Cargando…
Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
According to the 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) should receive chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. This study examined the real-world survival benefits of modifying BRPC treatment guidelines. Patients t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082302 |
_version_ | 1785095775057870848 |
---|---|
author | Jeon, Hyun Jeong Lim, Soo Yeun Jeong, HyeJeong Yoon, So Jeong Kim, Hongbeom Shin, Sang Hyun Heo, Jin Seok Han, In Woong |
author_facet | Jeon, Hyun Jeong Lim, Soo Yeun Jeong, HyeJeong Yoon, So Jeong Kim, Hongbeom Shin, Sang Hyun Heo, Jin Seok Han, In Woong |
author_sort | Jeon, Hyun Jeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) should receive chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. This study examined the real-world survival benefits of modifying BRPC treatment guidelines. Patients treated for BRPC at a single institution from 2013 to 2015 (pre-guideline group) and 2017 to 2019 (post-guideline group) were retrospectively reviewed. According to the treatment method used, patients were classified into upfront surgery (US), surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), and chemotherapy only (CO) groups. Overall survival (OS) was compared according to period and treatment type. Factors associated with OS were analyzed using a Cox regression model. Among the 165 patients, 63 were in the pre-guideline group and 102 patients were in the post-guideline group. The median OS was significantly improved in the post-guideline group compared to the pre-guideline group (29 vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). According to the treatment method, the median OS of the NAT group was significantly longer than that of the US and CO groups (40 vs. 16 vs. 15 months, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, differentiation, NAT, and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors. NAT is an important treatment option for BRPC and increased patient survival in the real world. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10452854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104528542023-08-26 Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Jeon, Hyun Jeong Lim, Soo Yeun Jeong, HyeJeong Yoon, So Jeong Kim, Hongbeom Shin, Sang Hyun Heo, Jin Seok Han, In Woong Biomedicines Article According to the 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) should receive chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. This study examined the real-world survival benefits of modifying BRPC treatment guidelines. Patients treated for BRPC at a single institution from 2013 to 2015 (pre-guideline group) and 2017 to 2019 (post-guideline group) were retrospectively reviewed. According to the treatment method used, patients were classified into upfront surgery (US), surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), and chemotherapy only (CO) groups. Overall survival (OS) was compared according to period and treatment type. Factors associated with OS were analyzed using a Cox regression model. Among the 165 patients, 63 were in the pre-guideline group and 102 patients were in the post-guideline group. The median OS was significantly improved in the post-guideline group compared to the pre-guideline group (29 vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). According to the treatment method, the median OS of the NAT group was significantly longer than that of the US and CO groups (40 vs. 16 vs. 15 months, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, differentiation, NAT, and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors. NAT is an important treatment option for BRPC and increased patient survival in the real world. MDPI 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10452854/ /pubmed/37626798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082302 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jeon, Hyun Jeong Lim, Soo Yeun Jeong, HyeJeong Yoon, So Jeong Kim, Hongbeom Shin, Sang Hyun Heo, Jin Seok Han, In Woong Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer |
title | Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer |
title_full | Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer |
title_fullStr | Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer |
title_short | Survival Benefit after Shifting from Upfront Surgery to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer |
title_sort | survival benefit after shifting from upfront surgery to neoadjuvant treatment in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeonhyunjeong survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT limsooyeun survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT jeonghyejeong survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT yoonsojeong survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT kimhongbeom survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT shinsanghyun survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT heojinseok survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer AT haninwoong survivalbenefitaftershiftingfromupfrontsurgerytoneoadjuvanttreatmentinborderlineresectablepancreaticcancer |