Cargando…

An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer

This study evaluated the quality and usefulness of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for adults with cancer. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to add rigor to the search, as well as to the data collection and analysis. The apps available in the most used app stores (Google Pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasserman, Sydney, Ould Brahim, Lydia, Attiya, Ameer, Belzile, Eric, Lambert, Sylvie D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080518
_version_ 1785095927172694016
author Wasserman, Sydney
Ould Brahim, Lydia
Attiya, Ameer
Belzile, Eric
Lambert, Sylvie D.
author_facet Wasserman, Sydney
Ould Brahim, Lydia
Attiya, Ameer
Belzile, Eric
Lambert, Sylvie D.
author_sort Wasserman, Sydney
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the quality and usefulness of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for adults with cancer. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to add rigor to the search, as well as to the data collection and analysis. The apps available in the most used app stores (Google Play and Apple) with interactive tailored features were identified. To supplement this, a Google web search was also conducted. The apps were evaluated for their quality using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and for their usefulness using a checklist of end users‘ desired features derived from the literature. The searches returned 3046 apps and 17 were retained for evaluation. The average quality score of the apps across the sample was 3.62/5 (SD 0.26, range: 3.14–4.06), with Outcomes4me scoring the highest. On average, the apps scored 50% (SD 2.5, range: 31–88%) on the usefulness checklist, with Cancer.net scoring the highest. The lowest-scoring categories were communications features on the usefulness checklist and “information” on the MARS, indicating areas for future work. The findings identified the apps of an acceptable quality and usefulness that could be recommended to those with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10453401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104534012023-08-26 An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer Wasserman, Sydney Ould Brahim, Lydia Attiya, Ameer Belzile, Eric Lambert, Sylvie D. Curr Oncol Article This study evaluated the quality and usefulness of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for adults with cancer. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to add rigor to the search, as well as to the data collection and analysis. The apps available in the most used app stores (Google Play and Apple) with interactive tailored features were identified. To supplement this, a Google web search was also conducted. The apps were evaluated for their quality using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and for their usefulness using a checklist of end users‘ desired features derived from the literature. The searches returned 3046 apps and 17 were retained for evaluation. The average quality score of the apps across the sample was 3.62/5 (SD 0.26, range: 3.14–4.06), with Outcomes4me scoring the highest. On average, the apps scored 50% (SD 2.5, range: 31–88%) on the usefulness checklist, with Cancer.net scoring the highest. The lowest-scoring categories were communications features on the usefulness checklist and “information” on the MARS, indicating areas for future work. The findings identified the apps of an acceptable quality and usefulness that could be recommended to those with cancer. MDPI 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10453401/ /pubmed/37622999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080518 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wasserman, Sydney
Ould Brahim, Lydia
Attiya, Ameer
Belzile, Eric
Lambert, Sylvie D.
An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer
title An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer
title_full An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer
title_short An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer
title_sort evaluation of interactive mhealth applications for adults living with cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30080518
work_keys_str_mv AT wassermansydney anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT ouldbrahimlydia anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT attiyaameer anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT belzileeric anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT lambertsylvied anevaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT wassermansydney evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT ouldbrahimlydia evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT attiyaameer evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT belzileeric evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer
AT lambertsylvied evaluationofinteractivemhealthapplicationsforadultslivingwithcancer