Cargando…
An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer
This study evaluated the quality and usefulness of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for adults with cancer. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to add rigor to the search, as well as to the data collection and analysis. The apps available in the most used app stores (Google Pl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080518 |
_version_ | 1785095927172694016 |
---|---|
author | Wasserman, Sydney Ould Brahim, Lydia Attiya, Ameer Belzile, Eric Lambert, Sylvie D. |
author_facet | Wasserman, Sydney Ould Brahim, Lydia Attiya, Ameer Belzile, Eric Lambert, Sylvie D. |
author_sort | Wasserman, Sydney |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluated the quality and usefulness of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for adults with cancer. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to add rigor to the search, as well as to the data collection and analysis. The apps available in the most used app stores (Google Play and Apple) with interactive tailored features were identified. To supplement this, a Google web search was also conducted. The apps were evaluated for their quality using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and for their usefulness using a checklist of end users‘ desired features derived from the literature. The searches returned 3046 apps and 17 were retained for evaluation. The average quality score of the apps across the sample was 3.62/5 (SD 0.26, range: 3.14–4.06), with Outcomes4me scoring the highest. On average, the apps scored 50% (SD 2.5, range: 31–88%) on the usefulness checklist, with Cancer.net scoring the highest. The lowest-scoring categories were communications features on the usefulness checklist and “information” on the MARS, indicating areas for future work. The findings identified the apps of an acceptable quality and usefulness that could be recommended to those with cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10453401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104534012023-08-26 An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer Wasserman, Sydney Ould Brahim, Lydia Attiya, Ameer Belzile, Eric Lambert, Sylvie D. Curr Oncol Article This study evaluated the quality and usefulness of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for adults with cancer. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to add rigor to the search, as well as to the data collection and analysis. The apps available in the most used app stores (Google Play and Apple) with interactive tailored features were identified. To supplement this, a Google web search was also conducted. The apps were evaluated for their quality using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and for their usefulness using a checklist of end users‘ desired features derived from the literature. The searches returned 3046 apps and 17 were retained for evaluation. The average quality score of the apps across the sample was 3.62/5 (SD 0.26, range: 3.14–4.06), with Outcomes4me scoring the highest. On average, the apps scored 50% (SD 2.5, range: 31–88%) on the usefulness checklist, with Cancer.net scoring the highest. The lowest-scoring categories were communications features on the usefulness checklist and “information” on the MARS, indicating areas for future work. The findings identified the apps of an acceptable quality and usefulness that could be recommended to those with cancer. MDPI 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10453401/ /pubmed/37622999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080518 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wasserman, Sydney Ould Brahim, Lydia Attiya, Ameer Belzile, Eric Lambert, Sylvie D. An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer |
title | An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer |
title_full | An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer |
title_short | An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer |
title_sort | evaluation of interactive mhealth applications for adults living with cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wassermansydney anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT ouldbrahimlydia anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT attiyaameer anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT belzileeric anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT lambertsylvied anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT wassermansydney evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT ouldbrahimlydia evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT attiyaameer evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT belzileeric evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer AT lambertsylvied evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer |