Cargando…

Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: To determine if low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the primary motor cortex contralateral (M1(CL)) to the affected corticospinal tract in patients with hemiparetic stroke augments intensive training–related clinical improvement; an extension of the NICHE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Dylan J., Liu, Charles Y., Dunning, Kari, Fregni, Felipe, Laine, Jarmo, Leiby, Benjamin E., Rogers, Lynn M., Harvey, Richard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37577801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043164
_version_ 1785095915118264320
author Edwards, Dylan J.
Liu, Charles Y.
Dunning, Kari
Fregni, Felipe
Laine, Jarmo
Leiby, Benjamin E.
Rogers, Lynn M.
Harvey, Richard L.
author_facet Edwards, Dylan J.
Liu, Charles Y.
Dunning, Kari
Fregni, Felipe
Laine, Jarmo
Leiby, Benjamin E.
Rogers, Lynn M.
Harvey, Richard L.
author_sort Edwards, Dylan J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine if low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the primary motor cortex contralateral (M1(CL)) to the affected corticospinal tract in patients with hemiparetic stroke augments intensive training–related clinical improvement; an extension of the NICHE trial (Navigated Inhibitory rTMS to Contralesional Hemisphere Trial) using an alternative sham coil. METHODS: The present E-FIT trial (Electric Field Navigated 1Hz rTMS for Post-stroke Motor Recovery Trial) included 5 of 12 NICHE trial outpatient US rehabilitation centers. The stimulation protocol remained identical (1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, M1(CL), preceding 60-minute therapy, 18 sessions/6 wks; parallel arm randomized clinical trial). The sham coil appearance mimicked the active coil but without the weak electric field in the NICHE trial sham coil. Outcomes measured 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months after the end of treatment included the following: upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (primary, 6 months after end of treatment), Action Research Arm Test, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, quality of life (EQ-5D), and safety. RESULTS: Of 60 participants randomized, 58 completed treatment and were included for analysis. Bayesian analysis of combined data from the E-FIT and the NICHE trials indicated that active treatment was not superior to sham at the primary end point (posterior mean odds ratio of 1.94 [96% credible interval of 0.61–4.80]). For the E-FIT intent-to-treat population, upper extremity Fugl-Meyer improvement ≥5 pts occurred in 60% (18/30) active group and 50% (14/28) sham group. Participants enrolled 3 to 6 months following stroke had a 67% (31%–91% CI) response rate in the active group at the 6-month end point versus 50% in the sham group (21.5%–78.5% CI). There were significant improvements from baseline to 6 months for both active and sham groups in upper extremity Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test, and EQ-5D (P<0.05). Improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was observed only in the active group (P=0.004). Ten serious unrelated adverse events occurred (4 active group, 6 sham group, P=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive motor rehabilitation 3 to 12 months after stroke improved clinical impairment, function, and quality of life; however, 1 Hz-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was not an effective treatment adjuvant in the present sample population with mixed lesion location and extent. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03010462.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10453351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104533512023-08-26 Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial Edwards, Dylan J. Liu, Charles Y. Dunning, Kari Fregni, Felipe Laine, Jarmo Leiby, Benjamin E. Rogers, Lynn M. Harvey, Richard L. Stroke Clinical Trials BACKGROUND: To determine if low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting the primary motor cortex contralateral (M1(CL)) to the affected corticospinal tract in patients with hemiparetic stroke augments intensive training–related clinical improvement; an extension of the NICHE trial (Navigated Inhibitory rTMS to Contralesional Hemisphere Trial) using an alternative sham coil. METHODS: The present E-FIT trial (Electric Field Navigated 1Hz rTMS for Post-stroke Motor Recovery Trial) included 5 of 12 NICHE trial outpatient US rehabilitation centers. The stimulation protocol remained identical (1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, M1(CL), preceding 60-minute therapy, 18 sessions/6 wks; parallel arm randomized clinical trial). The sham coil appearance mimicked the active coil but without the weak electric field in the NICHE trial sham coil. Outcomes measured 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months after the end of treatment included the following: upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (primary, 6 months after end of treatment), Action Research Arm Test, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, quality of life (EQ-5D), and safety. RESULTS: Of 60 participants randomized, 58 completed treatment and were included for analysis. Bayesian analysis of combined data from the E-FIT and the NICHE trials indicated that active treatment was not superior to sham at the primary end point (posterior mean odds ratio of 1.94 [96% credible interval of 0.61–4.80]). For the E-FIT intent-to-treat population, upper extremity Fugl-Meyer improvement ≥5 pts occurred in 60% (18/30) active group and 50% (14/28) sham group. Participants enrolled 3 to 6 months following stroke had a 67% (31%–91% CI) response rate in the active group at the 6-month end point versus 50% in the sham group (21.5%–78.5% CI). There were significant improvements from baseline to 6 months for both active and sham groups in upper extremity Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test, and EQ-5D (P<0.05). Improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was observed only in the active group (P=0.004). Ten serious unrelated adverse events occurred (4 active group, 6 sham group, P=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive motor rehabilitation 3 to 12 months after stroke improved clinical impairment, function, and quality of life; however, 1 Hz-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was not an effective treatment adjuvant in the present sample population with mixed lesion location and extent. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03010462. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-14 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10453351/ /pubmed/37577801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043164 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials
Edwards, Dylan J.
Liu, Charles Y.
Dunning, Kari
Fregni, Felipe
Laine, Jarmo
Leiby, Benjamin E.
Rogers, Lynn M.
Harvey, Richard L.
Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial
title Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Electric Field Navigated 1-Hz rTMS for Poststroke Motor Recovery: The E-FIT Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort electric field navigated 1-hz rtms for poststroke motor recovery: the e-fit randomized controlled trial
topic Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37577801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043164
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsdylanj electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liucharlesy electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dunningkari electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fregnifelipe electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lainejarmo electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leibybenjamine electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rogerslynnm electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harveyrichardl electricfieldnavigated1hzrtmsforpoststrokemotorrecoverytheefitrandomizedcontrolledtrial