Cargando…

Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis remains one of the major health problems worldwide. Besides the lungs, tuberculosis affects other organs, including bones and joints. In the case of bone tuberculosis, current treatment protocols include necrectomy in combination with conventional anti-tuberculosis therapy, followed by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinogradova, Tatiana I., Serdobintsev, Mikhail S., Korzhikova-Vlakh, Evgenia G., Korzhikov-Vlakh, Viktor A., Kaftyrev, Alexander S., Blum, Natalya M., Semenova, Natalya Yu., Esmedlyaeva, Dilyara S., Dyakova, Marina E., Nashchekina, Yulia A., Dogonadze, Marine Z., Zabolotnykh, Natalia V., Yablonsky, Petr K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082229
_version_ 1785095670584049664
author Vinogradova, Tatiana I.
Serdobintsev, Mikhail S.
Korzhikova-Vlakh, Evgenia G.
Korzhikov-Vlakh, Viktor A.
Kaftyrev, Alexander S.
Blum, Natalya M.
Semenova, Natalya Yu.
Esmedlyaeva, Dilyara S.
Dyakova, Marina E.
Nashchekina, Yulia A.
Dogonadze, Marine Z.
Zabolotnykh, Natalia V.
Yablonsky, Petr K.
author_facet Vinogradova, Tatiana I.
Serdobintsev, Mikhail S.
Korzhikova-Vlakh, Evgenia G.
Korzhikov-Vlakh, Viktor A.
Kaftyrev, Alexander S.
Blum, Natalya M.
Semenova, Natalya Yu.
Esmedlyaeva, Dilyara S.
Dyakova, Marina E.
Nashchekina, Yulia A.
Dogonadze, Marine Z.
Zabolotnykh, Natalia V.
Yablonsky, Petr K.
author_sort Vinogradova, Tatiana I.
collection PubMed
description Tuberculosis remains one of the major health problems worldwide. Besides the lungs, tuberculosis affects other organs, including bones and joints. In the case of bone tuberculosis, current treatment protocols include necrectomy in combination with conventional anti-tuberculosis therapy, followed by reconstruction of the resulting bone defects. In this study, we compared autografting and implantation with a biodegradable composite scaffold for bone-defect regeneration in a tuberculosis rabbit model. Porous three-dimensional composite materials were prepared by 3D printing and consisted of poly(ε-caprolactone) filled with nanocrystalline cellulose modified with poly(glutamic acid). In addition, rabbit mesenchymal stem cells were adhered to the surface of the composite scaffolds. The developed tuberculosis model was verified by immunological subcutaneous test, real-time polymerase chain reaction, biochemical markers and histomorphological study. Infected animals were randomly divided into three groups, representing the infection control and two experimental groups subjected to necrectomy, anti-tuberculosis treatment, and plastic surgery using autografts or 3D-composite scaffolds. The lifetime observation of the experimental animals and analysis of various biochemical markers at different time periods allowed the comparison of the state of the animals between the groups. Micro-computed tomography and histomorphological analysis enabled the evaluation of osteogenesis, inflammation and cellular changes between the groups, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10452435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104524352023-08-26 Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis Vinogradova, Tatiana I. Serdobintsev, Mikhail S. Korzhikova-Vlakh, Evgenia G. Korzhikov-Vlakh, Viktor A. Kaftyrev, Alexander S. Blum, Natalya M. Semenova, Natalya Yu. Esmedlyaeva, Dilyara S. Dyakova, Marina E. Nashchekina, Yulia A. Dogonadze, Marine Z. Zabolotnykh, Natalia V. Yablonsky, Petr K. Biomedicines Article Tuberculosis remains one of the major health problems worldwide. Besides the lungs, tuberculosis affects other organs, including bones and joints. In the case of bone tuberculosis, current treatment protocols include necrectomy in combination with conventional anti-tuberculosis therapy, followed by reconstruction of the resulting bone defects. In this study, we compared autografting and implantation with a biodegradable composite scaffold for bone-defect regeneration in a tuberculosis rabbit model. Porous three-dimensional composite materials were prepared by 3D printing and consisted of poly(ε-caprolactone) filled with nanocrystalline cellulose modified with poly(glutamic acid). In addition, rabbit mesenchymal stem cells were adhered to the surface of the composite scaffolds. The developed tuberculosis model was verified by immunological subcutaneous test, real-time polymerase chain reaction, biochemical markers and histomorphological study. Infected animals were randomly divided into three groups, representing the infection control and two experimental groups subjected to necrectomy, anti-tuberculosis treatment, and plastic surgery using autografts or 3D-composite scaffolds. The lifetime observation of the experimental animals and analysis of various biochemical markers at different time periods allowed the comparison of the state of the animals between the groups. Micro-computed tomography and histomorphological analysis enabled the evaluation of osteogenesis, inflammation and cellular changes between the groups, respectively. MDPI 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10452435/ /pubmed/37626725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082229 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vinogradova, Tatiana I.
Serdobintsev, Mikhail S.
Korzhikova-Vlakh, Evgenia G.
Korzhikov-Vlakh, Viktor A.
Kaftyrev, Alexander S.
Blum, Natalya M.
Semenova, Natalya Yu.
Esmedlyaeva, Dilyara S.
Dyakova, Marina E.
Nashchekina, Yulia A.
Dogonadze, Marine Z.
Zabolotnykh, Natalia V.
Yablonsky, Petr K.
Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis
title Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis
title_full Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis
title_fullStr Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis
title_short Comparison of Autografts and Biodegradable 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds with Osteoconductive Properties for Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tuberculosis
title_sort comparison of autografts and biodegradable 3d-printed composite scaffolds with osteoconductive properties for tissue regeneration in bone tuberculosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082229
work_keys_str_mv AT vinogradovatatianai comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT serdobintsevmikhails comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT korzhikovavlakhevgeniag comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT korzhikovvlakhviktora comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT kaftyrevalexanders comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT blumnatalyam comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT semenovanatalyayu comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT esmedlyaevadilyaras comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT dyakovamarinae comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT nashchekinayuliaa comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT dogonadzemarinez comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT zabolotnykhnataliav comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis
AT yablonskypetrk comparisonofautograftsandbiodegradable3dprintedcompositescaffoldswithosteoconductivepropertiesfortissueregenerationinbonetuberculosis