within-subjects design. Twenty-six young adults completed two experimental sessions (tACS and SHAM) with a 7-day washout period between sessions. Each session involved a fatiguing isometric contraction of the right hand with a precision grip with either a tACS or SHAM stimulation applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) simultaneously. For the fatiguing contraction, the participants matched an isometric target force of 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force until task failure. Pre- and post-MVCs were performed to quantify the force decline due to fatigue. Accordingly, the dependent variables were the TTF and MVC force decline as well as the average EMG activity, force error, and standard deviation (SD) of force during the fatiguing contractions. The results indicate that there were no significant differences in any of the dependent variables between the tACS and SHAM conditions (p value range: 0.256–0.820). These findings suggest that tACS does not increase the TTF during fatiguing contractions in young adults. MDPI 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10452200/ /pubmed/37626581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13081225 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Guzman, Kayla A. Young, Richard J. Contini, Valentino Clinton, Eliza Hitchcock, Ashley Riley, Zachary A. Poston, Brach The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance |
title | The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance |
title_full | The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance |
title_short | The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Fatigue Resistance |
title_sort | influence of transcranial alternating current stimulation on fatigue resistance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13081225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deguzmankaylaa theinfluenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT youngrichardj theinfluenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT continivalentino theinfluenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT clintoneliza theinfluenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT hitchcockashley theinfluenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT rileyzacharya theinfluenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT postonbrach theinfluenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT deguzmankaylaa influenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT youngrichardj influenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT continivalentino influenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT clintoneliza influenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT hitchcockashley influenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT rileyzacharya influenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance AT postonbrach influenceoftranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationonfatigueresistance |