Cargando…

Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed genitourinary malignancies. For many years, the primary treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) was predicated on the use of platinum-based chemotherapy. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were approved by regulatory agenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hui, Gavin, Stefanoudakis, Dimitrios, Zektser, Yuliya, Isaacs, Dayna Jill, Hannigan, Christopher, Pantuck, Allan J., Drakaki, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080536
_version_ 1785095801921339392
author Hui, Gavin
Stefanoudakis, Dimitrios
Zektser, Yuliya
Isaacs, Dayna Jill
Hannigan, Christopher
Pantuck, Allan J.
Drakaki, Alexandra
author_facet Hui, Gavin
Stefanoudakis, Dimitrios
Zektser, Yuliya
Isaacs, Dayna Jill
Hannigan, Christopher
Pantuck, Allan J.
Drakaki, Alexandra
author_sort Hui, Gavin
collection PubMed
description Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed genitourinary malignancies. For many years, the primary treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) was predicated on the use of platinum-based chemotherapy. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were approved by regulatory agencies such as the US FDA for use in both the first- and second-line settings. This review outlines the approved ICIs for mUC in the second-line setting and as an alternative to chemotherapy in the first-line setting, as well as the novel agents that have also been incorporated into the treatment of this malignancy. Single-agent ICIs are often used in second-line settings in mUC, and there are three drugs currently approved for those who progress after receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. In the first-line setting, the preferred treatment regimen remains cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, single-agent ICI can be an alternative first-line treatment for those who are not candidates for cisplatin-based therapy. There are also clinical trials adding ICIs to chemotherapy as combination regimens. However, treatment for mUC has now expanded even beyond immunotherapy. Newer targeted agents such as erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, and two antibody–drug conjugates, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, have been recently approved. As new drug agents are discovered, it will be important to assess both the treatment outcomes as well as the effects on patients’ quality of life. Furthermore, integrating genetic and molecular information can help guide treatment decisions as next-generation sequencing is more commonly acquired during the evaluation of newly diagnosed patients with advanced and metastatic cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10452970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104529702023-08-26 Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Hui, Gavin Stefanoudakis, Dimitrios Zektser, Yuliya Isaacs, Dayna Jill Hannigan, Christopher Pantuck, Allan J. Drakaki, Alexandra Curr Oncol Review Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed genitourinary malignancies. For many years, the primary treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) was predicated on the use of platinum-based chemotherapy. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were approved by regulatory agencies such as the US FDA for use in both the first- and second-line settings. This review outlines the approved ICIs for mUC in the second-line setting and as an alternative to chemotherapy in the first-line setting, as well as the novel agents that have also been incorporated into the treatment of this malignancy. Single-agent ICIs are often used in second-line settings in mUC, and there are three drugs currently approved for those who progress after receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. In the first-line setting, the preferred treatment regimen remains cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, single-agent ICI can be an alternative first-line treatment for those who are not candidates for cisplatin-based therapy. There are also clinical trials adding ICIs to chemotherapy as combination regimens. However, treatment for mUC has now expanded even beyond immunotherapy. Newer targeted agents such as erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, and two antibody–drug conjugates, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, have been recently approved. As new drug agents are discovered, it will be important to assess both the treatment outcomes as well as the effects on patients’ quality of life. Furthermore, integrating genetic and molecular information can help guide treatment decisions as next-generation sequencing is more commonly acquired during the evaluation of newly diagnosed patients with advanced and metastatic cancer. MDPI 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10452970/ /pubmed/37623017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080536 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hui, Gavin
Stefanoudakis, Dimitrios
Zektser, Yuliya
Isaacs, Dayna Jill
Hannigan, Christopher
Pantuck, Allan J.
Drakaki, Alexandra
Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
title Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
title_full Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
title_fullStr Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
title_short Do Cancer Genetics Impact Treatment Decision Making? Immunotherapy and Beyond in the Management of Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
title_sort do cancer genetics impact treatment decision making? immunotherapy and beyond in the management of advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37623017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080536
work_keys_str_mv AT huigavin docancergeneticsimpacttreatmentdecisionmakingimmunotherapyandbeyondinthemanagementofadvancedandmetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT stefanoudakisdimitrios docancergeneticsimpacttreatmentdecisionmakingimmunotherapyandbeyondinthemanagementofadvancedandmetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT zektseryuliya docancergeneticsimpacttreatmentdecisionmakingimmunotherapyandbeyondinthemanagementofadvancedandmetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT isaacsdaynajill docancergeneticsimpacttreatmentdecisionmakingimmunotherapyandbeyondinthemanagementofadvancedandmetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT hanniganchristopher docancergeneticsimpacttreatmentdecisionmakingimmunotherapyandbeyondinthemanagementofadvancedandmetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT pantuckallanj docancergeneticsimpacttreatmentdecisionmakingimmunotherapyandbeyondinthemanagementofadvancedandmetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT drakakialexandra docancergeneticsimpacttreatmentdecisionmakingimmunotherapyandbeyondinthemanagementofadvancedandmetastaticurothelialcarcinoma