Cargando…
Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury
Limbal stem cell (LSC) deficiency is a frequent and severe complication after chemical injury to the eye. Previous studies have assumed this is mediated directly by the caustic agent. Here we show that LSC damage occurs through immune cell mediators, even without direct injury to LSCs. In particular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12162089 |
_version_ | 1785095833249644544 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Chengxin Lei, Fengyang Mittermaier, Mirja Ksander, Bruce Dana, Reza Dohlman, Claes H. Vavvas, Demetrios G. Chodosh, James Paschalis, Eleftherios I. |
author_facet | Zhou, Chengxin Lei, Fengyang Mittermaier, Mirja Ksander, Bruce Dana, Reza Dohlman, Claes H. Vavvas, Demetrios G. Chodosh, James Paschalis, Eleftherios I. |
author_sort | Zhou, Chengxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Limbal stem cell (LSC) deficiency is a frequent and severe complication after chemical injury to the eye. Previous studies have assumed this is mediated directly by the caustic agent. Here we show that LSC damage occurs through immune cell mediators, even without direct injury to LSCs. In particular, pH elevation in the anterior chamber (AC) causes acute uveal stress, the release of inflammatory cytokines at the basal limbal tissue, and subsequent LSC damage and death. Peripheral C-C chemokine receptor type 2 positive/CX3C motif chemokine receptor 1 negative (CCR2(+) CX3CR1(−)) monocytes are the key mediators of LSC damage through the upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) at the limbus. In contrast to peripherally derived monocytes, CX3CR1(+) CCR2(−) tissue-resident macrophages have a protective role, and their depletion prior to injury exacerbates LSC loss and increases LSC vulnerability to TNF-α-mediated apoptosis independently of CCR2(+) cell infiltration into the tissue. Consistently, repopulation of the tissue by new resident macrophages not only restores the protective M2-like phenotype of macrophages but also suppresses LSC loss after exposure to inflammatory signals. These findings may have clinical implications in patients with LSC loss after chemical burns or due to other inflammatory conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10453077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104530772023-08-26 Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury Zhou, Chengxin Lei, Fengyang Mittermaier, Mirja Ksander, Bruce Dana, Reza Dohlman, Claes H. Vavvas, Demetrios G. Chodosh, James Paschalis, Eleftherios I. Cells Article Limbal stem cell (LSC) deficiency is a frequent and severe complication after chemical injury to the eye. Previous studies have assumed this is mediated directly by the caustic agent. Here we show that LSC damage occurs through immune cell mediators, even without direct injury to LSCs. In particular, pH elevation in the anterior chamber (AC) causes acute uveal stress, the release of inflammatory cytokines at the basal limbal tissue, and subsequent LSC damage and death. Peripheral C-C chemokine receptor type 2 positive/CX3C motif chemokine receptor 1 negative (CCR2(+) CX3CR1(−)) monocytes are the key mediators of LSC damage through the upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) at the limbus. In contrast to peripherally derived monocytes, CX3CR1(+) CCR2(−) tissue-resident macrophages have a protective role, and their depletion prior to injury exacerbates LSC loss and increases LSC vulnerability to TNF-α-mediated apoptosis independently of CCR2(+) cell infiltration into the tissue. Consistently, repopulation of the tissue by new resident macrophages not only restores the protective M2-like phenotype of macrophages but also suppresses LSC loss after exposure to inflammatory signals. These findings may have clinical implications in patients with LSC loss after chemical burns or due to other inflammatory conditions. MDPI 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10453077/ /pubmed/37626899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12162089 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhou, Chengxin Lei, Fengyang Mittermaier, Mirja Ksander, Bruce Dana, Reza Dohlman, Claes H. Vavvas, Demetrios G. Chodosh, James Paschalis, Eleftherios I. Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury |
title | Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury |
title_full | Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury |
title_fullStr | Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury |
title_short | Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury |
title_sort | opposing roles of blood-borne monocytes and tissue-resident macrophages in limbal stem cell damage after ocular injury |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12162089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouchengxin opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT leifengyang opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT mittermaiermirja opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT ksanderbruce opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT danareza opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT dohlmanclaesh opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT vavvasdemetriosg opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT chodoshjames opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury AT paschaliseleftheriosi opposingrolesofbloodbornemonocytesandtissueresidentmacrophagesinlimbalstemcelldamageafterocularinjury |