Comparison of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Identification Using Different Machine Learning Algorithms and Radiomics

Different machine learning algorithms have different characteristics and applicability. This study aims to predict ruptured intracranial aneurysms by radiomics models based on different machine learning algorithms and evaluate their differences in the same data condition. A total of 576 patients with intracranial aneurysms (192 ruptured and 384 unruptured intracranial aneurysms) from two institutions are included and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts in a ratio of 7:3. Of the 107 radiomics features extracted from computed tomography angiography images, seven features stood out. Then, radiomics features and 12 common machine learning algorithms, including the decision-making tree, support vector machine, logistic regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, bagging classifier, AdaBoost, gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, and CatBoost were applied to construct models for predicting ruptured intracranial aneurysms, and the predictive performance of all models was compared. In the validation cohort, the area under curve (AUC) values of models based on AdaBoost, gradient boosting, and CatBoost for predicting ruptured intracranial aneurysms were 0.889, 0.883, and 0.864, respectively, with no significant differences among them. Of note, the performance of these models was significantly superior to that of the other nine models. The AUC of the AdaBoost model in the cross-validation was within the range of 0.842 to 0.918. Radiomics models based on the machine learning algorithms can be used to predict ruptured intracranial aneurysms, and the prediction efficacy differs among machine learning algorithms. The boosting algorithms might be superior in the application of radiomics combined with the machine learning algorithm to predict aneurysm ruptures.